Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Intrum chasing my late wife's JDW CAT debt


Biofuel
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Some advice please on how to handle this.

 

My wife passed away on the 7th June 2020

 

was going through her desk I found letters from Intrum about a debt she had accrued with JD Williams Ltd a catalogue shop to the tune of £2850.02.

I know nothing about this and I have never seen anything come from J D Williams Ltd.

 

today I had another letter from Intrum asking me to allow them to place a charging Order on the property.

I have no idea if a default notice has been sent or if a CCJ has been sort.

 

Should I send an Account in Dispute letter to Intrum?

Send a Subject Access Request Letter to J.D Williams Ltd

 

Any advice welcome please

 

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Intrum chasing my late wife's JDW CAT debt

typical tactics for 1st credit now intrum

have you got her credit file?

if not go get it and see if they've sneaked in a backdoor CCJ.?

 

it could just be that they were after her and you signing a voluntary charge without going through a court claim.

 

nasty lot sadly.

dont do anything for the minute regarding them

lets get info 1st then we will attack or simply ignore them

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about your wife. For clarity have you contacted them to say your wife has died or at all? If you haven't it might change the advice. DX and others will know more

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check here first and see if they have judgment against your wife.

 

https://www.trustonline.org.uk/

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What type of joint ownership was the property, were you joint tenants or tenants in common?

Did you wife leave any capital in her estate?

 

Where you were joint tenants, the property passes to you and is not considered to be a part of your wife's estate.

 

Where there is capital or equity in her estate, the executor or administrator of her estate would usually need to settle this debt from any capital left after funeral costs.

 

If your wife did not leave an estate of any value, the debt is unenforceable, unless she also has other debts which amount to at least £5000 which haven't been paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so is this CCJ on her credit file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on 

19 hours ago, Andyorch said:

Check here first and see if they have judgment against your wife.

 

https://www.trustonline.org.uk/

 

Andy

 

follow above.

 

use her name and address E&W costs £3

 

if the home was jointly owned and you are obv not part of a joint A/C with JDW then intrum are flying a kite without an existing CCJ in-place and like all her debts , can mostly be ignored , YOU personally are not responsible for settling them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just checked Trustonline NO CCJ's listed.

 

I remembered checking my Creditkarma report and seeing a mistake on the Financial Associates It states that my wife has a Lloyd's Bank Account (Wrong) she has only had two accounts one with Barclays and one with HSBC.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent...and you have informed them of her death...safe to ignore.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent no christmas bonus for Intrum. Nothing they can really do.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a copy of my Sar's Letter to JDW

 

Subject Access Request.

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

                        I am the husband and executor of the late Mrs *************** of the above address. Mrs ********* pas

(template removed -dx )

Link to post
Share on other sites

what does our sar say in red at the top....

 

i would simply send it, you dont need to list chapter and verse

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As mentioned, you are not personally liable for any consumer credit debt which is in your wife's sole name just because you are her husband. But depending on the value of her estate, as the executor, you are legally obliged to settle outstanding debts owed by her estate where there is capital available to do so. It's not simply a case of 'you are not liable, there is nothing Intrum can do', as the executor you could be held personally liable if you did not fulfill your obligations correctly.

Edited by Will Goodfellow
Link to post
Share on other sites

The day after my wife passed away I started to contact her creditors and explained that as autopsy need to be carried out I could not send them a death certificate.

 

About a week later I heard from the coroner that tissue samples had to be sent to the lab for testing and that she could issue an interim Death Certificate

 

I sent copies of this to all her creditors and explained that there was not any money in her estate. All but Intrum wrote off the debt. 

 

However, there was a small amount of money in her bank accounts. She was in receipt of PIPS and state pension this does need to be paid back and is in a separate bank account waiting to be reclaimed.

 

The state pension went into her bank account the day after she died. Her pip's went in a few weeks before so not sure how much needs to be paid back on that. But they have been notified of her death and payments have been cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore them.....no estate...no pay......debt is unenforceable.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All. Just as a matter of curiosity I sent a SAR's letter to JD Williams/N Brown  requesting details of my late wife's account  and a copy of the Default Notice. I received the reply today but it did not include a copy of the Default Notice. So I emailed N Brown Ltd and this is their response.

 

Good afternoon, 
 
Thank you for your email.
 
We are sorry you are not happy with not receiving a copy of the default notice as requested. In our initial response we mentioned that in instances where we do not hold a copy of the information requested, we cannot provide it. However, we apologise that this point of your request was not addressed directly and therefore was not clear.
 
We have provided a list of letters issued on the account under the correspondence header. The letters included in this list, including the default notice, are system generated and we do not hold a copy of the actual letters. We only store the letter code and date it was issued, and this is what we have provided, along with an explanation as to what each letter is.
 
As we do not hold a copy of the default notice, unfortunately this means we are unable to provide it.
 
Kind regards, 
 
Data Protection and Governance Team
 
So I can not check to see if the Default Notice meets the statutory requirements of the CCA.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

So I can not check to see if the Default Notice meets the statutory requirements of the CCA.

 

 

Why would you want to...not your debt.....irrelevant.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andyorch The debt was sold to Intrum, and they are asking for a voluntary charging order against the house which was in joint names. There is no CCJ for this Debt against her.

The CCA states that before enforcement action can be taken the Debtor must be served a default notice, making the Default Notice a legal document.

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Biofuel said:

they are asking for a voluntary charging order against the house

 

so what..stuff and all they can do unless you want to be a mug and pay for their xmas staff party by giving them free money

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not your debt not enforceable most likely so why would you "Volunteer" to give them a stake in your property?  If you don't volunteer  they can't do diddly.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...