Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EVRi lost my package - court claim issued ***Settled in Full***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was going to send this back

 

Good afternoon Ilyas,

 
As stated previously in my letter of claim dated the 25th of May, under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act of 1999, I have the right to claim this compensation directly with yourselves. You have again denied me this right.
 
Tomorrow the 8th of June will mark the 14th day for you to try and resolve this.
 
If Hermes have not issued me a total refund of £161 by close of play tomorrow I will be going ahead on the 9th of June and opening a case with the small claims court to recover the funds that way.
 
Regards
Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I've had a look at it – and that's fine.

Sorry about the delay but I was using a device and I couldn't read it properly and I wanted to doublecheck.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they're certainly sticking to their guns. I'll make the claim through money claim tomorrow.

 

Dear ,
 
Thank you for getting in touch with us regarding parcel xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
 
I am sorry that you are not happy with the response unfortunately, as this was sent through Packlink and not Hermes directly you would need to contact them for a claim.
 
I do apologise for the inconvenience caused.
 
Kind Regards
 
Sarah Gregson
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Dear Sarah

You know and I know that under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 that I have full third party rights to sue you instead of Packlink.  
If you don't know this then you better have a word with somebody about your staff development because you should know.
If you do know then shame on you for trying to pull the wool over the eyes of your customers.
I'll be issuing proceedings tomorrow

Good luck

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the last response from them. I'm just about to write up the short statement required on money service, can you read it over before I send it BankFodder?

 

Good Afternoon
 
Thank you for getting in touch regarding the recent parcel delivery reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
 
My name is Tasawar and I respond to complaints on behalf of the Executive Office. I have been asked to follow up your complaint in the absence of my colleague.
 
Firstly, I would like to start by offering my apologies on behalf of Hermes upon hearing that your recipient has not received the parcel.
 
Can I please advise as per your contractual agreement you will need to raise this matter further with Packlink as your contractual agreement is with them and not Hermes. Hermes is in a contractual agreement with Packlink who contracted us to complete this delivery.
 
As you have advised that you will be taking further legal action all future correspondence will need to be made in writing from your legal team to the below address.
 
Legal department
Hermes Parcelnet Ltd
Capitol House
1 Capitol Close
Morley
LS27 0WH
 
I would like to advise I will now be closing down this complaint and allow for you to proceed further via the legal team.
 
Again I sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused.
 
Kind regards,
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, issue the claim – but everything should have been prepared by now especially the particulars of claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to put any further details than this BankFodder?

 

Hermes incident ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Parcel ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

On the 25/04/2021 I sold an Xbox One S to the value of £161 on eBay and used Packlink to send the item via Hermes.

 

The package was picked up from the collection point and scanned by Hermes, after this point I no longer received any updates.

 

01/05/2021 I contacted Packlink and they advised I should submit a lost item claim, I submitted this with Packlink on the 04/05/21.

 

06/05/21 Packlink contacted me to advise the item had been deemed as lost and that I would only receive standard compensation (£20) as I had not paid for the additional compensation.

 

12/05/21 I then contacted Hermes directly to request full compensation of the loss of the package as they had not fulfilled their contractual obligation of delivering the package.

 

13/05/21 they contacted me to say after an extensive search of the depot the package could not be found.

 

15/05/21 Hermes called me and advised they hadn’t actually searched the depot and would do so.

 

19/05/21 I was contacted again advising after an extensive search they could not find the item.

 

25/05/21 I issued a letter of claim to Hermes for a total refund of the £161 for the loss of the item.

 

26/05/21 Hermes contacted me to advise they would do another search of the warehouse.

 

07/06/21 Hermes declared that they had received no response from the hub team and that the package was deemed lost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

The claimant used the defendant's delivery service to send an item value £161 to a UK address. Defendant' s reference number XXX. The defendant lost the item. The claimant is suing on the basis of the Contracts (Rights of Third Party) Act 1999 as a beneficial third party. The court is invited to exercise its powers under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 to examine the fairness or otherwise of the defendant's terms and conditions with particular reference to their requirement that it is the customer who must purchase insurance to protect themselves against the defendant's own negligence or criminality of their employees.   The claimant seeks reimbursement of £161+ £XXX delivery costs plus interest.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey Bankfodder, just an update. Hermes acknowledged my claim and said they would defend the claim on the 16th of this month, still heard nothing from them, I think they have 28 days to file a defence so I’m sure they’ll wait til as late as they can.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey Bankfodder, I've got my notice of proposed allocation to the small claims track as Hermes has defended the claim, I'm fine with everything else on the N180 form (ticked yes for mediation) the only problem I have is the fact that it's asking for a local county court, but I'm in Scotland and we don't have county courts. Do you have any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm putting up a call to my site team colleague @Andyorch

 

Please will you put up the defence in PDF format. It's probably the same as the rest of them but you never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thanks. The usual rubbish trying to pass the buck onto pack link even though they are fully aware of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.

Hermes usual abuse and unfair treatment of their customers and as usual simply exploiting our excellent County Court service which comes them free of charge in order to frustrate your legitimate claim.

Stick by your guns.

When it goes to mediation, stand your ground. Read up the mediation stories on this sub- forum and let us know when you get the mediation date

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I did feel like they're just trying to spin it out as much as possible to see if I'll drop it but there's no chance of that. As much as I'd like to get my money back it's more about the principal of it and the fact they think they can get away with it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

the only problem I have is the fact that it's asking for a local county court, but I'm in Scotland and we don't have county courts.

 

On the DQ N180...leave it blank  MCOL will allocate it to the defendants court ...I assume you have no desire to attend and offer your evidence pursuant to CPR 27.9

 

Its important you submit your evidence with a cover note once you get the courts directions and refer to CPR 27.9 that you will not be in attendance but will rely on papers alone.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part27#27.9

 

 

Andy

 

 

.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi all,

 

I know it's been a while but that's because I've pretty much been waiting patiently for the case to go to mediation as money claim told me that's what was going to happen.

I called money claim last month and found out it should have definitely went to mediation by now and they said they'd sort it, however instead they've transferred it to the court, so I've had a letter asking me to set out the basis of bringing a claim in the UK courts and I have 14 days to reply.

I really didn't expect it to go to court, I expected a resolution through mediation so I don't even know where to begin with this now.

 

Thanks

Edited by toyschoketoys
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please would you post a letter here .

 

Also, it will be very helpful if you wouldn't make your posts in a solid block of text .

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

The claimants claim is based on the defendants breach of contract .

The defendant is a courier company which agreed to carry a parcel belonging to the claimant to a UK address .

The parcel contained a XXX and the value was declared at £xxx.

The defendants tracking number was XXX and the parcel will send on xxx date

The defendant has filed a defence to the claim and their only defence is that there was no contract between me and them .

This is correct. I used a parcel broker called packlink .

However, I am suing the defendant as an entitled third party under the contract open ( rights of third parties) act.

This act of parliament gives me as a named beneficiary or within a discernible class of beneficiaries, the rights to bring a action for breach of contract as if I was a direct contracting partner .

Therefore, I respectfully suggest that I have a statutory right to bring my action for breach of contract against the defendant .

The defendant has not defended on any other issues .

I would respectfully submit that if the court agrees that I am entitled as a third party to bring this action as if I was a direct contracting party, then judgement must be given to me as the defendant has not raised any other issues in their defence .

Statement of truth.

Signed.

Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quote

 

 

Quote

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...