Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good evening, My husband and I are looking for some help regarding a faulty car which we have recently purchased from Big Motoring World Enfield. The details are as follows: - Make - Nissan Qashqai 2017 1.2L milage 55,349 miles.  Date purchased -   01/06/2024 Price paid - Deposit £9000, finance £4794 (this includes the 3yr Nissan extended warranty), buyers fee £249.      Total including all fees etc = £ 13794.        Initially, during the test drive, there was no problem with the car at all and this is why my husband bought the car on the day. No problems on the way home from the dealership and up to three days after purchase, the car drove smoothly. However, after day 4, occasionally we would feel a slight shudder during some gear changes (automatic car). Over the next few days these shudders worsened and then on day 5 the car would make very a very loud shudder with every single gear change. It was at this point we contacted Big Motoring World for advice as we are still under the 14 days no questions asked return.  My husband contacted BMW for advice on 06/06/2024 and stated the problems as above. He spoke to a sales person who informed him that he should only take the car to a Nissan dealership (we have now been told that this is false information). We were also promised that a courtesy car would be provided for us after the fault on the car had been identified and confirmed by their mechanic fixing the car. We took the car to the garage that Big Motoring World had told us to go. Upon arrival there we discovered it was a third-party garage, not Nissan. We took the car to the garage on day 9. The mechanic ran a diagnostic test which found no faults, but after the test drove the car and below are his findings...   we scan the car but no faults with the gearbox showing but when I test drove the car it was really juddering and jumping.I spoke to my auto transmission specialist and he said they are very common on these as the CVT belt starts jumping within the box due to pressure loss.  We had this vehicle in for diagnostics for gearbox mate but both the gearbox and battery are faulty.Gearbox supplied and fitted comes to £3500 plus vat   Where we are at now…. My husband spent all of day 10 (11/06/2024) making phone calls between the garage, Warranties2000 and Big Motoring World. He tried, unsuccessfully to find out if the diagnostic reports had been shared between all three. Everyone kept saying the report hadn’t been received and yet the garage assured us it had been sent. Eventually we were told that the courtesy car would be given to us if it was deemed the works to fix the car would take longer than 8 working hours, and that decision would be made after 48hours of receiving the report. Today is day 11 and no decision has been made as nobody is telling us any decisions as people are off sick or on holiday! Today we called the garage and told the mechanic NOT to start any work as we will be returning the car. He said none have been started and we have left the car in his storage as he has deemed the car undrivable. I have sent an email to BMW now formally stating that we want to return the car and I have used the terminology that was suggested.   What can we do next?   Thank you everyone. .  
    • Yes will do thanks Dave, I wonder what will happen at the preliminary hearing no idea what they will ask I assumed once I sent the proof they asked for about my sons condition that I would have just  been given the go ahead to be Litigation friend
    • First the judge will rule on you representing your son, which will be a doddle. After that the full hearing date will be fixed, with WSs exchanged 14 days before. So for the moment just concentrate on getting the right to represent your son.  
    • Thank you, the mediations in a couple of days so hopefully they show up this time. I'll update this thread after how it goes
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tesco Bank - CIFAS Placed 2016 - Advice On How To Handle?


L33noa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 933 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm very troubled by this proposed particulars of claim – mainly because it is far too detailed.

I'm always very much in favour of a minimum particulars of claim which give as few hints and cues to the defendant as possible so that there is a greater likelihood that they will disclose interesting information in their defence.

I have to say that I've been thinking about this for some time and I'm finding it difficult to come up with a suitable form of words – but I do think that what you're proposing here is not what is needed and effectively amounts to throwing in everything including the kitchen sink.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am happy to be led by your expertise and judgement on this. I have never been down this road before so your guidance is much appreciated happy to revise it if you think it will be more effective. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very new for us as well. But my instinct is that you should keep this very short and let them respond with detail.

I know that your letter of claim expires tomorrow – but a few extra days won't matter

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest something like this:

 

Quote

The defendant suspected the claimant of fraudulent abuse of his bank account number XXXX. They carried out a flawed investigation without observing proper procedures and in all the circumstances treated the claimant fairly in their manner of their investigation and in their manner of communication with him. The defendants disregarded a recommendation by one of their managers Tom O’Donnell that there was no basis for finding that the claimant was fraudulent. As a result of this unfair treatment the claimant is now the subject of a CIFAS marker. The defendant is fully aware of all of the facts. The defendant has failed to inform the police of alleged fraudulent activity by the claimant so that the claimant has been deprived the opportunity of participating in a fair and open and impartial investigation by outside authorities. The claimant is suffering damage as a result and at the moment claims £200 but the damage is continuing.

 

 

Which sort of says it all – but in fact says very little at all.

Please can you have a look through it and see what you think in principle – and then let me know if there are any features which you think should be included or which should be taken out and if there is anything that is not correct.

 

Please can you doublecheck the name of the person that I have entered in red and correct it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am more than happy with this if you feel its a better approach   the name was Tony O'Donnell which i can amend 

 

                                                               

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. I wanted to give a few more words of caution before you actually did that.

Just so you know that very few BCOBS claims have ever been issued although they have produced successful results before any hearing and under conditions of confidentiality.

However, a claim on the basis that you are bringing yours is very unknown. I would hope that the bank would want to avoid trouble and would simply review what they have done and correct everything.
However, they may well rise up and decide to crush you.

How much did you actually claim for? What figure did you put in as the damages you are looking for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well lets see what happens now I suppose. you would think given the ICO and FOS have and Tesco them selves acknowledged the investigation was flawed that some common sense will prevail. but like you say who knows it may well stir up a hornets nest instead. 

 

claimed for £500 as that was only £35 to do that 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't surprise me if they offer you the £500 plus your costs in order to get you to drop it – but without them taking any further action.

They may well try to contact you in confidence – and if they do then may be you would like to contact me on our admin email address.

Paying the amount of money you want is easy for them and it means nothing. Of course you want something much larger so we'll have to see how it goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well don't get your hopes up too high – but keep on monitoring the money claim site very closely and be prepared to put in for a judgement at the very minute that it allows you.

Thanks for the update

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

on Deadline day and Tesco has responded asking for extra time to respond. 

Tesco Bank has been given an extra 14 days to respond to your claim.

They need to respond to your claim before 4pm on 21 June 2021.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bless!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you given your permission to extend ?

 

See CPR 15.5

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part15#15.5

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all seems automated online no where i can refuse this etc . I certainly haven't given any permission to extend you would thing a corporation the size of them could reply within the specified time wouldn't you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they only used the 14 days or the full 28/33

 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted the claim 17th May giving them until 7th June to respond the message i got when i completed it was as follows

 

Your claim against Tesco Bank was issued on 17 May 2021.

The defendant needs to respond before 7 June 2021.

The defendant can ask for an extra 14 days to respond. If they do you will be notified of the date you need to respond by.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 15.5 is applicable only after the full 28 days...the 14 days they refer to is after acknowledgment of service to submit their defence...not beyond the 28 days. They must have the claimants agreement to extend further and add a further 28 days...56 days max allowed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm l would ask why you was not asked permission. 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So 8 days into the extended 14 and no contact from Tesco , I stupidly thought given they asked to extend I might have received something by now from them. see what the next few days bring. cut off 21st June 4pm  

Link to post
Share on other sites

post hidden upload totally unredacted.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive managed to read it - Do you have enough proof to conclude in evidence that you were NOT responsible for the transfers etc and that your Account was "Hijacked"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was not unexpected. We expected them to deny everything. Do you have the evidence for this. 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...