Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DSL/PW/Gladstones vanishing Windscreen PCN Claimform - disabled bay - NEW MERSEY SHOPPING PARK - PUBLIC- SPEKE ROAD LIVERPOOL L24 8QB


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 625 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, 
Help! 
I’ve just received a Claim Form from the County Court regarding a PCN issued originally in 8th February 2018 by Defence Systems Ltd.

 

To my recollection I have never received any fine letters.

 

It states the PCN was issued because I was parked in a disabled bay at my local retail park.

 

It states the original fine of £100 wasn't paid and now have a County court letter to pay a £315 fine.

 

The letter was issued 9th Aug but have just returned from holiday today so have 7 days left to figure out what I do.

 

 Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is NOT A FINE!!

nowhere does any communication use that word...

its a speculative invoice

 

please complete this

 

and scan up bothsides of any previous letters to one mass PDF

read our upload guide carefully

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to DSL PCN claimform
  • dx100uk changed the title to DSL PCN claimform - disabled bay at retail park

Please fill in the sticky linked in DX's reply post, then the Team can look at how to defend this, and yes its not and never can be a FINE, but unlike a speeding fine a CCJ  will trash your credit rating so please provide the information requested in the sticky.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please be clear about what you've received because it makes a massive amount of difference and the clock is ticking.

 

What exactly is this £315 demand?  Is it a county court judgement?  It would be massively helpful if you could upload the first page.

 

Plus have you moved since February 2018?  Could that explain letters going missing?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which Court have you received the claim from ? county Court Business Centre

Northampton

 

Name of the Claimant :

Defence Systems Limited T/A Park Watch

 

Claimants Solicitors: 

Gladstone Solicitors Limited 

Warrington

 

Date of issue – 

Date 9th Aug 2022

 

Date for AOS - submitted acknowledgement 17/08/2022

 

Date to submit Defence - 

 

What is the claim for 

1. parked in breach of the terms of the parking stipulated on the signage (the contract) at NEW MERSEY SHOPPING PARK - PUBLIC- SPEKE ROAD LIVERPOOL L24 8QB, on 08/02/2018, thus incurring the parking charge (the PCN).

 

2. The PCN was not paid within 28days of issue. The claimant claims the unpaid PCN from the defendant as the driver/keeper of the vehicle.

 

3. Despite demands being made, the defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability.

 

5. The claimant claims £100 for the PCN , £70 contractual costs pursuant of the contract and PCN terms and conditions,  together with statutory interest of £60.13 pursuant to s69 of the county courts act 1984 at 8.00% per annum, continuing at £0.04 per day.

 

What is the value of the claim?

£315.13

 

Amount Claimed £230.13

court fees £35.00

legal rep fees £50.00

Total Amount £315.13

 

.............

 

No I haven't moved, I have never received any letters.

I will get the document uploaded today

 

 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, "good" news.  You haven't lost a court case as I'd feared.  However, you are involved in one.

 

I see you've already done Acknowledgement of Service.  Well done.  That buys you extra time to prepare your defence.

 

Despite what I wrote earlier we don't need an upload of the claim form - they're all the same.  We needed the Particulars of Claim, which you've provided.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So two obvious questions.

 

Are you really, absolutely sure the letters haven't gone to a previous address?  The private parking companies, parasites though they are, do send out several letters before starting a court case.  Gladstones solicitors, crooks though they are, always send a Letter of Claim before starting a claim.

 

I know it's nearly five years ago, but can you remember anything about how you could have got the ticket in your local retail park?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim


type your name ONLY


no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

………….
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember speaking to a lady completing a customer satisfaction questionnaire at the time, 

 

I'd just had a baby and said as the retail park was being made larger they had removed parent child spaces 

 

she informed me to park in the old bays which had yet been painted as disabled.

 

There was never a ticket placed on my car.

 

I possibly could have received a letter but as I said I had just had a baby, we where in the process of moving (didn't actually move in the end).

 

I have not previously received anything from Gladstone Solicitors about a letter of claim

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

That amount looks dodgy,  £60 INTEREST?  Did you out yourself as the Driver?  Are they suing you  as Driver or keeper?

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just type .no need to keep hitting quote.. it makes the thread twice as long .

 

Thread tidied 

 

Something is not right here,

 

when did you last move?

 

Is the car registered on the V5C in your name?

 

And always has been?

 

As there are probably about 10 letters from various scammers gone missing 

 

As this was an operator capture there should have been a windscreen ticket.

 

And any letters sent should not have been sent until 29 days had expired.

 

So there exhibits when it / if it ever gets to the disclosure stage will be very interesting!!

 

I have a feeling this could be discontinued before then 

 

They were hoping you would wet yourself and cough up 

 

They have waited almost till the claim is statute barred to run up the interest 

 

Wondering if in this case an SAR to the claimant might be fun!!!

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be for sure that SAR might be interesting leaving it so long also does them no favours.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to DSL/PW/Gladstones vanishing Windscreen PCN Claimform - disabled bay - NEW MERSEY SHOPPING PARK - PUBLIC- SPEKE ROAD LIVERPOOL L24 8QB

dx100uk there was never a ticket on my windscreen.

 

We were meant to move in September 2018 but it all fell through so still live at the same address.

 

I sold the car in question in August 2019, it was registered in my name. 

 

I did panic last night when I received the letter, I've had a sleepless night and just want it gone so did think about paying it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that's why we call them vanishing windscreen tickets and another reason why they leave things for as long as possible, people move, people forget, paperwork gets destroyed.

 

As I say, this could get interesting later on .

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they are a nasty venal bunch of scrotes [I am in a good mood today so being kind to them ] do you not think that if they had a strong case against you they would have taken you to Court long ago?

 

Well remembered about the questionnaire-that should help your case. I don't suppose you can remember what company was asking the questions.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it does smell of the make them wet themselves so they will pay up the overinfl;ated syum, and the interest they should not have as thery left it until last minute to make claim. Wonder if the Code of practice and its inevitable impact means they are sifting old invoices to try it on before their pig killed for them?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the others.  As well as sending the CPR request to the solicitors, send a SAR to Defence Systems Ltd.  This will at least let you get to the bottom of what went on and which address they've been writing to.  Stick in some I.D. like a council tax bill otherwise they will use lack of I.D. to delay compliance.  Get free Certificates of Posting from the post office for both.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...