Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope the Copper room has lots of space for the filing cabinets.    None of this in anyway smells funny at all l mean 68 company's with only some dissolved. 
    • @Man in the middle Thank you so much for the comprehensive information, this is super useful!    I'm just as confused as you, There were some other papers that he mailed back with his plea. I  read them, the officers statement was on there ... from what I can remember, the officer stated that my brother "had changed lane twice without giving proper time or indication" the papers did not mention speeding or anything else...    It doesn't help that the car he was driving (belonging to the mechanic) has a custom exhaust installed ... I'm not sure if this had anything to do with the officer being wound up... My brother said he "had it in for him" ... do you think the judge has seen the video? or is this judgment solely based on the officers statement?    Furthermore, My brother is adamant against a guilty verdict ... do you think that reduced the chance of this case being reopened?    As for the fine, they are already taking money from his universal credit which is effecting his life in a great way  
    • Looking at the sentencing guidelines, the sentence, on the face of it, seems harsh – and a little confusing. From your description the offence seems at the lower end of seriousness. There are three bands of seriousness mentioned in the guidelines. From the least serious, the suggested sentences are:   A fine of half a week’s net income, and 3-4 points A fine of a week’s net income and 5-6 points A fine of a week and a half’s net income and 7-9 points (or a disqualification).   The sentencing guidelines are here:   Careless Driving (drive without due care and attention) (Revised 2017) – Sentencing WWW.SENTENCINGCOUNCIL.ORG.UK     From your description I can see no aggravating factors to push the offence up from the lowest band of seriousness.   The sum he has been ordered to pay is based on the highest fine – a week and a half’s income. Let me explain how I have deduced this. As well as the fine, the court will also order prosecution costs (normally £90) and a “victim surcharge” of 10% of the fine. When the court has no information about a defendant’s income a default figure of £440 per week is used. So, he will have been ordered to pay 1.5 times £440, so £660 by way of a fine, £66 Victim Surcharge and £90 costs. Total £816, as per his notice. The fine indicates that the court viewed the offence in the top band of seriousness.   The confusing thing is the points. If the court considered the offence at the top of the seriousness range, he should have received at least seven points, not six. He has also been sentenced on the basis of a Not Guilty plea (which is again the default when no plea has been entered). This means he did not receive credit for his guilty plea. This is normally a discount of one third off the fine (but not the points).   So much for an explanation of what’s happened. What’s to do? He faces some considerable difficulty here because of the length of time elapsed between his conviction and now. His only option is to ask for a court hearing to have the matter reopened.   He should be aware that the court is not obliged to agree to this and may not do so in view of the time elapsed. When making his request he should do so on the basis that the sentence does not seem to comply with the guidelines on two counts: (1) he should submit that the offence is at the lowest end of seriousness and (2) the sentence is inconsistent with the guidelines anyway (discrepancy between points and fine).   He also needs to contact the fines office as a matter of urgency. I am surprised he has not already faced one of the sanctions they mention by now but he needs to let them know he is asking for his case to be reopened. Once again, in view of the time elapsed, they may continue with their normal enforcement process anyway.    If he had dealt with this promptly it is my view (provided the court sees the offence at the lowest end of seriousness) he should have face a fine of half a week’s net income, reduced by a third for his guilty plea, a 10% victim surcharge (minimum £34), £90 costs and three points. That is the ideal outcome he should be looking for but, as I said, the court may not agree to reopen the matter at all. If they do, he may find his full discount for a guilty plea is reduced due to his tardiness. Do let us know how it goes.
    • Agree with Trevor Kavanagh, that the UK cannot afford a Government that is totally split and unable to take the decisive action required.   Government should act on energy price rises by directly providing additional money to help reduce bills.  The £400 announced so far would not be enough.   Reduce the VAT on domestic energy to 0%.   Universal Credit and other benefits need to be increased back to the level provided during Covid as a minimum.   Fuel duties should be cut.   Offer incentives to use public transport by paying subsidies to bus and rail operators that they need to pass on, to reduce fares.    Urgent action required,  Cannot wait until September for emergency budget.    
    • You wanted Boris out and not to interfere in government until he left   Again, I wanted him to go immediately.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Tesco Bank - CIFAS Placed 2016 - Advice On How To Handle?


L33noa
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 259 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please can anyone help me with a CIFAS complaint, i cant work out how to post my question?

 

I filed a compliant with Tesco Bank in April 2018 as I found out I had a CIFAS marker placed against me dating back to October 2016.

 

Tesco delivered a final response and referred me to the Ombudsman,

I subsequently complained to the Ombudsman who in January 2020 some 22 months later delivered a final verdict to uphold Tesco banks decision to place a CIFAS marker.

 

Whilst they upheld the decision they made it very clear that Tesco bank did not carry out a fair and clear process and did not meet the strict criteria to satisfy the recording of  information against me with CIFAS.  

 

The ombudsman also went on to say that Tesco bank did not conduct a sufficient investigation.

However as they could not establish how the transfer would have been made so they have upheld Tesco decision.

 

I want to know what my next steps are.

I have not been involved in any fraudulent activity of any kind , I never used this account since it opened in 2015 due to security concerns and online access problems which I raised.

 

The first time it was used was when deposits and withdrawals were made on my account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so who made these transactions and how did they gain access?

did you send Tesco's and sar before you started all these complaints?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I requested SAR from Tesco who originally refused my request.

 

I complained further and they sent me the SAR and a cheque for £250 as an apology.

unfortunately they didn't provide me anything to do with the transfers as they said they it would be tipping off.

I sent all of this information to the Ombudsman as well.

 

I have not been able to establish who made the transactions.

only that Tesco Bank was notified by the sending bank there had been unauthorized payment from one of their customers account into mine.  which was subsequently transferred out again, an amount of £150 came in and two payments out of £125 & £25 this happened on two days running.

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh? what are they playing at...it obv wasn't you doing it else they'd have sent the data!!

 

was this an adjudicator at the FOS or the Ombudsman man himself…?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was an adjudicator,

I complained and apparently it was reviewed by someone else who didnt contact me, I just had another email saying he agress with original decision. he stated that ...

 

Tesco Bank ought to have done more to ascertain the true position before placing the CIFAS marker and specifically it should have contacted me in the first instance to get my side of the story.

 

he goes on to say ...however i think it is most unlikely that someone would have been able to commit these transfers without my knowledge and cooperation and I am more involved that i am prepared to say 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and are you?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Never.

I opened the account in 2015.

Had nothing but issues getting online with the account. So decided not to use it.

 

It wasn’t until 2018 when my RBS account got closed and I investigated I found out anything about this. 


it’s caused me so many issues and stress.

Can’t get a bank account.

Job turned down

. Insurances cancelled

. And no end in sight :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well someone got into it

wasnt a virus hack going on on your pc at the time was there.. Key logger or an infection??

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a diff one.

if the only laptop used was not a secure single use machine used only by you...

anyone could have used it 

found out the details of the account (could that be why you could never access it?)

then transferred money over

then withdrawn it.

then reported to their bank the unlawful transfer..

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have never specified it was the laptop which accessed, said it was via an iphone again not specified it was mine. provided an IP address which goes to a address different to me. 

 

the fact that they have not carried out a full investigation and the full and proper process for placing the marker should make it wrong and be removed anyway shouldnt it regardless of anything else? the rest it heresy and speculation as opposed to following a process and procedure which they didnt?

Edited by L33noa
didnt mean to submit
Link to post
Share on other sites

ah so you know more info than we currently know...re the iPhone etc?

 

I think a new sar as it's free is in order here.

lets cross i's and dot t's ..then we canr have a firm hold upon what arrows to fire in a complaint.

 

we have a cifas expert here but it will be better to get every shred of info first before their help IMHO.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thats great I will request a further SAR , I will also request a SAR from Ombudsman

are Tesco Bank required to issue another SAR if they have already issued one?  again the first one didnt provide anything around IP address etc that came from Ombudsman so clearly they didnt provide everything

 

I also note that the week after the on goings within my account there was a major  security breech at Tesco : as below: which doesn't fill me with great confidence around what has happened to me:

 

Over the course of the weekend (5 – 6 November 2016) it was reported that approximately 20,000 customers of Tesco Bank (the banking arm of the supermarket giant) saw their money vanish from their current accounts.

 

A further 20,000 customers reported instances of suspicious activity.

The total amount stolen has not yet been revealed but some customers have cited losses of up to £2,400 each.

 

To date, Tesco Bank has confirmed that it has refunded around 9,000 customers up to £2.5m following the breach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can't not be connected.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok Tesco have replied to say the original SAR issued is the full and final one that they hold with all the data. they apologized the original one didn't have telephone calls and have compensated me £50 for this, these will arrive in 30 days.

 

So what am i looking for in the SAR now? what do i need to do next?

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi L33noa - DX asked me to pop by - I will digest your thread in full and advise next steps during the weekend if possible? Unfortunately I work full time so have to balance helping people with helping people in my job ^_^

As for your CIFAS dilemma - Can I ask quickly. Have you access to your own bank account at this time? 

 

CIFAS is complicated and is a very grey area but I will see what I can do to help.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@fkofilee Many thanks for the reply and thank you so much for assisting.

Completely appreciate you have a full time job and of course that comes first so no rush at all.

 

The bank this happened to was Tesco bank (opened Feb 2015),

I never used he account as I had constant problems with accessing it right from day 1.

decided to stick with my main bank (RBS).

 

The account was left open and I didn’t know anything about Tesco placing the CIFAS (in Oct 2016) until RBS unexpectedly closed all my accounts in Jan 2019 leaving me with no banking facilities and unable to get a high street bank or basic bank.

I am now using an internet bank as that’s all I am able to get.

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Call - They are full fledged bank with full permission to trade and covered by FSCS :)

Ill be back this weekend to finish off this and create a plan of action.

  • Like 1

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • fkofilee changed the title to Tesco Bank - CIFAS Placed 2016 - Advice On How To Handle?

So something for you to digest and respond too... 

 

i have the below as your case notes;  Plus some of my own.

 

Quote

Tesco Bank Complaint 

April 2018 Filed


CIFAS Placed in 2016 (October) (3 and a bit years) 

 

Upheld in Tesco's favour but didnt meet strict criteria to place CIFAS Marker. 
KYC Checks / Anti Money Laundering Laws. 

 

Tesco didnt conduct a sufficient enough investigation - **REQUIREMENTS ARE THAT PROOF IF THIS WAS TAKEN TO THE LEGAL SYSTEM TESCO COULD PROSECUTE?!** 

 

How was transfer made?

 

Normally setting up a new payee can involve
- Call to Account Holder - Code 
- SMS to Account Holder - Code
- Requirement to Contact Phone Banking
- Biometrics (Face Unlock / Fingerprint) 

 

Person reported online issues / security conerns. NOV 16!
Tesco had a security breach sometime in 2016 and users lost money which may or may not have been recovered. 

 

Tesco DSAR refused (This would be due to tipping off which is against Anti Money Laundering Regs) 

 

£150 involved

Gone to Adjudicator @ FOS (Ombudsman?)

 

Possible issue with Compromised devices? 

 

Could this be a situation where the account was compromised by a Tech Support [problem]? **Possibly Not**

 

IPhone - Via Banking App or Web Interface (Mobile) 

 

Repeated DSARs incur cost. (Possible they will charge this time around)

 

How do we combat this? 

 

We need to prove that you are innocent. 

 

First off - We need to raise a further request to Tesco to verify how this transfer was made. What information was there. What number's existed on the account? Can Tesco check the information held on their system? App info on a device wont just be IP Address - A lot more sensitive information is supplied to Tesco about the UAD (User Agent Device) 

It is possible that in the weeks up to the Security Incident that some accounts were compromised to test the sensitivity of Tescos AML Systems etc? I believe so...

 

Also - If a new payee was setup - What verification methods were used to approve the setup of a new payee? 


This may need to go legal to get Tesco to back down. The reason for CIFAS is legislation. Its easily challenged in court  if Tesco have confirmed they didnt do a good enough investigation. Either that or Media might be interested in this case. 

 

However we need 100% certainty that you had no involvement in the APPF (Authorised Push Payment Fraud) - If that truly is the case then this may be a slog but hopefully we can get this sorted. 

 

Have you formally accepted and Ombudsman response in relation to the case? (Not an adjudicator)...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note Principal 4 On CIFAS 

 

Principle 4: Lawfulness (Standard of Proof)

Cases filed to the National Fraud Database must be supported by evidence and meet the ‘four pillars’ of the Standard of Proof. The Standard of Proof is:

  1. That there are reasonable grounds to believe that a Fraud or Financial Crime has been committed or attempted;
  2. That the evidence must be clear, relevant and rigorous such that the member could confidently report the conduct of the Subject to the police;
  3. The conduct of the Subject must meet the criteria of one of the Case Types;
  4. In order to file the member must have rejected, withdrawn or terminated a Product on the basis of Fraud unless the member has an obligation to provide the Product or the Subject has already received the full benefit of the Product.

Its off my opinion that Tesco do not hold the required standard of proof to place CIFAS at this time. 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...