Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aviva fraudulently processed my data without authorisation o


Titchytitch
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just feel like im going round in circles no one is willing to listen

Nope he won't put it in writing even though he knows full well what he's done but I'm a bit perplexed as to why Aviva have stopped sending me default notices last one received was Dec 4th 2021

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Aviva may have noted the debts as not recoverable at the moment

Next likely action, is they pass the debts to a Debt Collection Agency (DCA) and you will again be faced with having to advise them about what has happened.

If the debts are on your credit record, you can contact the credit references to place notes against the debts, stating the debts are disputed and subject to fraud reporting (note any reference numbers you may have from Action Fraud or Police).  This is a useful action as any DCA should see these notes.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Never assume, unless they write to you stating they have written off.  

You may have to keep checking for several years.  

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If you don't have a document scanner at home  they are not expensive. I bought an all in one printer/scanner for about £40. 

Once you have the documents saved on your computer or tablet as a PDF document, you can email these to ICO. 

But see if you can contact them to explain what you are wanting from them (not the fraud side, but Data Protection Act adherence by Aviva) and what documents you can share with them. Ask if you can email these.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Possible letter in response to ICO

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xxxx.

I am not expecting the ICO to consider any aspects that relate to fraud, as anything involving

criminality needs to be investigated by the Police.

What I am requiring of the ICO is to review whether Aviva have fully met the requirements of the Data Protection Act and GDPR.

The key question is, have Aviva acted lawfully in processing data ?

I refer to the ICO publication online concerning lawful processing of data.

A guide to lawful basis | ICO

 

Please have a go at writing some questions regarding a)consent, b)contract, c)legal obligation. Don't worry about d to f.

For consent, Aviva did not have your consent as you were not involved in taking out any Insurance policies.  If this is correct, you could ask. How did Aviva gain the consent of the Policyholder ('Data subject') in arranging Insurance policies, when the 'Data Subject' had zero involvement in arranging any Insurance policies with Aviva, so had no opportunity to offer any consent  ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you soo much!

 

contract- the terms ot agreement werent sent to myself but were emailed electronically to an email address that wasnt even mine. Question to Aviva is, did they carry out sufficient checks to ensure that the actions they were taking were lawful under DPA/GDPR ?

Legal obligation

- electronic acceptance was taken but it wasn't my own acceptance as the email the documents were sent to wasn't mine and I was entered into a credit agreement without my knowledge ,  payments for the policy were made from another bank account not my own.

At no point was I spoken with throughout the policy so basic DPA wasn't even exercised.

Did Aviva employees handling the policy arrangements fully comply with Avivas own guidance which would have been drawn up to meet requirements under DPA/GDPR

What did the guidance Aviva employees follow actually state at the time in xx/xx/xxxx when a third party was arranging Insurance in someone's else's name ? 

Did Avivas guidance suggest referral to Avivas Data Protection Officer when there were any concerns about processing policies and data ?

  is this ok to add to the above letter so I can reply please x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have added questions to the above.

 

 

And remember to add that a subject access request disclosure from Aviva revealed that a customer adviser from Aviva raised concerns about setting up an Insurance policy to a Team Leader, as the person calling was not going to be the policyholder ('data subject'). The Team Leader decided to allow the policy and data to be processed.  Question from this is. Did the Aviva Team Leader fully consider whether the processing of data was going to be lawful, when they could not verify consent had been given by the 'data subject' ?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

response from ICO 

Thank you for your email of 13 June 2022. We still require the evidence as outlined in my previous email to show that you have raised the issue with Aviva yourself, and fully exhausted their complaints process. Ideally we also need a copy of their response to you. 

As an independent regulator, we cannot raise complaints with organisations without individuals raising them first. Please see our guidance here: Raising a complaint with an organisation | ICO

Once I have this, I will look at your case again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thought that you had already raised this complaint with Aviva ?

If not, you will need to raise a complaint with Aviva under the DPA/GDPR.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...