Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
    • Richard Holden refusing ro answer Jon Craig's questions in a Sky pool interview and his spad argiung about the questions. As Jon said, not his finest hour.  
    • CCA to debt purchaser pap reply to sols with copy of CCA letter included  all as per post 2 in letter of claim thread 
    • If I go to court to defend my claim and will will my licence be unrevoked automatically?
    • Does this mean my driving licence is void now? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Going to Court to obtain my data!??


craigten
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1661 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

And now from the horses mouth: –

 

How long we’ll keep your information

 

We keep information in line with our data retention policy. For example, if you’re a customer, we’ll normally keep core banking data for seven years from the end of our relationship. We retain information to comply with legal or regulatory requirements or for our legitimate purposes, such as responding to enquiries, and may sometimes need to keep it for a longer period; if we don’t need to retain it for as long, we may delete, destroy or anonymise it sooner. This enables us to comply with legal and regulatory requirements or use it where we need to for our legitimate purposes such as dealing with any enquiries.

 

More details about your information

 

If you’d like further information on anything we’ve said in this privacy notice, or to contact our Data Protection Officer, contact us at P.O. Box 6201, Coventry CV3 9HW, UK addressed ‘for the attention of the DPO’.

 

https://www.hsbc.com/privacy-notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

2 hours ago, BankFodder said:

 

Is this the address you wrote to with your last data request?

FAO DPO, P.O. Box 6201, Coventry CV3 9HW

 

 

Just checked and seen I sent it to;

HSBC Bank Plc
8 Canada Square,
London,
E14 5HQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, another request to Canada Square but sent a separate one to Coventry.

Compare the results. If Canada Square are telling porkies then that will give you extra leverage.

I suggest that you post up the letter which you are proposing to send here before you send it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also please can you post up the refusal letter you had from them - in scanned pdf format

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent! Should I do this now, in response to them not providing all the data to my DSAR, or wait until they fail to provide it to my next DSAR?

On ‎14‎/‎04‎/‎2019 at 08:53, BankFodder said:

Right, another request to Canada Square but sent a separate one to Coventry.

Compare the results. If Canada Square are telling porkies then that will give you extra leverage.

I suggest that you post up the letter which you are proposing to send here before you send it

 

Brilliant, and I will!! Give me a few hours!!

 

On ‎14‎/‎04‎/‎2019 at 08:38, BankFodder said:

And now from the horses mouth: –

 

 

 

https://www.hsbc.com/privacy-notice

Forgive me for stating the seemingly obvious but doesn't this directly contradict all the letters I've received where they quote their favourite 'We only keep it for six years' claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, craigten said:

Excellent! Should I do this now, in response to them not providing all the data to my DSAR, or wait until they fail to provide it to my next DSAR?

 

Wait

 

1 minute ago, craigten said:

Forgive me for stating the seemingly obvious but doesn't this directly contradict all the letters I've received where they quote their favourite 'We only keep it for six years' claim?

 

Yes - I think that you must be the only person who is surprised

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just find it difficult to believe* how a huge organisation such as this would make such a glaring error that could / would / will bit them in the behind. 

 

*But obviously I'm chuffed about it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you think that it is an error?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is certainly the kind of evidence you are looking for - but best of all, get the disclosure and then attack them on the lie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it worth getting the ICO on live chat (so evidenced) on this to get their opinion the the fact that HSBC are refusing to give beyond their 6 years 'limit' and yet their privacy notice says 'normally keep core banking data for seven years from the end of our relationship'?

 

Quick one - just out of curiosity, I needed to speak to HSBC tonight so I asked them what address I should use to write to regarding a DSAR and they gave the one in Coventry (Harry Weston Rd, Coventry, CV3 2TR)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Taking HSBC to Court to obtain my data!??

I cannot post the refusal letter until I’m back home in ten days.

 

in the meantime. I wonder if this is of any help to anyone if / when HSBC claim that they don’t keep records on microfilm;

The HSBC Debit Card Cardholder’s Agreement

https://www.hsbc.com.sg/1/PA_ES_Content_Mgmt//content/singapore/hsbcjade/displays/pdf/jade-debit-card-tnc.pdf

 

Specifically, page 9;

General
16.1
Our records (including computer and microfilm stored records) of all matters relating to you are conclusive evidence of such matters and is binding against you for all purposes, save for manifest error, but subject to our right to rectify any error or omission therein and our right to adduce other evidence. We may, in our discretion, destroy any documents relating to any Card Transaction after microfilming or otherwise recording the same in such manner as we may deem fit as well as to destroy such microfilm and records at any time.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi  craigten

 

So where are you at with this now ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

Just back from a two week holiday and planning on getting stuck in on the weekend.

You’ll see I’ve been advised to gather evidence (Bankfodder has been brill)....I’m not 100% sure on how to push on with this?

Also, shall I send a DSAR to Coventry and again to Canada Square?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Evening all,

Due to some family issues and other things going on, I've finally got a bit of spare time to be able to attack this again.

Please can I just check with you that the below is sufficient to send to the Coventry address (the aim, I believe, is to get the 'real' data that includes details of the PPI I had back in the late 90s, as opposed to the data I received when I sent a DSAR to the Canada Square)?

 

Harry Weston Rd,

Coventry

CV3 2SH


25th May 2019 
Dear Sir/Madam


GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATIONS - SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST
 

 [removed - dx]

 

However, to confirm - this goes to the Coventry address and another to Canada Square?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: DSAR sent on Monday to the Coventry addreess via recorded delivery.

 

Once I receive the data back, I'll post on here.

 

In the meantime, are there any other ways to get the data that is stored on microfiche from these scoundrels?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Update on this;

a good while ago I made a complaint to HSBC that their consistent claim to me that they were following Data protection laws by destroying data after 6 years was, in effect, rubbish as (thanks to Bankfodder, I think?) I learned on here that there is no such law / guideline.

I also complained that they were giving me details of my loans from (way) over 6 years ago but weren’t providing me the data / records to go with them and I asked for the certificate of destruction (there might be more than that but until I get home, this is from memory).

 

Today I received a letter apologising, saying I was right about the 6 year thing, they’ve looked and can’t find any physical records (no mention of microfiche) and that they were unable to provide me with a certificate of destruction do being as they can’t account for my data, they’ve offered me £500!?!?

 

Odd?

 

Here it is, thought please?

HSBC 2.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

A good while ago I made a complaint to HSBC that their consistent claim to me that they were following Data protection laws by destroying data after 6 years (The usual quote you must all have experienced of 'We hold paperwork for the last six years in accordance with The Data Protection Act') was, in effect, rubbish as (thanks to Bankfodder, I think?) I learned on here that there is no such law / guideline.

 

Part of my letter of complaint is as follows '

You claim that you no longer have the data I require because you are required by the data protection act to destroy it after six years.
You should understand that I'm fully aware that the data protection act contains no such provision – but if you insist that it does then please let me know the particular section of the Data Protection Act which contains the obligation.

Accordingly I reject your position that you do not have the data and I believe that you are withholding the data from me because you feel that it would be disadvantageous to you to provide it to me. It maybe that the data is within some archive service and of which you are fully aware.

If it is your position that the data has been destroyed then please will you provide a certificate of destruction from your data controller.'

 

Yesterday, I received a letter apologising, saying I was right about the 6 year thing, they’ve looked and can’t find any physical records (no mention of microfiche) and that they were unable to provide me with a certificate of destruction and being as they can’t account for my data, they’ve offered me £500!?!?

 

Also, you will see from the second attachment that they then go on to say that they feel that being as I'm complaining about something that happened more than six years ago and that I'm complaining more than three years after I realised (or should have realised) that there was a problem, that the Ombudsman may agree with them that it's outside the time limits and that they (HSBC) wouldn't give them permission to consider my complaint.

I am struggling to understand why they are pushing me to accept the £500....!

 

I have attached the letter to this post...

 

I have two questions:

1. They phrase offering me the £500 for the reasons of 'To make up for the inconvenience caused and in recognition of your banking relationship'.....this doesn't really ring true so what is the £500 really for? Is it so that I don't report them to the ICO for claiming the six year 'rule', because, to me, this doesn't seem worthy of £500?

2. If they have offered £500 to me for the reason above, what is to stop all you people who have been given the six year rule rubbish line claiming (asking) for £500 too?

3. Do you people, who know better than me, think £500 is enough?

 

 

Hope this helps anyone!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please would you combine the pages into a single pdf file to make it easier to deal with.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

To understand whether this is a good offer or not, it will be helpful if you explain to us why you are looking for the data.

Also, you have said that you have asked them several times – but when was the first time. When was the first time that they spun you the six-year story.

As a general comment, they are saying that the thing you are complaining about could be outside the FOS time limits – but the real complaint here as far as I can see is misleading you and in that respect they are in breach of GDPR and that has happened very recently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this, this is great help.

 

In answer to your question, yes, I sent a SAR to their Canada Square address about two months ago, I will upload the relevant details what came back later.

 

However, last week I sent a fresh SAR to their Coventry address but I used this address:

HSBC

Harry Weston Rd,

Coventry

CV3 2SH

 

However, I have just seen that you have helped me in another thread with, apparently, the correct address of:

FAO DPO,

P.O. Box 6201,

Coventry

CV3 9HW

So I will send another DSAR to this address today!

 

 

Edited by craigten
Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't told us why you want the data

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...