Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
    • Read how your orgnisation can make opportunities and employment more accessible for disadvantaged young people.View the full article
    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
    • Richard Holden refusing ro answer Jon Craig's questions in a Sky pool interview and his spad argiung about the questions. As Jon said, not his finest hour.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/? claimform - old Tesco Credit Card - poss SBd


Anniebella
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What do I do?

Received Court claim form for a very old debt for Tecso credit card

I have sent the acknowledgment of service that I intend to defend......Now I'm not sure what is best to do and time is running out

I am sure this is more than 6 years old. I have checked my credit file and there is no mention of a default notice

 

Can someone help with the next step??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to legal forum & retitled

 

go ring tescos and ask last payment date

unless this was a VERY old one RBS issued one

then go ring them and ask

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Hoist Finance UK Holdings 2

 

Date of issue 18/12/2018

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.This claim is for the sum of £9800 in respect of monies owing under an agreement with the account no.XXXXX pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974(CCA)

 

2.The debt was legally assigned by Hoist Portfolio Holding Ltd (Ex Tesco Finance) to the claimant and notice has been served.

 

3.The defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement.

A default notice has been served upon the defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA

 

4.The claimant claims

1 The sum of £9800

2 Costs

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Maybe/unsure as never open post

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?

 

What is the total value of the claim? £9800

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Before

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Account assigned ??

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Maybe/unsure as never open post

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Maybe/unsure as never open post Though not showing on credit file

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Maybe/unsure as never open post

Why did you cease payments? Major debt problems

 

What was the date of your last payment? I think 2012

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No I dont think so

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? No

Edited by dx100uk
format
Link to post
Share on other sites

really helpful some of those answers.....not!

 

go ring Tesco bank now

ask last payment date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although Tescos say last payment was made in May 2013 no payment has gone out of my bank account

I have searched back as far as online records show (2011) and I had made no payment to them at all

 

How can this be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

only one bank account it was paid from?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

was going to suggest you'd probably blindly paid a powerless DCA I bet.

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday we sent off our requests for CCA and CPR

 

We now have 48 hours to file a defence

I have read through various other threads and I am now completely confused

 

Could someone help in writing a defence or is there a suitable template?

Link to post
Share on other sites

100's of like threads here

Use the search CAG box of the top red toolbar

 

Claim form card

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have searched through many threads and I feel this is the most suitable

 

Being a complete novice and having never done a defence before....Is this all I need to put?

 

I assume I can do this on MCOL and not send in physical papers?

 

Thank You in advance

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.This claim is for the sum of £9800 in respect of monies owing under an agreement with the account no.XXXXX pursuant to the consumer creditlink3.gif act 1974(CCA)

 

2.The debt was legally assigned by Hoist Portfolio Holding Ltd (Ex Tesco Finance) to the claimant and notice has been served.

 

3.The defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement.

 

4.A default notice has been served upon the defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA

 

5.The claimant claims

1 The sum of £9800

2 Costs

 

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with Tesco Personal Finance PLC .I do not recollect the account number or alleged debt the claimant refers to having failed to adequately particularise its claim.I have therefore sought verification from the claimant by way of a section 78 request.

 

3.Paragraph 2 is denied I am unaware of what account the claimant refers to.

 

4.Paragraph 3 is denied I am unaware of what account the claimant refers to. I do not recall receiving any Notice of Assignment which the claimant fails to date or inform or ever having being approached pre litigation with regards this alleged debt.

 

5.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show and evidence any breach and service of a default notice/termination notice:

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

6. On receipt of this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 78 for copies of any documents and the agreement referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. To date they have failed to comply to my section 78 request and remain in default of my request.

 

 

7. As per Civil Procedure icon Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit icon Act 1974.

 

9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your 2 & 3 requires attention...does not correspond to the claimants particulars....and you have not made a response to their 3 & 4?

 

Also the claim value....are there no court/ solicitor fees to take this over 10K ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

 

Ok I kind of understand a little more

I figured that my approach was to deny/dismiss everything and let them prove otherwise

 

£9800 includes their fees/costs

 

I will carry on searching for more suitable threads

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need a some help

I have been reading threads for hours and hours and now starting to panic as I'm running out of time and I cant find or workout a suitable response to their paragraph 3

 

Could somebody that knows what they are doing have a read through my attempt and point me in the right direction for my response to P3 ??????

 

This is my revised defence

 

1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted and it is accepted that in the past I have had financial dealings with Tesco Personal Finance. Given the age of the alleged agreement I do not recollect the precise details and believe the claimant has failed to provide the particulars of its claim. I have therefore sought clarity from the Claimant by way of a section 78 request and a CPR31.14.

 

3. Paragraph 2 is denied that any legal assignment or Notices of Assignment has been served pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136 as stated by the Claimant or by Tesco.

 

4. Paragraph 3 ?????????????

 

5. Paragraph 4 is denied. I am not aware of any service of a Default Notice pursuant to section 87 of the consumer credit Act 1974.

6.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show and evidence any breach and service of a default notice/termination notice:

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

7. On receipt of this claim I requested from the claimant a CPR 31.14 and a section 78 for copies of any documents and the agreement referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. To date they have failed to comply to either my section 78 request or CPR 31.14 and remain in default of my request.

 

8. As per Civil Procedure icon Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

9. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit icon Act 1974.

 

10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copy their para 3 into the search cag box of the top redtool bar

Thats what i do

The rest is ok

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You DX

 

I have amended one that seems ok to me Your thoughts?

 

4. Paragraph 3 No documents supporting the claim in the particulars have been offered nor have any dates of agreement been stated

The defendant cannot establish what agreement it is that this action is based upon and so the claimant's claim appears without merit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its just the way your POC got spaced

 

here it is in the normal format that makes 3 a lot easier to respond too:

 

1.This claim is for the sum of £9800 in respect of monies owing under an agreement with the account no.XXXXX pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974(CCA)

 

2.The debt was legally assigned by Hoist Portfolio Holding Ltd (Ex Tesco Finance) to the claimant and notice has been served.

 

3.The defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement.

A default notice has been served upon the defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA

 

4.The claimant claims

1 The sum of £9800

2 Costs

 

so:

 

reply would be

 

Paragraph 3 is denied. I do not recall ever receiving a Default Notice pursuant to s.87(1) CC. from the original creditor or any advance notice or warning of arrears

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a new paragraph space between Agreement and A default

But must be a typo

 

I shall add your #4

 

My time runs out Sunday at midnight

Am I best to file my defence on MCOL just before that time?

Also is it wise to send a paper version to the court for Monday a.m delivery?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ideally your defence was legally due by 4pm todayas sunday is a w/end and it wont be registered till Monday am.

but I wouldn't panic at all.

 

just make sure your paras are now aligned

you don't need to file the red POC

just copy and paste it into the MCOL website

all done.

 

they then have 28days to do 'something' else the claim will get autostayed.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm worried now.....I called the court and asked which date was my deadline and she said 20th

I assumed filing online would allow me until midnight of that day

 

I'm never lucky so I'm quite sure there will be more to come on this one

 

Thank you very much for your time and efforts it is really appreciated

I will make a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...