Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A) Bollards, or B) county court action for trespass onto your private land, or C) retain one of the private parking firms, ensuring that they'll offer to take payment for the private parking space(s) on your land. (What you don't want is for them to put up signs saying "no parking" ... as then there can't be a contract to park to be broken .... read up on the parking threads to see what can be used to get out of such a private parking charge....) The PPC offers parking, with the proviso that a) they pay, and b) they provide contact numbers for the cars to be moved when needed. Make the payment required sufficient that it isn't attractive to them to chose to park there (& pay)....... Bollards may not be the cheapest option, but it will likely be the simplest / most effective.
    • You need to choose between ET and small claims, you cannot do both. For straightforward wages I'd go small claims. Faster and less messing about. Advice here Employment claims in the civil courts - Working Families WORKINGFAMILIES.ORG.UK Some types of employment-related claims can be brought in the civil courts, rather than in an Employment Tribunal. This advice page offers a high level...  
    • The garages are used - just car currently being fixed.  I have no need of what they offer.  It is conscious trespass - and the law allows. Which is frustrating.  It's just v annoying that they do this. Isn't there a law that someone cannot prevent access to a public highway from private land?
    • The problem with sending it too early is that Jake might try to write something called a Supplemental Witness Statement to undermine yours.  It would be better to send yours right on the court's deadline. The problem is that we don't know when that is.  In 90% of cases it's 14 days before the court's deadline, so 21/06.  However, in the odd case the judge decides differently.  
    • Signs and notes on windscreens wouldn't deter me either. after all. it's private land and very little deterrent to stop drivers from abusing it. A physical barrier, IMHO is the only way you will stop them abusing it.....or, depending on what businesses they are, why not rent out your garage to them, ask them for a staff discount if you purchase anything from them? Whilst it is irksome, how much money have you got to throw at it, and is it really that important in your life? If you were using your garage, different story.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vodafone


budg
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi - I'm new to CAG and realise that the focus is primarily on Banks and recovery of Bank charges.... Am hoping to find some help and support however, for a problem of a different nature...

 

It relates to an £11 000 bill from Vodafone over a period of 2 months for supposed internet usage on a 3G Mobile Datacard..!!

 

It's quite a long story, but I have refused to pay for a number of reasons:-

1. The usage was a result of spyware on my laptop and not therefore my usage

2. I was supposedly on a Vodafone "Unlimited" package anyway

3. It is physically impossible at the stated connection speed to have downloaded the quantity of data Vodafone claim

4. Vodafone didn't bother to advise or do anything about the excess usage until it was too late... (no timely warning in other words..)

 

Vodafone have simply said they will offer a 50% reduction, but are not interested in my arguments...

 

Has anyone else had a similar experience and can anyone advise what to expect next (presumably this will go to court..)

 

Many thanks

 

Budg:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just some observations - whether it was 'spyware' or not, the fact you remain liable for all phone usage of your device is long-established. The network were simply processing the the demands made of it by their customer (you, and by extension - your phone). Just as people are held liable for all calls made from their handset when it is stolen until switched off, the fact an errant program you downloaded initiated the data traffic is not enough to get Vodafone to cancel the bill.

 

The term 'Unlimited' is always to be read in conjunction with what their definition of unlimited actually means, there will be a 'fair use' policy where a limit is quantified, HOWEVER, it is not unreasonable to expect that when this limit is reached you are at least advised that you now fall outwith of the 'free' usage due to excessive data traffic. Did they ever do this? If not, that can be a useful challenge.

 

Whether the data load can be justified leaves it up to Vodafone to provide full itemisation of the data volume, if a 3G handset, the volumes can build up very quickly. Even so, as this is clearly a fraiud perpetrated on you - Vodafone should be able to provide you with a full breakdown in order for the true costs to be assessed (this is before any 'bundled' reductions).

 

Their offer of a 50% reduction is fairly standard in dispute cases like this, and you clearly have a right to recover your costs from the spyware operator - if you can identify them. Was it a UK enterprise?

 

If I was in this situation and did NOT get a data overload warning despite being on the Unlimited tariff, I would expect Vodafone to be jointly and severally liable for the usage, but in the absence of any notice of vast data volumes, I feel you have a good case to have the costs refunded in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments... I know I am liable in terms of my contract but maintain Vodafone should certainly have advised me a lot sooner... The "Fair Use" Policy (and I could not find any previous reference to it although their web site has just been revised) was 1GB per month and the charge thereafter £1 per Mb. The £11000 therefore relates to about 11GB of data (give or take a few GB) As a matter of interest their web site now says "If a customer's usage is in excess of this (1GB) we may ask them to moderate their usage........ and if they fail to do so we reserve the right to change the price plan or charge..... etc etc"

At no time did I receive any warning from them that I had reached or was exceeding the Fair Use... So I maintain they have a responsibility as well (more than just 50%..)

The second interesting thing is that after about 3 months I received an itemised bill from them showing that the PC had connected every minute and downloaded 3Mb of data... I have written to them querying this because on a 384Kb connection it is physically impossible to download that much in 1 minute. In fact on Vodafone's own web site is a speed comparison which shows that on a 384Kb 3G Connection such as mine, a 450Kb document can be downloaded in 60 seconds.. So I SERIOUSLY doubt the accuracy of their billing process - don't know what went wrong, but my PC could not have downloaded the volumes they claim in that time...

I have drawn these two facts to Vodafone's attention in writing, and tried to involve Otelo (not sure yet of their response)

I suspect however that I will get nowhere and this will end up in court - do you know what Vodafone's next move is likely to be... (I have been paying my normal mobile 'phone bill although they have suspended the service)

Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually the ICSTIS link isn't relevant on this occasion as the OP's post refers to data volume (Transfer) charges, not the cost of connecting to a data service that uses a premium rate number regulated by ICSTIS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, thanks to rosiecotton for sending the link but it does refer more to premium rate telephone calls, although the principle is the same - some software installed on my PC without my knowledge was doing the connecting.... Don't know or can't prove who.. Incidentally, I do have an up to date anti-virus and anti-spam, but this is a new breed of spyware or malware that can download a small piece of trojan software on your pc when you either open an email attachment or visit a web site...

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah I see - I'm not the most technical of people!

 

That new spyware sounds pretty nasty, and quite scary to think you can get caught even with up to date protection.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I noted - they have to at least inform you of being moved 'off inclusive' and as they haven't done this you have a strong case. Can I correct one misconception, the 3G 348kb connection... I have been able to transfer a 1Mb file in 22 seconds, so 3Mb in a minute IS achievable, using theior 3G Datacard. Since Vodafone say the maximum for can transfer in a month within the biundle is 1Gb, to let you reach 11Gb without comment is most unusual.

 

Their usual tactic is to bass the matter to a DCA if the bill is unpaid, but they rarely do this if you flag a dispute in WRITING, and ask them to investigate further. I have to ask though - was the Spyware simply a generic one for PC/Laptops, which used any available IP connection, or was it targeted at the Data Card...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's very interesting about the speed.. They do have a relatively new 3G service that runs up to 1.4Mb - could that be what you have? Mine seemed to be much slower...

The spyware was a generic one for PC's - I didn't investigate too much further but did get a letter from two companies confirming they had inspected the laptop and in their opinion the spyware was responsible, but the one removed the spyware from the machine so I couldn't investigate further and Vodafone's records seem only to show the fact that the PC connected - not where it went...

The problem about notifying me I strongly suspect is that their billing system is a little antiquated and runs in arrears and by the time they noticed something and advised me, the damage was already done... I wonder if they have changed their web site partly as a result of the problem I have highlighted...

Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is now a new breed of software specifically designed to combat this kind of threat - very worthwhile installing if you spend a lot of time on the internet as I do..:)

 

 

oh yeah? where can i get this from?

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Another point: I am an ex-employee of Vodafone and I know that their systems would usually start barring the service if the usage is different from "the norm". You could argue that the system should have kicked in. It's called a "Stolen Bar" and is supposed to halt theives running up huge bills.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately my dispute with Vodafone has been resolved and the £11000 written off. I had no success trying to resolve it directly - Vodafone were not co-operative nor were they willing to negotiate (I had at one time offered something by way of settlement) I contacted the Ombudsman who took up the matter on my behalf and Vodafone eventually agreed not to pursue it. I suspect part of the reason was that they (Vodafone) had allowed the bill to reach that amount without any effort to contact me or curtail the service (the £11000 was spread over 2 months) and steadfastly all but ignored the numerous letters I wrote.

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...