Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EON and Debt Collector 2013/2014


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1375 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

Hi everybody,

 

I have only just stumbled on this forum and have spent days reading through some posts but would appreciate some specific help if you would be so kind.

I will try to be brief.

 

10 years ago I let out a property using a 2 different Letting Agents with their full management services.

 

Tenant 1 at some point switched to EON energy. 

They left Nov 2013. 

Letting Agent 1 would have closed the energy accounts on their exit.

 

The property became empty for less than 2 months.

 

Tenant 2 moved in Feb 2014 through Letting Agent 2. 

Tenant 2 switched the energy over to Scottish Power. 

They left in 2016.


That property is now my main residence and I am no longer a landlord.


I did not know that anything was a-miss until 7th January 2020 when I received a letter from a Debt Collect Company called Azzurro, reading that they had purchased the debt from EON.

 

At first I thought it was a [problem]. 

I called Azzurro who confirmed they had bought the debt for an outstanding bill in my name + c/o Letting Agent(2) for the period Nov'13 to Jan'14.

I then called EON, who told me that they sent 3 bills Dec'13, Jan'14 then May'14.

I received none of these bills.

 

The first 2 bills would have been received by me during the empty property period and acted upon accordingly. 

I received no bill. 

The 3rd bill would have been received by tenant2.

 

I have now managed to get a copy of the last 2 bills and they are both ESTIMATED bills, close to £500 for 48 days whilst the property was empty.

When speaking to EON I asked why the bills were estimated bills. 

They replied that I would have to provide with proof actual readings for the bill to be amended.


Nearly 6 years later I have no paperwork of any meter readings.

 

When Tenant 1 (EON customer) moved out (Nov'13), Letting Agent 1 would have closed the energy accounts.
Then when Tenant 2 moved in (Feb'14), Letting Agent 2 would have created new EON/Scottish Power energy account.

So surely, EON would have actual readings for the empty period Nov'13 - Feb'14 and could produce an Actual bill but they are saying the ownness is on me to provide actual readings.

 

My financial and personal health situation has changed considerably and this is something I could really do without.
My questions (please) :

 

1   Can EON sell the (unbeknown) debt just a week shy of 6 years later ?

2   Still not completely clear about when the 6 years statue begins; Jan'14 (Tenant1 exit) or May'14 (last bill date) ?

3   Does back-billing come into play here anywhere.

4  Any other way I can challenge the Estimated reading bills ?

 

All help would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send the fleecing DCA our statute barred letter from the debt collection section of our library

 

next time don't forget

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and have 

ZERO legal powers on ANY debt.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you for your response.

 

This statute barred does confuse me :-

The billing period was 30/11/13 to 14/01/14.

EON apparently sent out a bill 02/05/14.

They sold the debt to DCA on 02/10/19 but wrote to me 07/01/20.

 

So where does the 6 year statue barred period start from ?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sb actually runs from YOUR last payment or usage, not from when anyone sent you a piece of paper ...no matter what's on it.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, gr8-noose said:

 

ought the debt for an outstanding bill in my name + c/o Letting Agent(2) for the period Nov'13 to Jan'14.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tough luck on Azurro. They buy Stat Barred debts for probably 1p in the pound, knowing that a few % of people will poo their pants, fall for their fake bully boy tactics and pay up.

 

You however, came to CAG and know better. It's SB'd, unenforceable and there is nothing that EON, Azurro, or anybody else can do about it. 

 

One Caveat. Always keep them updated with your current address just in the highly unlikely event they decide to try it on with a claimform.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they will be up the creek if they persist after the SB letter sent, and so try a claimform, as the SB defence would blow it away and they have chucked good money chasing impossibility.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all responses. but before I get too excited :-

 

Last payment

        I never made one, because tenant1 / Letting Agent1 never told me who the energy supplier was.
        I never received any bill in my name to pay.
        The property was empty for 48 days so the usage was minimal.

 

Last usage            17/1/14

 

Azurro's letter       03/01/20


The time between last usage and Azurro's letter is just shy of 6 years.

So is it definiately SB'd ?

Please tell me if I am mis-understanding something.


Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the debt buyer (have you had a notice of assignment?)

would have to issue a letter of claim 1st before they did court giving 30 days for you to reply

then they have to wait a further 30 days 

so 2 mts later will be the earliest they should issue a court claim were they to be so bold!!

 

we've never lost a util debt claim yet.

 

send them the SB letter.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites


Azzurro letter (03/01/20) informing me that they have purchased the debt from EON.  
So this is the letter of assignment ?

 

In this letter they write that they have appointed Moreton Smith company to manage the account.
It does not state any 30 day periods/limits.

When I phone Moreton Smith co, initally to find out if it was a [problem].  They told me that they had the bill in my name that was outstanding and could email it to me.
They would not post it out.  I said that if I was liable I would pay it but you must post me the bill.  Of course then they did post me a copy of the bill.

 

I recall that all their phone calls are recorded.  So have I already shot myself in the foot ?


I will send the SB letter to Moreton Smith.

 

Just need some more reassurance.  Thanks.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

phonecalls are in admissible, stop worrying.

next time never ring or use email ...with these DCA's or their dogs

they'll say anything to sc@m people out of free money that goes straight in their after hours drinks fund at the local pub.

the original 'creditor' never see a penny of it.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites


Ooh heck...

I've just been reading the thread about the claimform. A lot to take in.  Something I cannot do in 5 minutes or even an evening.

My health is not great and I am not sure if I am up to battling in small claims court.

In fact, I really do not even want to be issued any court summons.


I do agree that the 48 days the property was empty, the energy consumed would be my responsibility.
However, I never received any bill for that period or any period.  First time I knew about it was from DCA assignment letter.
EON's bill was made up with estimated Start and End reads so absolutely excessive.

So really, I want to challenge the legality of the claim due to the length of time passed  -  statue barred ?

If it is not SB, then the estimated bill amount itself.


As advised here, I will post the SB letter on Monday.

If Azzurro / Moreton Smith ignore the SB and continue, worst case scenario would I get the option to just pay the excessive outstanding debt without any additional costs ?


Thank you.

Edited by gr8-noose
grammer
Link to post
Share on other sites

eh?

any court claim would be made well after sb date.

 

stop panicking and reading stuff that doesn't apply to your situation.

 

you got a scary letter...so what wise up....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they tried any court claim the SB defence should see them off.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

eon have sold the debt

told you all this and what to do back in post 2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi guys,

 

I am trying to update my last thread from earlier this year.

It appears to be closed.  I have tried messaging the site but apparently do not have enough counts.

Please help me to update this thread as further advise is needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can post here now 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody,

 

I hope you are all well in this quite unbelievable time.

 

I have an update and would appreciate your thoughts.

As advised I sent the SB letter (early Feb'20) to Morton Smith the company who were acting on behalf of Azzurro Associates.

 

In April I got the same demand letter now from Azzurro Associates themselves. 

In response I sent the SB letter to them.

 

I heard nothing back until a week ago. 

Azzuro Associates Ltd who have now changed their letter-head to read Azzurro Law Ltd have sent me a DISCOUNTED SETTLEMENT OFFER.

 

The letter reads :

'Before proceeding with legal action, we are offering the settlement to avoid unnecessary fees and costs being added to the debt.'
'If you are unable to pay the discounted settlement offer, we are willing to work with you to agree an appropriate instalment repayment plan.'

 

My initial thought was to just send them another copy of the SB letter but thought that I would just check with you guys first, in case this new letter means things have legally escalated and that they are able to continuing officially hounding me.

 

All help greatly appreciated.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

means nothing

it's a begging discount letter

changes nothing

once a debt is barred by time, nothing not even a judge can unbar a debt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't give them that feeling of grandeur.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually had printed the previous SB amending the date first.  I then realised that they changed their name from Azzurro Associates Ltd to Azzurro Law Ltd.  So by hand I drew a line through Associates and wrote Law above it.  Just to highlight that I noticed their name change tactic.

So perhaps I will send it this time.

 

If they do continue to send demand letters, say every few months to try and wear me down or something, is there any threatening letter/template I can send to them, for them to get the picture that I will not be bullied/intimidated by their letters and back off !

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...