Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
    • Received a final demand today Final demand.pdf
    • Here is my final draft: I, XXXXXX, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim and further to my set aside application dated 1 November 2022. The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts in person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act.   1.        The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2 February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None of these documents were received by the court nor the defendant by that date.   2.        I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimants witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment.   As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights.  This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).  The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   3.        The alleged letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address.  I have attached a copy of my tenancy agreement which is marked ‘Appendix 1’ and shows I was residing at a difference address as of 11 December 2018 and was therefore not at the service address at the time the proceedings were served.  I have also attached an email from my solicitors to the Claimants solicitors dated 14 July 2022 which was sent to them requesting that they disclose the trace of evidence they utilised prior to issuing the proceedings against me.  This is marked ‘Appendix 2’.  The claimants solicitors did not provide me with these documents.   4.        Under The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims 2017 a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior to and including ,The Pre action Protocol letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claim form dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018.   5.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020.   6.        Upon the discovery of the Judgement debt, I made immediate contact with the Court and the Claimant Solicitors, putting them on notice that I was making investigations in relation to the Judgement debt as it was not familiar to me.  I asked them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.   The correspondence to the Claimant Solicotors is attached and marked ‘Appendix 3’   7.        I then sent a Data Subject Access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided. Details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 4’and the copies of correspondence between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 5’.   8.        The claimant relies upon and exhibits a reconstituted version of the alleged agreement.   It is again denied that I have ever entered into an agreement with Barclaycard on or around 2000.  It is admitted that I did hold other credit agreements with other creditors and as such should this be a debt that was assigned to Barclaycard from another brand therefore the reconstituted agreement disclosed is invalid being pre April 2007 and not legally enforceable pursuant to HH Judge Waksman in Carey v HSBC 2009 EWHC3417.  Details of this are attached and marked ‘Appendix 6’.   The original credit agreement must be provided along with any reconstituted version on a modified credit agreement and must contain the names and address of debtor and creditor, agreement number and cancelation clause.   9.        Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose a true executed legible agreement on which its claim relies upon and not try to mislead the court.   10.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a true executed copy of the original assigned agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. Signed                 ………………………………………………….. Name                  XXXX Date                     30 April 2024
    • Only trying to help.  Ain't being nasty.  Some
    • Hi folks, I've just found previous documentation. I thought it had gone missing. I'd forgotten that I did appeal it through POPLA but I can't find the thread on here that, I assume, I posted for help. Appeal letter is dated 27/10/2020 with a rejection. I genuinely had forgotten about this so apologies for misleading you. A lot has happened in the years since the ticket was issued. We closed down a couple of businesses and moved to the opposite end of the country to retire. The documents I have are scanned copies. I no longer have the originals. The NTK is also in there. If there's anything you'd like to see, please let me know and I'll post them, although it probably won't be until tomorrow now, but I'll be looking in on this page tonight. Thank you for the responses so far
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ex employer requesting overpay of salary + holidays ***Claim Discontinued***


notodebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1577 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

Just looking for some advice on proceeding forward with a CC claim from an ex employer.

 

Got claim form today and dated 27th Sep so have completed AOS today.

the POC is as follows :

 

The defendant was employed by the claimant as a ************  under a contract of employment commencing on July 2008 which is subject to English law .

The defendants employment with the claimant ended on Feb 2014.

 

The defendant received an over payment of salary from the claimant amounting to £396.55.

This over payment was due to the defendant exceeding his annual leave entitlement by 16 hours and the defendant was paid for 25 ? 28 Feb 2014 after having left his employment on 24 Feb 2018.

 

The claimant has called upon the defendant to make payment of the sum owed,

however the defendant has refused or delayed to make payment and accordingly this action has been rendered necessary.

 

the claimant claims int under section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 1/4/2014 to 26/9/2019 on £396.55 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.09 

 

……………………….

 

Just to give a brief overview of what happened!

 

Jan 2014 I was under disciplinary action for gross misconduct which was never founded and dropped ,

after one interview with HR and my line manager I was sent home on suspended leave fully paid during investigation.

 

After debate/investigation between the comp and my union rep during Feb , my rep told me the company was dropping all action.

I then handed in my notice and told them to shove the job and left on the 24th Feb to which I was paid my last monthly payment and any owed holidays etc.

 

I have received about three letters during the course of the period 2014 to 2019 asking for the payment to which I have replied asking them to break down how i owe this amount.

 

My argument being that I was not on annual leave but suspended leave full pay.

The fault lies with their accounts dept in not calculating the correct pay or communicating the fact I was on suspended leave.

 

Communication and miscommunication was and probably still is a key factor with this company and one of the reasons I handed in my notice on top of the constant issues with my two colleagues which I raised every year during appraisals but nothing was every done about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ever receive any correspondence stating that you were suspended on full pay? If so, you will need this to defend your case in court.

If you can't remember, or have mislaid any documents you can send a Subject Access Request (SAR) to your ex employer detailing all documents required. They have 30 days to respond, at no cost to yourself.

 

In the meantime, you will have to respond to the court documents appropriately, as to how you wish to defend the case, wholly or partially but you must respond. Otherwise your ex employer can win by default.

 

You could have a chat with ACAS and there are some free solicitors near University campuses who maybe willing to help and guide you on the employment law side of things.

If your near to an Employment Tribunal building, it might be worth popping in to them as they have posters up with contact details of qualififed people who may be able to assist. I know its not E.T matter but I'm thinking of free legal advice which specialises in Employment Law.

 

 

 

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shelly..Thanks for the advice.

SAR already typed up.

 

No documentation at all , it was all done verbally over the phone.

I need to see a copy of my contract as well to see if there was a clause about deductions.

 

A number of staff have now left the company including the union rep.

The company were recently in the news so poor are they but Gov backed so they can spend taxpayer money at will.

 

I suspect they may not be able to produce documentation ,

I was accused of taking equipment from the company despite the fact there was no asset register and equipment was handed out to employees with no audit trail,

 

I was one of three people responsible for the equipment and raised concerns many times about items going missing which of course fell on deaf ears. 

 

Oh I should mention the company head office is in Scotland ,

it is this dept that has initiated the CC ,

I was based in the English office at the time.

Not sure if this affects anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you start off by sending an SAR to your ex-employer and also one to the union.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems very unlikely that there aren't at the very least file notes relating to your suspension. Let's deal with that when you get the results of the SAR

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly dont know if the Scotland/England jurisdiction affects this, maybe Andyorch the legal expert on here may know.

Perhaps Bankfodder could point him in this direction?

 

You need to clarify the dates on the court paperwork and see when they need a response by, and think how you want to respond to it, otherwise your ex employers could win by default.

 

I would expect it to be a minimum standard to specify deductions being made via your payroll, usual example would be over-taken on holiday entitlement. But as you explain, you were suspended, not on annual leave.

 

If you still have your payslips/P45 information you could liaise with HMRC to clarify what income tax/national insurance contributions was paid in respect to your employment.

You can also calculate your holiday entitlement on the Gov website.

 

Start making a list of things you want to clarify, questions you need to ask/get answered to keep a methodical record of events for the court hearing, then when you have the Sar information come back if you need any further guidance.

 

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

English court is correct as the defendant doesn't reside in scotland

 

I would be sending them a CPR 31:14 

you have to ack the claim by day 19 

has this claimpack come from northants bulk or Salford court?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the advice to date. It is Northants bulk county court. CRP 31.14 would be ideal especially as the POC states contract in the first paragraph.

 

In terms of questions or clarification certainly what the company has on record for Jan/Feb 2014 in terms of my suspension.

 

Before I handed in my notice I handed a list of issues that I had with the company to my union rep to be raised with HR and my team leader including issues with my two colleagues , security of assets, issues reported to senior managers that were never acted on.

 

After that list all allegations were dropped as I was prepared to escalate further to a tribunal.

 

The company did not want the bad publicity. I think I may have some of those docs on a USB drive

 

It was a shambles any issues were dealt with in a flippant manner , nothing in writing. get on and sort it out amongst yourselves was the attitude.

 

Missuse of company expenses etc was the norm so they wanted to avoid the press getting any negative stories.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
.

 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
..

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/
.
.
type your name ONLY

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

When you send your SAR they have 30 Calendar days (from acknowledging receipt of your request). simply ask for 'ALL DATA' (this covers whatever formats they hold that Data)

 

They could play games due to the claim form and wait to send it at the very last minute so you get it just within the above limit.

 

If they do not comply with your SAR you report them to the Information Commissioner (ICO)

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

You take 30 from day it was signed for by the recipient. 

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

a letter back from company to acknowledge SAR.

Followed by , we authenticate the ex employee by using info provided as part of your request.

The details you provided are not suffice in allowing us to match the records the we currently hold for you, you have failed authentication. and request has been put on hold.

Can you provide the following:

1.Employee No

2. Nat Ins no

3.First line of address and post code

 

When authenticated we will progress your request.

Then goes on to say they have one month to respond as per legislation.If you are not satisfied complain to the ICO...etc

 

Now why do I need to provide these details as they already have them or should do! 

The POC clearly states as an employee so they  should have the details on record.

 

I can provide all details apart from the employee no , as this was five and half years back I do not have that to hand , certainly do not have any payslips etc.

 

I am tempted to write back to say you have not complied with my request in the first instance but do I need to provide these details by law?

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you moved too since having this job?

 

it cant harm you to provide what info you have to help them.

though ofcourse referencing the claim number should really be all that's needed..

 

but that is ofcourse what the cpr was for.

in a way the sar is belt and braces.

 

they must at some point, be it in reply to your 31:14 or latterly at the disclosure stage, produce all paperwork they intend to rely upon in their claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

have you moved too since having this job?

 

it cant harm you to provide what info you have to help them.

though ofcourse referencing the claim number should really be all that's needed..

 

but that is ofcourse what the cpr was for.

in a way the sar is belt and braces.

 

they must at some point, be it in reply to your 31:14 or latterly at the disclosure stage, produce all paperwork they intend to rely upon in their claim

Hi..yes left there in 2014 had several jobs since. I have no idea what the employee number is , so without this will fall at the first hurdle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read what i said CAREFULLY

 

Moved home.??

You dont need employment no 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

neither

 

its immaterial ...you don't have it 

give everything else.

 

or read my post carefully

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you never use email nor give one.

 

else you'll find they'll file important docs 1 min before a deadline removing your chance to retort on them.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...