Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
    • Just be careful with your language on what you post here - Keep it above board Lets see what you send to the big boss. 
    • I made that payment on 13th Feb, then it all went down hill. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EVRi Lost Parcel - Court Claim Issued **SETTLED AT MEDIATION**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You haven't included a reference number

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure that they will respond – but just in case, make sure that you keep a good diary note so that on or about day 14/15/16 you start checking up the County Court website to see whether you can apply for judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you. This is absolutely normal. If you read around you will probably even find some copies of their standard template defence. Also you will see how other people's similar stories have progressed similarly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again

 

I've been compiling my court documents today ready for potential court hearing. In one of the very first messages from Hermes they state

 

Quote

We're so sorry that despite an extensive investigation, we have not been able to locate your parcel.

 

 

I would like to draw on this point and ask them to provide evidence as to what their  'extensive investigation' comprised. Should I write to them and ask for this information in preparation, or wait until the mediation or hearing?

 

Thanks

Edited by stormfly
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you need to start compiling documents yet.

Please read the other stories on the sub- forum and you will see how it progresses. If it goes to mediation then you really won't need many documents at all – just simply a good grasp of your own situation and an understanding of the principles

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Bankfodder. Papers were issued 18th March and the date of service was deemed to be served was 23rd March.
The defendant responded with acknowledgement and asked for 28 days from date of Service to file a response.

 

28 days is up today ( if 23rd March is counted as day 1) and I have not received anything further from the defendant.

 

Can I now go ahead and request judgment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You shouldn't even be asking. You should be checking the money claim website regularly and applying for judgement the moment it lets you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

It has let me request judgement since day 14. However, as they responded with acknowledgement of service I thought I had to give them 28 days to file a defence as per their acknowledgement letter.

 

The letter stated they now had 28 days total, from date of service, to file a defence

Edited by stormfly
Link to post
Share on other sites

This shows that you haven't been doing your reading around the Hermes sub- forum. This question has come up several times and the answer is always the same, you should move in and apply for  judgement as soon as you possibly can. You don't need to ask for permission.

Until you apply for judgement there is still a chance that they could put in their defence even if it is beyond the deadline.

This means, that you might have allowed them to put in a defence while you were wondering whether or not to apply for judgement.

Big Fail

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm struggling to understand this.

The MCOL guidance was quite clear that I needed to give them 28 days if they sent acknowledgement of service. 

 

Notice of Issue  - 18th March

'The court sent it to the defendant by first class post on the 18th March and it will be deemed to be served on the 23rd March 2021"

 

Acknowledgement of Service - 22nd March

'An acknowledgement of Service to your claim has been filed today, which is attached for information. The defendant now has 28 days from the date of service of the claim to file a response"

 

Taking 28 days from the 23rd that takes us to 20th April. Please could you direct me to what I might be missing?

 

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you been to the money claim website and tried to apply for judgement?

If you haven't then do it now

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it feels that there is some barrier or reason why you shouldn't apply the judgement then it will simply stop you.

If it really is allowing you to apply for judgement now then do it. I'm not sure what the problem is.

Do you want to win your case against Hermes or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So have you applied? Or has it blocked you?

We are all on the edge of our seats

Link to post
Share on other sites

date top right on claimform +33 cal days (claimform date is ONE in the count) = 19th april. they had till 4pm today to fill a defence

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be surprised if tomorrow you are notified that there is a bar on the process – which means that they have filed the defence and you are now prevented from applying for judgement.

However, you should certainly try and if it allows you – then go ahead and apply. It has happened once or twice that Hermes had missed the deadline.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent well done.

It's strange because that is to people now who have managed to slip into the deadline. Very unusual that Hermes didn't get there first.

However, do appreciate that your application for judgement has to be processed and if Hermes managed to get their defence in before it has been processed, then there defence will take priority

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again, as you pointed out they managed to get a bar on the process and the Judgement was rejected.
I've received their defence and direct questionnaire today,-6 days late. Hermes really are a piece of work, I'll be making sure the mediator knows the lengths Hermes go to to crush their customers 😠
Now to fill in this questionnaire and get is sent back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please post up the defence in pdf format. I suppose it will be the same as all the others but we may as well see it.

 

What makes you think that the mediator or anybody else cares

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I've got no way to scan it at the moment but its the same as the others. They admit to losing the parcel but deny the claim value based on their contractual terms and that I did not opting for their 'increased compensation'. 

 

Its not so much about caring, but If the mediator is doing their job properly then they should at least acknowledge the situation. My understanding of mediation is that their job is to help the parties find a way to share their perspective and help them find a way to settle by starting from where both parties perspectives lie. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...