Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Centrica/CST claimform - Industrial Training Bond


smooth
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1 witness statement in response....check for accuracy and amend if required.

 

In the County Court at Sheffield Claim number XXXXXX.pdf

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, that reads very well and much better than anything I would be able to put together on my own, thank you. 

 

shall I email that over to the court and CC in CST law like they did with me when they sent their witness statement or would this information need to be posted? 
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do both..just make sure you meet the deadline.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll be getting it emailed across today and i'll ring the court in the morning to inform them and check if they would like a paper copy 

 

I just wanted to check a couple of things on the draft statement - 

 

statement 3 - 'overpayment of actual salary only equates to £2,500' should this figure be what they are claiming they overpaid me (£766.13) ? 

 

statement  4.0 - (see exhibitis xxxxxx attached) what should I be filling in the blank with? 

 

statement 4.0 denying paragraph 15 - 'the total value of the claim is £9324.63' < would this figure not be the £9,000 training bond + overpayment of £766.13 ? 

 

another question on page 40 of the document I uploaded from the claimant, there is a page dedicated to the training bond and below it asks for a signature, name and date all of which are blank? as if I never signed nor agreed to it? 

 

as soon as I have clarity on the above I will get it sent and again Andy I just wanted to say thank you I really appreciate you doing this for me 😊😊 

 

 

sorry, it's not letting me edit the above post again.

 

i wanted to add page 35 is the only document where my name is digitally signed and page 41 conveniently has its own page saying i have signed all documents above (even though it's clearly something they have added)

 

surely my name should be next to each individual document reflecting i have agreed / acknowledged like page 35 and what is to say that the page 41 document is only relating to page 35

 

how can they prove its for all of the other documents when my name isn't next to them? 

Edited by smooth
Link to post
Share on other sites

You know the finer details of the claim...anything above with any relevance you can add...but with regards to what they claimed on the claim form it is £9324.63 + Issuance fee + Sol fee......so thats all the court can allow should they win......if the court allows interest and that is only at the courts discretion  then that can also be added, but as you see from the statement/N1 they have not got a clue and added interest twice.

 

I have gone with your admitted amount because that's what you submitted £2500...that cant be changed now, they state they only overpaid £766.13...all in all when you look at the N1 claim form figures and their statement figures what they require.....none of it makes sense.and possibly why the court have allocated it to small claims track because the initial claim is less than 10 K.

 

With regards to contract's and no signatures you can raise that as and when and if its brought up.....but without a signed contract then you are not obliged or liable for any make believe training bond.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi, 

 

I have court next week and I have no idea what to expect or what is expected of me in front of the judge 

 

I will be going over the defence that’s been filed etc but is there anything else I should be doing? Would I be expected to talk / defend myself or simply just answering yes / no 

 

any pointers would be appreciated 

 

thank you 😊 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever is asked, you keep to the statements made in your defence or witness statement.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

generally speaking, would I be expected to say much? If I'm unsure of what is asked would I be able to refer to what I have stated in witness / defence to be accurate? 

 

Also, would the judge's judgment be influenced by how I answer or will he just refer to the paperwork I have sent in? 

 

Should I bring p60's from my job to show I left British Gas and returned straight back to my old employer in an office? 

 

thanks! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judge will certainly be influenced by how you answer - otherwise there may as well not be a hearing!

 

In the past before court hearings I've asked a friend to pretend to be the claimant's/prosecution's representative and to give me a hard time, so I was sure I had my story straight and could answer well.

 

I doubt the P60s are that relevant.  The judge will in interested in whether at any point you agreed to pay British Gas this money.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't take your p60's nor refer to any docs not Inc as an exhibit in your WS.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you both! slightly nervous I won't lie. hopefully, the judge doesn't give me a hard time. I'll try to stick to the facts outlined in the documents I've sent in. 

 

will I be questioned by Centrica's solicitors? i.e. will they try and make me slip up etc :( 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Centrica/CST claimform - Industrial Training Bond

no you wont.

its nothing like you might think it is not like TV!!.

 

also watch out for little chats they might want before you go in...smile and walk away.

 

read your ws a few times, make sure you understand what you have stated.

you most certainly need to ensure if you need too, that you get across that you did not sign all the documents, particularly the training bond stuff, and the claimant has no individually signed training document proving that you did.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What little chats do you mean Dx? And with whom? 
 

So the only signed statement they have is that virtual one, as per the documents I’ve uploaded previous. what is the best approach towards this when questioned on the virtual signature?

 

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They fleecers may try to unnerve you before the case by wanting a private chat.  

 

I don't believe for one minute that's now people signed up to training. There are two threads here whereby it was supposedly placed Infront of them at the 1st session??. But sadly non have comeback to tell us how they got on .just vanished.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah right okay I’ll be cautious then! 
 

I don’t recall signing anything physically though there is a possibility in the Academy when I first started during training they presented documentation to sign I can’t quite recall though.

 

As of yet they have yet to show any proof I physically signed anything relating to the training bond (maybe it’s been lost if I did) and on the above documents uploaded the virtual signature in on a page on its own as though they just placed a separate page underneath the contracts,

 

the actual contract itself isn’t signed but then on another document my mangers handwritten signature is present and my name has been typed. Again, this is different to the part of the document with the training bond and there is no virtual name it’s just blank? I will attach the file to view 

 

would it be worth me highlighting the above facts? And saying I don’t recall signing a contract regarding the training bond and the only signature that can produce is on its own page 
 

Should I have received a trial bundle from the claimant or is the e-bundle they sent a few months back the same thing? 
 

thanks 

 

 

 

combined.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge ruled in their favour as I sighed a valid contract. He didn’t relate to any of my points raised in my witness statement. It felt like the decision was already made due to employment contract law, regardless of what I said or stated in witness statement. Instead of the 8% interest he lowered it to 2% still around £11k odd.


not the result any of us wanted, very disappointing and there’s nothing I can do about it now :( 

 

thanks for everyone’s input in the build up to the case 

 

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge lottery Def 

 

If you've been told to pay the full value by xx date, stick in an n245 tomorrow 

For a small £pcm

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

they offered me to pay £7,000 back before court in full .. kinda wish I just took it now. Sad times :( 

 

gutted by the judge, Centrica’s solicitor said she thinks it would be a female judge before I went in (yes she asked to speak with me prior) she was actually really nice. Turns out it was a male judge who very much agreed with the contract I sighed unfortunately. 
 

I’m going to try and see if Centrica will agree to lower the amount if payment can me made in full though I doubt this is possible now giving the judges decision. 

 

Really don’t want to be stuck paying monthly payments for the next decade! 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

so you can afford to pay it off by 28 days?

if so the CCJ will not be registered. 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, I won't be able to pay the full 11k off :( 

 

I will try and get them to reduce the overall bill to a more reasonable figure and I'll pay in full (I know this is very unlikely now) otherwise, I am going to have to sort monthly payments.

 

is it Best to fill out an N45 or try to come to an agreement directly with Centrica? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the n245 done and into the court. Once that's sorted and ratified you can see if BG will reduce the value. But they have their judgement and have no reason too 

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...