Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Question about ESA ending


mafiaduck
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1142 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My father is currently in receipt of ESA, he is 64, 65 in May, retires at 66. He has a private pension, which is active, all payments are known by ESA, and it leaves him with an ESA (and enhanced disability) payment of £57.86per week.

HE recently received a letter from ESA, to say that from the 7th of April, he would no longer be entitled to any money or ESA help, because of a change of money coming in. His pension is increasing this year, by a whole £2.37 a week. So why would he lose the other £55.49? it also says on the letter that he has not got enough years of tax payments... but he has 43 full years. Then it says that they used tax year 2016-17 to determine his eligibility.

 

In 2016-17, he had full tax credit payment as he was on ESA the whole of the year. It was only 2017, and 2018 where he was short ever, and that was because his ESA was ended, then restarted, then ended, then he went on JSA, then that ended... and it was all held back until he went to tribunal, and then his ESA was reinstated. For some reason, about 12 weeks across the 2 years went missing for tax credits. But still, thats not 2016-17.

 

In 2016-17, that was the year his private pension began, so he's had his money monitored since then. So it's not like they looked at his income that year, and decided that he was earning too much. As its been the same for 5 years since, and checked each year. HE did have a small payout, of £6,750, which they were aware of, and until it went below £6k in savings his ESA was docked a few extra pounds per week.

I was confused, and rang ESA. Who told me that they had nothing on their system to say it was ending. (this was 10 days ago) but they would pass it to someone else who would know more and they'd call me in 48 hours. I never got that call, I called back, and got told they knew nothing of it, and again, it would be passed to someone who knew more and they'd call back. Heard nothing. Got no news over Easter Weekend, obviously, I called yesterday as soon as they were open. Got told it would be a 24 hour call back. Heard nothing, again.

Now, my dad gets paid every wednesday. He got paid last Wednesday, with his letter saying his benefit would end today... would he be paid a half amount this week? or would that appear next week, on his usual date, but for just half the amount?

 

Because he had no payment today, and as the ESA team seem incapable of getting the correct team to call me back, and because they say theres nothing on their part of the system to show his benefit ending... I'm hoping that the lack of payment shows that the letter was sent in mistake, everything will be continuing as normal, and that the  reason no one called back is because they dont see a point as there's nothing on their system to end it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rather than it being tax i think you mean National Insurance contributions?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your Father is unhappy about the actions of DWP/ESA then he might consider registering a complaint.  This would enable a complaints resolution manager to look into all of the information contained in your post, correct any errors if found and to respond by letter to him.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-work-pensions/about/complaints-procedure

 

DWP has many different departments dealing with different aspects of benefit administration. If they have sent a letter saying the benefit would be ending, this would appear to be a considered action and should be taken seriously.  Please don't make any assumptions.

 

Given the issues you mention, the complaints route sppears to be the correct action to take.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dx100uk said:

rather than it being tax i think you mean National Insurance contributions?

 

 

Yes! Sorry, thats exactly what I meant. I dont know why I was saying Tax.

Its his NI Contributions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the private pension and other income more than £140 a week ?   Was it just below £140 per week, before the recent increase ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

If your Father is unhappy about the actions of DWP/ESA then he might consider registering a complaint.  This would enable a complaints resolution manager to look into all of the information contained in your post, correct any errors if found and to respond by letter to him.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-work-pensions/about/complaints-procedure

 

DWP has many different departments dealing with different aspects of benefit administration. If they have sent a letter saying the benefit would be ending, this would appear to be a considered action and should be taken seriously.  Please don't make any assumptions.

 

Given the issues you mention, the complaints route sppears to be the correct action to take 

 

Thanks for the advice, I shall get on to submitting a complaint when I visit him tomorrow (support bubble). I always intended to take it seriously, and wouldnt just outright assume, I was just hoping to find an answer to ease his concerns whilst I played the game of going back and forth waiting for this call from the team who supposedly might know what was going on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

Is the private pension and other income more than £140 a week ?   Was it just below £140 per week, before the recent increase ?

 

its about £86 a week, and the recent increase takes it to roughly £89

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I have read. pension income above a certain level can mean no entitlement to ESA.  Ignore the £140 PW as that relates to employment earnings. Not sure what pension threshold amount is which would mean no ESA was due.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

From what I have read. pension income above a certain level can mean no entitlement to ESA.  Ignore the £140 PW as that relates to employment earnings. Not sure what pension threshold amount is which would mean no ESA was due.

 

Well like I said, they have known he has the pension for 5 years, and for 5 years have docked his ESA and disability premium with accordance to his pension. There shouldn't really be a limit where his extra £2 a week, means he loses £55 a week in ESA based on all previous contact with them. He's had this checked by them every April since he started getting it.

 

From how its worked out (Pension amount, minus 85, and then halved =deduction) the extra 2 a week, should at most deduct just £1.

Edited by mafiaduck
Link to post
Share on other sites

Same for UC too sadly..

My neighbours index linked Private pension increased slowly each year until he reached a threshold then bam his mrs lost all benefits. 

 

He is not alone. But its clearly stated in the criteria.

 

Dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it clearly stated though? What's clearly stated from everything I found, was that to get your ESA deduction, you take your monthly pension. Times by 12 for the year. Divide by 52 for your weekly amount. Minus 85 that you are allowed to have. Then whatever is left, you half it, and that is what is removed from your ESA entitlement. 

 

For my father, this worked out that he was losing a small portion of his ESA. As may be obvious from other posts, I'm not 100% sure on exact numbers... But it left him with nearly 60 a week from ESA. Based on ESAs methods that they worked it out with, his increase of £2 per week should see his ESA money reduced by just over a pound per week. 

 

He's hit no threshold, according to their calculations at every other stage. To hit it he would need an extra 55 per week, which he won't get until his other pension kicks in at 66.

 

So if there is some other threshold, that you think explains why a 2 pound increases negates 57 pound of ESA that is due, its certainly not been clearly stated to me. 

 

We expect his esa to end next year, when his pension kicks in in May. But he can't afford it now, especially as if they cut ESA they also remove his housing benefit and council tax reduction. So now that £2 per week loses him 55 esa, plus he needs an extra 500 for rent. 

 

Unless he still gets ESA, but just no payment from them, and his housing benefit stays attached. But again, that's not clearly explained, because his letter says they can't pay him... Not that he's not entitled to it. Where as before when he lost esa briefly it was a loss of entitlement letter. 

 

I'll be honest, the whole things annoyed me to the point of confusion. Mainly due to the lack of callbacks I've been promised and 3 different ESA agents telling me it's not cancelled, but it might be, and they don't know, which isn't helpful at all. 

 

Thanks for all the responses everyone. I think I'll go with the suggestion of filing a complaint, and in the waiting process for that, I'll also call every day and hope for that elusive call back. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...