Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • lolerz
      my Leasehold/Freehold property and it's issues.

      By lolerz · Posted

      You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • tobyjugg2
      The Power Of Nature.Wild Weather.Climate Change.

      By tobyjugg2 · Posted

      China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • HP Mum
      my Leasehold/Freehold property and it's issues.

      By HP Mum · Posted

      Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Stripeycat
      PRA Claimform - Old Barclaycard debt

      By Stripeycat · Posted

      Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • Stripeycat
      PRA Claimform - Old Barclaycard debt

      By Stripeycat · Posted

      It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Employment Tribunal Help Please

deedee43
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

deedee43

deedee43

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thank you for your reply .

I was employed for 5 years .

I have a hearing in March i have to set out in writing what remedy the tribunal is being asked to award .

They weren't interested in settling during conciliation .

Unfair redundancy .

They dispute it all .

The company is run by my husband who i am in the process of divorcing .

Link to post
Share on other sites
lostfaith

lostfaith

Posted
Posted (edited)

Sorry to hear that; I found something here - https://www.monacosolicitors.co.uk/templates/ - but a more experienced person may help later; just thought to give them idea for some time so they know boundaries to try and help with - just from my past experience it was not nice to go through. I hope you get it sorted.

Edited by lostfaith
grammer
Link to post
Share on other sites
sangie5952

sangie5952

Posted
Posted
Hi , I have got a tribunal claim going on and need some help with drafting my letters , i would be very grateful for any help offered . Thank you

 

What letters? To who? This isn't very much information, and you really need to tell us a lot more before we understand what you are talking about. I hope you have some solid evidence, because tribunals don't like being involved in personal disputes. I'm not saying that's what is going on, but divorces tend to make them look for vendettas in proceedings, which is inevitably going to be at least part of the defence. I don't need a lot of detail to see that coming!

 

So please start at the beginning - tell us why you think it was unfair and what has happened - and what you are stuck with...

Link to post
Share on other sites
deedee43

deedee43

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thank you for your reply , there is no need for you to sound so patronizing , i don't need your opinion on the tribunals as i understand what they are there for and this is not a personal dispute . All i need help with is the wording of my letters that is all im stuck with thank you very much .

Link to post
Share on other sites
sangie5952

sangie5952

Posted
Posted
Thank you for your reply , there is no need for you to sound so patronizing , i don't need your opinion on the tribunals as i understand what they are there for and this is not a personal dispute . All i need help with is the wording of my letters that is all im stuck with thank you very much .

Wow. That will teach me to try to help you. Good luck. I'm out. I hope someone who also has the odd 30 years experience of going to tribunals with cases is hanging around willing to be insulted by you. You really need to get a grip. Pull a tantrum like that in a tribunal and you will be out of the door so fast your feet won't touch the ground.

Link to post
Share on other sites
king12345

king12345

Posted
Posted
Wow. That will teach me to try to help you. Good luck. I'm out. I hope someone who also has the odd 30 years experience of going to tribunals with cases is hanging around willing to be insulted by you. You really need to get a grip. Pull a tantrum like that in a tribunal and you will be out of the door so fast your feet won't touch the ground.

 

Come on Sangie, don't be like that.

Just write a letter, any letter about anything for her...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Emmzzi

Emmzzi

Posted
Posted

I woud say breakdown in personl realtionship and inability to work together is a reason for dismissal for "some other significant reason." Not aure I'd have gone with redundancy but the outcome is the same.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Emmzzi

Emmzzi

Posted
Posted
Why was sangues reply patronising?

I didn't find it that way at all.

 

Tone can be very hard to read in the written word :/

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
ericsbrother

ericsbrother

Posted
Posted

at least the reasons for the divorce wont need explaining.

OP if you read through your original post you will hopefully see that it is so vague as to be incomprehensiible as to what you want othe rthan someone to help write letters. People dont send letters to Tribunals, they send statements, evidence submissions etc. This may seem picky butknowing about the procedure and its terminology will help you massively and this means either reading up on it or passing the whole lot on to a professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
steampowered

steampowered

Posted
Posted

Good to hear that you have got what you need for now deedee43.

 

For what its worth, I thought sangie's reply was helpful rather than patronising. She definitely knows what she is talking about. It is very difficult to convey tone across the internet so it is easy to misread things.

 

Feel free to post further details if you need more help.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...