Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Did you ever think of walking away? Become bankrupt and in 12 months it'll all be behind you. My feeling is that you may well get nothing from the sale of the property anyway. Going by the date this thread started it looks like eight years of arrears, lender's costs and receiver’s fees on top.
    • Just to clarify - I make use of evening legal clinics. It is not always possible to see a lawyer (they have limited time and days/week).  This means questions one has may never get answered or there's weeks between follow-ups.   To be really clear - I am representing myself; I am playing at being lawyer/ barrister - which means I take help wherever I can get it (and then research it thoroughly). Ae - a judge in a recent hearing pointed out the receiver is not part of my current proceedings - and suggested I have a separate claim v the receiver. Disclosure has presented damning evidence v the receiver  The receiver against whom I have a complaint is not part of the receiver governing body.   The receivership is in 2 names - a joint one.  My complaint is directed at whom I was told is the lead receiver.  The other named receiver IS a member of the governing body.  But he has now left the company.  And the lead receiver has retired - but is still a working consultant on my case.   All the evidence shows it was the 'lead' receiver who was doing all the  work/ the misbehaviour.   But if the appointment was 'joint' would I make a complaint against them both?    I am sure that wouldn't go down well with the other receiver who is at the beginning of his career. The law is very much against borrowers.   But the evidence against this receivership is crystal clear.   I just don't know how and to whom to complain.   The places I've tried so far don't offer much transparency       
    • Ok, noted, thanks again. I'll share details of every communication received just to make sure.
    • Yes. I sent back the PAP form stating they hadnt supplied the correct paperwork and that pdf is what they sent back
    • have you responded to the letter of claim?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

complaining about UC workcoach


anita8023
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1502 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i was signed on 20th january2020 -16th april 2020 by my gp after my gp also sent for  hospital referral .

 

i handed in my fitnote to my jc and told my workcoach my situation ...then a message came through in my uc journal from my work coach saying i would be getting a medical assessment form through for a medical ..so a few day later the form came i filled it in and sent it back then on 20th february.

 

i had my medical and Failed ..no surprise there ....then i was told by a call from my work coach that from 12th march i was back on jobsearch ...as my failed medical invalidated my fitnote ...i feel like my workcoach pushed my medical app through quick after all i was suppossed to be signed off for three months and not have it binned halfway through ..

 

i was advised by my workcoach to get a fit note in the first place as i have on going  medical problems so what was the point in my GP giving me a fitnote etc if my workcoach had it binned by his hurry to get me off it cos that is what it seems ..

 

my gp not happy with him either ..did have this happen to me after my shoulder surgery my previous workcoach waited until my gp gave me the all clear then i had my medical ... can anyone advise me what to do ..or give me a adress to complain to ..

 

ive been on dwp looking but it says use your UC journal ..which i dont want to do as my workcoach will see it and i want to complain about him not to him ..hes not very nice the best of times 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but your solid block of text is very difficult to read.

Please could you post your story in a well spaced and punctuated format so that it is easy for people to read. People want to help you and support you – but it's difficult to read solid blocks on the screen.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have edited your post to make it easier to read.   

 

What the Work Coach has done, is what DWP would expect of the Work Coach , which is to follow their processes. So any complaint would not be worth the time and effort. 

 

The previous Work Coach may have switched off the work search aspect of the claimant commitment,  but it depends on the situation at the time.  They won't keep switching off the work search requirements, just because of a Doctors fit note.

 

If you want to challenge the health Work Capability decision which found you fit to work, then you need to raise a Mandatory Reconsideration.  

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/challenge-a-decision-made-by-the-department-for-work-and-pensions-dwp

 

In reality, the decision to find you fit for work, just means that you have to search for work and apply for any suitable jobs.  When you apply for any jobs, you would tell any employers that you have a Doctors fit note currently which recommends that you are not fit for work until x date. 

 

Although the Job Centre no longer recognises the fit note,  the fit note is still a valid document to be advised to any potential employers and if they wanted to employ you, you would have a discussion with them about your health, so they could see what work you could do.  

 

So when you discuss your claimant commitment with the Work Coach, you need to discuss what work searching  you are able to perform each week and what type of jobs you will apply for.  If you are not happy with the claimant commitment set by the Work Coach, you can challenge it with the Job Centre duty manager.  If you are not happy with the Work Coach, you can ask for a meeting with the Job Centre duty manager and see if they will change the Work Coach.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your work coach can't state that your fit note is invalid as that's preposterous.

 

They should now tailor your claimant commitment  to reflect what is stated on the note. 

 

How UC works is that a fit note may trigger a WCA (work capability assessment) if the condition lasts for more than 3 months. It's automated so a valid 3+ month fit note will trigger the IT to issue a WCA notification (* see side note below)  But before that a valid fit note triggers a round of Claimant Commitment negotiation of what you are now realistically able to do. 

 

If your work coach is ignoring the fit note then a complaint is in order! 

 

Have a read of this https://claimantcommitments.org.uk on arguing the CC and avoiding sanctions. 

 

CPaG also have pre action judicial review templates on this as well https://cpag.org.uk/welfare-rights/judicial-review/judicial-review-pre-action-letters as they think this issue is rampant and needs legally challenged. 

 

 

* it's a big issue with ESA transfers as when the DWP mess up the transfer on to UC (ESA should carry over with the LCW & LCWRA added from day 1) they often ask for new fit notes which if you are long term disabled will naturally be 3-6 months from your helpful GP. So it auto triggers a new and un necessary round of WCA. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

im on long term sick due to a mc accident three years ago had a shoulder op two years ago but it didnt work so now my gp is referreing me to a diggerent section of hosputal and has signed me off for three months whilst the referral is coming through but my wca assessment didnt take that into account also after my shoulder op i was off for ine moths and still i was sent to two medicals in that time and both medicals failed me and said ibwas fit for work 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...