Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Boris Johnson, former Prime Minister


Recommended Posts

Early release from the initial covid lockdown due to the speedy vaccine rollout whilst EU dithered 

The ability to quickly send weapons to Ukraine whist Germany offered 5000 helmets and Napoleon did his Neville Chamberlain impersonation 

Close relative now having bought 3 bed house due to his employer now having to pay wages that recognise his skills ,as they are now being unable to rely on cheap EU labour 

Of course lots more needs to be done 

Get fracking ASAP, ignore the Swampies and beard and sandal brigade and use agricultural land for food production not for unsightly solar farms and stop turning the countryside into a giant theme park 

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

Early release from the initial covid lockdown due to the speedy vaccine rollout whilst EU dithered 

 

Absolutely nothing to do with Brexit

 

19 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

The ability to quickly send weapons to Ukraine

 

Absolutely nothing to do with Brexit, and Sweden sent more and faster, as did the USA among others - they just didn't bull themselves up doing it like Johnson the liar did

 

19 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

Close relative now having bought 3 bed house due to his employer now having to pay wages that recognise his skills ,as they are now being unable to rely on cheap EU labour 

 

Thats good money for a cabbage picker - or horse manure spreader

Wheres the details for some sort of credibility?

 

 

19 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

Of course lots more needs to be done 

Get fracking ASAP, ignore the Swampies and beard and sandal brigade and use agricultural land for food production not for unsightly solar farms

 

and stop turning the countryside into a giant theme park 

 

 

Thats more like a Brexiter

 

Now how about some real benefits .. other than people like water companies being allowed to doodoo on everyone for profits that will go abroad

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theoldrouge said:

Early release from the initial covid lockdown due to the speedy vaccine rollout whilst EU dithered 

The ability to quickly send weapons to Ukraine 

 

Erm, neither were controlled by the EU and we could have done exactly the same as we did if we'd remained in the EU.

 

So neither are 'Brexit benefits'.

 

 

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So @theoldrougeas you are struggling to find any legitimate benefits to anyone .. I'll help

 

So, given that rampant Brexhiters like Smugg and deadwood moved chunks of their own businesses to the EU or abroad (dyson, JCB), despite railing on (lying) about how great Brexhit would be for UK 'business'

- Apart from that they wanted hard Brexhit with a bonfire of regs and protections so they could profit from modern slavery working conditions and poisoning Englands once green and pleasant land for profit (as you also promote) while they live in protected estates or abroad

 

So what 'businesses' have actually benefited from leaving the EU - and I'm not talking about a few lorry drivers, I'm talking BIGtime benefited (bigger than Energy company profiteering)?

 

Clue: What were the EU implementing. and have been rapidly implementing since the UK and its resistance to it left?

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL

Quite true HB - but the populist tories are trying to end that aren't they

 

.. and its arguable that situation is mostly maintaining benefits rather than losing like the rest of us ?

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other third, Rees-mogg/Redwood investments and suchlike, have moved to the EU ... ?

 

... 1% (eg DUP enterprises) is jumping up and down shouting - stop these godless heathens making money and bring them back under the control of our God given English masters or rot in hellfire and damnation for eternity

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Ethel Street said:

 

Erm, neither were controlled by the EU and we could have done exactly the same as we did if we'd remained in the EU.

 

So neither are 'Brexit benefits'.

 

 

Absolute nonsense from obviously another obsessive remainer

Do you not think that we would have had to conform with everything the EU ordered 

The main at risk groups were vaccinated 

before the EU got its act together 

As for weapons as I said ,we acted whilst the Germans were offering helmets and Napoleon was doing his Neville Chamberlain impersonation 

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

Do you not think that we would have had to conform with everything the EU ordered

 

LOL - no, we didn't

and we were a significant part of both making the rules and blocking any we didn't like, as you would see if you put some effort into answering my question rather than just spouting nonsense.

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tobyjugg2 said:

So @theoldrougeas you are struggling to find any legitimate benefits to anyone .. I'll help

 

So, given that rampant Brexhiters like Smugg and deadwood moved chunks of their own businesses to the EU or abroad (dyson, JCB), despite railing on (lying) about how great Brexhit would be for UK 'business'

- Apart from that they wanted hard Brexhit with a bonfire of regs and protections so they could profit from modern slavery working conditions and poisoning Englands once green and pleasant land for profit (as you also promote) while they live in protected estates or abroad

 

So what 'businesses' have actually benefited from leaving the EU - and I'm not talking about a few lorry drivers, I'm talking BIGtime benefited (bigger than Energy company profiteering)?

 

Clue: What were the EU implementing. and have been rapidly implementing since the UK and its resistance to it left?

Actually the relative works in a profession that without him and others like him your life would grind to a halt

I am pleased to say his life has improved enormously as a direct consequence of Brexit

As for polluting the countryside do you not think that solar panels spread far and wide over prime agricultural land, that will one day end up in landfill, already achieve that

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

Absolute nonsense from obviously another obsessive remainer

Do you not think that we would have had to conform with everything the EU ordered 

The main at risk groups were vaccinated 

before the EU got its act together 

As for weapons as I said ,we acted whilst the Germans were offering helmets and Napoleon was doing his Neville Chamberlain impersonation 

 

 

Not nonsense and pointing out that you are wrong about how the EU works in relation to public health and military matters doesn't make anyone either obsessive or a remainer. They are 'national competencies' and the EU does not control them.  

  • Like 1
  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theoldrouge said:

Actually the relative works in a profession that without him and others like him your life would grind to a halt

I am pleased to say his life has improved enormously as a direct consequence of Brexit

 

Yep, like I said, lorry drivers. valuable and essential folk in the UK and around the world have done well out of the Brexit backlash.

 

 

1 hour ago, theoldrouge said:

As for polluting the countryside do you not think that solar panels spread far and wide over prime agricultural land, that will one day end up in landfill, already achieve that

 

prime agricultural land!  - horse- hogwash - maybe a couple where the populist Tory landowner got some special deal.

Spouting garbage just shows that Brexhiters seem to run on soundbites, without any capacity or will to validate the rubbish they hoover up and regurgitate.

 

In any case - you not heard about the crops rotting in the fields through

1. No migrant workers to pick them

2. Climate change devastating whats there.

3. Reduced more expensive export markets due to Johnson & cos Brexhit

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Sunak made comments to grassroots Tories in Tunbridge Wells, Kent, last month

 

"In the video, Mr Sunak told Tory supporters: "I managed to start changing the funding formulas, to make sure areas like this (wealthy Tory shire) are getting the funding they deserve because we inherited a bunch of formulas from Labour that shoved all the funding into deprived urban areas and that needed to be undone.

"I started the work of undoing that.""

"boasting about diverting funding away from “deprived urban areas” towards more prosperous areas that “deserve” them."

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ethel Street said:

 

Not nonsense and pointing out that you are wrong about how the EU works in relation to public health and military matters doesn't make anyone either obsessive or a remainer. They are 'national competencies' and the EU does not control them.  

Oh really “France 24 “wrong as well then about The European Health Union 

 

Before Covid-19, the EU left health policy to national governments. However, Brussels took charge of vaccine procurement in the summer of 2020, as part of what Von der Leyen called a “European Health Union” in her September “State of the Union” address.

Member states were free to opt out of this supranational scheme, but none did so. Brexit made it “easy” for the UK to go its own way on vaccines, Bouzou observed.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Corrected

 

 

“Yep, like I said, lorry drivers. valuable and essential folk in the UK and around the world have done well out of Brexit “

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

Corrected

 

 

“Yep, like I said, lorry drivers. valuable and essential folk in the UK and around the world have done well out of Brexit “

 

If they're working in the UK, yes. I don't think the ones doing international trips are all that happy.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

Oh really “France 24 “wrong as well then about The European Health Union 

 

Before Covid-19, the EU left health policy to national governments. However, Brussels took charge of vaccine procurement in the summer of 2020, as part of what Von der Leyen called a “European Health Union” in her September “State of the Union” address.

35 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

Member states were free to opt out of this supranational scheme, but none did so.

 

 

So what part of that are you choosing to misunderstand

- Seems pretty easy and straightforward

 

.. and how did the populists Indian 'partners' respond when they were authorised to manufacture the vaccine in India

- kept them didn't they?

..mind you that was after Johnson tried to do it to the EU - what comes around eh?

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, theoldrouge said:

 

Thank you. But there came a time about a year ago when the UK was overtaken, so it's swings and roundabouts.

 

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Malta, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Denmark and Ireland overtake UK in fully jabbed percentages

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theoldrouge said:

Oh really “France 24 “wrong as well then about The European Health Union 

 

Before Covid-19, the EU left health policy to national governments. However, Brussels took charge of vaccine procurement in the summer of 2020, as part of what Von der Leyen called a “European Health Union” in her September “State of the Union” address.

Member states were free to opt out of this supranational scheme, but none did so. Brexit made it “easy” for the UK to go its own way on vaccines, Bouzou observed.

 

 

Thank you for confirming exactly what I said. If we'd still been in the EU we could, and no doubt would, have done exactly the same as we did do and the EU couldn't have stopped us or made us do anything different.

 

And as you also confirm no EU state was required to join the the voluntary support scheme the EU put together. Of course few of them opted out. Very few EU countries have their own global pharmaceutical industry or vaccine research facilities. Malta or Cyprus or Bulgaria (for example) were hardly likely to start developing their own vaccine research and pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity in the middle of a pandemic were they? So of course they opted to go with an an EU led purchasing programme.

 

If you don't mind me saying so you seem to be rather missing the point. No-one disputes that the UK had a successful vaccine rollout programme. The point is that it would have had just as successful a programme if we were still in the EU. Brexit is irrelevant to the success of the rollout.

 

And anyway the EU programme was about procurement, buying the vaccines, not about rollout. Every EU country, even when it stayed in the procurement programme, made its own decisons about rollout.

 

Incidentally did you notice that the France24 article was published right back in the early days of the pandemic - 6th February 2021 - so isn't an assessment of the overall strengths and weaknesses of anyone's  vaccine roll out? Britain's early lead was soon eroded.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@theoldrouge

 

and just in case you still refuse to see even after the rational explanation of @Ethel Street, (or simply didn't bother reading all the 'words')

take the word of an apparent rabid, single minded, fracking supporting, EU hating brexhiters' soundbites:

 

22 hours ago, theoldrouge said:

 

Do you not think that we would have had to conform with everything the EU ordered 

 

 

16 hours ago, theoldrouge said:

 

Member states were free to opt out of this supranational scheme

 

 

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...