Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for your responses.  I feel a little bit better now.  I really got the wind put up me when I read about 'bad character and reprehensible behaviour of non-defendant witnesses' and the press guidelines from the Independent Press Standards Organisation. court-reporting-public.pdf (ipso.co.uk) Reporting Restrictions in the Criminal Courts (July 2023) (judiciary.uk) It's a tricky one because, without going into too much detail, all of the victims are of bad character already, otherwise they never would have met the accused, and I fear that the very much tumultuous relationship I have had with the victim that connects me to this case is going to be broadcast for all to hear. The accused isn't going to be anonymous, his name and even his home address were reported in the national press in the preliminaries.    Thank you.
    • How long is the finance arrangement for and how much has been paid?
    • From their own terms and conditions on the website... https://www.carfinance247.co.uk/terms-and-conditions 6.1 CarFinance247 Limited offers a: 6.1.1  web chat service ("Web Chat"); and 6.1.2  SMS chat service ("SMS Chat"), which, provided your application for finance has been approved and you have created a MyCarFinance247 account in accordance with these Terms, enable you to chat either online or via text message (as applicable) to one of our customer service specialists, without having to make a phone call.
    • I've had a text and email from MCB: "Dear XXXXX Please contact us today. Your payment has not been brought up to date and we would like to discuss your account with you as a matter of urgency. Our telephone number is 02039236888"   " Early investigations confirm you are resident at the above address. Despite this, we have not managed to speak to you about your now, seriously overdue debt.   We are now instructing our external debt collectors to contact you directly in relation to your loan account. If you want to avoid this course of action, contact us today on 0203 923 6888"
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell Claim form - old Newday Debenhams mastercard card debt


MadMat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 103 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received this from my local county court a couple of weeks ago,  hung on to see what Overdales could come up with,  and yesterday another bumper pack from Overdales containing another copy of the "Credit agreement", default notice etc that are already attached to this thread.   Nothing new from overdales.

 

 

 

cmc 17-5-23 10-00am 15 minutes.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

so can we just confirm things to date 

 

the DN is compliant. cant argue about that

they have a NOA

 

the agreement posted to date have NO sign up box, typed name nor IP address?

and this WAS an online sign up ...do you remember?

your correct (for time of take out) address is at the top? 

 

and when did you take this out please?

 

interesting the claimform is for a credit card debt but that N157 says loan?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement has my correct name and address typed into the areas I've blanked out

There is no IP address.

 

I've just noticed that this bundle has an extra page in the credit agreement that wasn't provided before. it has a tickbox, and a date/time.  

the quality isn't my scanning, the original they provide is blurred

 

It was signed up online, November 2018

 

 

 

 

extrapage.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

do that takeout date tally with the info on your credit file?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've received another huge bundle of paperwork from Overdales labeled "Hearing Bundle"  it appears to be yet another copy of the same stuff they've already sent me 3 times.  Doesn't appear to be anything new in it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just making sure you have their witness statement? is it? for the hearing on the 17th i expect?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume so. The covering letter just says "hearing Bundle".  and references the claim number.

What happens at a CMC?   I assume no final decision will be made,  the Judge will just be deciding what happens next?

Do I need to do anything except show up and answer any questions ? 

I assume my argument is simply that there is no enforceable CCA in that bundle.

Thanks

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

according to the court order date 5th APR 

there is/was no requirement for them to file directions?

 

id make sure you check CVP is working by 10am. weds

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court sets the directions in small claims track not the claimant...which will be done after the CMC providing the court is happy with what the claimant has disclosed following the notice dated 5th April 2023

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup there was no requirement for either side to submit draft directions.  All part of the general plan to try to intimidate me and drown me in paperwork I guess.

 

I've done the test CVP conference OK. and have the link for the live conference in my in-box.  That has instructions not to join untill 10 mins before.  

 

I think I'm all set!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that was a lot less scary than I thought it'd be!!  All over in under 5 mins!

Case to be listed for a Dispute Resolution Hearing.  Date TBA

I have to file a witness statement 14 days before the date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

open

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've received a date of 2nd Feb for the hearing.   I've never done a witness statement before,  is there a guide to doing one anywhere ?

 

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

and what have you been doing in the last 7mts.? CAG is predominantly self help - no there are NO templates nor guides BUT...

there are 100's of 'card claimform witness statement' (s) already here

use our enhanced google searchbox for the above.

it has to be filed 14 days BEFORE the hearing date.

post up your ideas and we will help.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Propsed witness statment

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD CLAIMANT

 

and

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx DEFENDANT

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

WITNESS STATEMENT OF xxxxxxxxxx

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I, xxxxxxxxxx WILL SAY as follows:

 

I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed 10p to 15p in the £1 and to which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Lowell Portfolio I Ltd issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.

 

2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.

 

BACKGROUND

 

3. The Claim relates to an alleged Credit Card Agreement between the defendant and Newday LTD

 

4.  Whilst it is accepted that the defendant has in the past had financial dealings with Newday, the defendant is unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers, and the defendant has not entered into any contract with the Claimant.

 

5. On the 18th January 2023, I received a claim form from Northampton County Court Business Centre, Northampton, for the amount of £xxxxxx. The claimant contends that the claim is for the sum of £xxxxx in respect of monies owing under an alleged agreement with the account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA). Contained within the claimants particulars the claimant states that the account was subject to assignment from Newday to Lowell on 22nd April 2021 with notice given.

 

 

6.  The defendant made a formal written request to the Claimant for them to provide me with a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement as entitled to do so under sections 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on the 27th January 2023 along with the standard fee of £1.00 postal order.

 

7. The defendant received a reply with no CCA attached other than the documents which enclosed a statement and a credit card application form.  A notice of assignment from Newday to Lowell was received separate to the above documentation

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

8. To date no valid full copy of the executed agreement or terms & conditions have been disclosed.

 

9. Therefore the Claimant remains in default of the original section 78 request dated 27th January 2023 and pursuant to section 78 6a of the CCA1974 the claimant is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

 

The claim bought by the claimant is spurious and speculative. The claimant does not have possession of the correct valid paperwork and this is an attempt to mislead and convince the court that the claimant can disclose the legal valid documents on which its claim relies on. It is therefore requested that the Claimants Claim is struck out for the above reasons.

 

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

 

I, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx the defendant, believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of Court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

 

 Signed: ……………………………………………

 

 Print Name: xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Dated: DDMMYY

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...