Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's genuinely amazing how you managed to rebuke pretty much all of my points without giving a single shred of evidence to prove it. When asked for evidence all you claim is that "it's clear cut" but how is anyone here meant to know if you won't show it?   I agree with this. If you can't convince us, how are you going to convince the judges when this inevitably goes to court?
    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Mortimer claimform - old EGG loan debt


s8n
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2355 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys.

 

I was called by a company called Cabot on 15/08/2017 re debt.

They didn't go into detail as i was on holiday.

 

I ended up coming back later than planned and ended up coming back on 28th.

Since then we have had some family emergencies so was unable to deal with stuff.

 

I called them yesterday and they said they where calling in regards to an Egg loan (which i dont remember).

They said they couldn't discuss things as the case had gone through to their sister company a Solicitors firm called Mortimer Clarke.

 

I called Mortimer Clarke today.

They said they cannot deal with the case as it was being claimed through the courts.

I asked for details re the loan.

 

All they could provide was:

1. a date the original loan was taken out (Dec 2007),

2. The default date.

3. The last payment date.

 

They cant tell me:

A. how much the loan was for

B. Probably not be able to get the original credit agreement.

C. Statement on the account

D. How much the last payment was

E. How much the default amount was

 

I said if i put in a CCA request formally then do they have to provide.

She said they may not have it.

 

Although she was hesitant and trying to avoid the topic of the Agreement.

I got an email address to send the formal CCA to.

 

They said a bulk court claim had been put in and they couldn't do anything with the claim now until i respond to paperwork.

I haven't lived at the address they said the details where sent to for about 2 to 3 years so haven't received anything.

 

The girl provided me with a number for the court but no name so asked me to call them for a copy of the paperwork.

 

I asked to put the account on hold and explained the situation about traveling but they where not having any of it.

 

What do i do?

Please help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Northampton county court bulk centre will have the court claim details and you should be able to get the details so you can acknowledge it, to defend in full.

 

Give them a phone call ASAP. Mention that the claimant has bern unhelpful in supplying the info and deliberately sent the court claim to an old address.

 

Click on bulk centre above for a link to telephone numbers.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

also once you have that info, its easy to stop cabot in their tracks. VERY easy. But first, try and remain calm and get that info as stated above.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Northampton county court bulk centre will have the court claim details and you should be able to get the details so you can acknowledge it, to defend in full.

 

Give them a phone call ASAP. Mention that the claimant has bern unhelpful in supplying the info and deliberately sent the court claim to an old address.

 

Click on bulk centre above for a link to telephone numbers.

 

Thank you. I will do that today.

 

also once you have that info, its easy to stop cabot in their tracks. VERY easy. But first, try and remain calm and get that info as stated above.

 

How would i do that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't made the request yet.

What act do i need to state for this?

 

Also the girl mentioned the CCA request will not hold back court proceedings.

I also offered to start making payments, just until i work this out.

They said this wouldn't help either.

 

Should i provide them with my true address, or a safe address where i can get the mail from?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply ring Northampton MCOL and tell them that this claimant has issued a claim against you using an old address...ask can they provide a copy of the claim pack or at least the details of the N1 so that you can defend it (subject to the date it was issued)...once you have this we can then advise on sending a CCA

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy.

 

I have been trying to call them since last week.

The phone just rings for a while.

Then cuts out.

 

How long do i have to respond to the claim they made from the date they sent the documents (30/08/2017).

 

i have spoken to the court and MK.

The court are emailing me an Acknowledgement of Service Letter which will give me a further 14 days to put together a defence.

Also they are emailing me the particulars of the claim.

 

I also spoke to Mortimer,

they put a request in the day i asked for the agreement,

and said they cannot provide the agreement "probably because of the age of the account".

 

They can just provide me the last payment date, default date and amounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have 19 days from and including the date on the N1 (claim form) to acknowledge service and then a further 14 days to submit your defence...33 days in total

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you not ask for a copy of the claimform to be emailed to you?

as 3 people told you to do..

once you know the password you can do it online

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

I did. The guy at the court sent me an email with the particulars - below:

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Claimant

 

CABOT FINANCIAL (UK) LIMITED

1 KINGS HILL AVENUE

KINGS HILL

WEST MALLING

KENT

 

 

Claimant solicitor

 

MORTIMER CLARKE SOLICITORS

3RD FLOOR

16-22 GRAFTON ROAD

WORTHING

WEST SUSSEX

BN11 1QP

 

 

 

Defendant

 

MR ****** *******

## ****** Street

MANCHESTER

M## #**

 

 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

BY AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN IDEM RE EGG BANKING PLC & THE DEFENDANT ON OR AROUND 06/12/2007 ('THE AGREEMENT') IDEM RE EGG BANKING PLC AGREED TO LOAN THE DEFENDANT MONIES. THE DEFENDANT DID NOT PAY THE INSTALMENTS AS THEY FELL DUE & THE AGREEMENT WAS TERMINATED. THE AGREEMENT WAS ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT. THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 5###.##

 

 

 

 

Other info

 

Date issued: 30-AUG-2017

Amount Claimed: £ 5###.##

Court Fee: £ 410.00

Solicitor’s Costs: £ 100.00

Total: £ 5###.##

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Along with attached documents: a guidance document, and N9, N9a and N9b

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you a box of text titled important note:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its the N9 ...there wont be a password provided on the email DX just the basics.

 

http://justclaim.co.uk/court-forms/N9-response-pack.html

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you a box of text titled important note:

 

No other text like that except:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

If you are returning your claim response or any claim response forms to the court by email then you MUST state the phrase ‘CLAIM RESPONSE’, together with your claim number, in the subject line of your email. Please note all full admissions must be sent directly to the claimant or their solicitor.

 

Thank you for your enquiry,

 

Please read these notes carefully - they will help you decide what to do next.

 

Court staff can help you complete the reply forms and tell you about court procedures. They cannot give legal advice.

If you need legal advice you should contact a solicitor or the Citizens Advice Bureau immediately.

You must respond to this claim form within 14 days of the date of service. The attached forms may be used for that purpose.

The date of service is taken as 5 days after the issue date.

 

If you agree with all of the claim and wish to pay it now

 

Take or send the money, including any interest and costs, to the claimant. The address for payment is on the front of the claim form. You should ensure that the claimant receives the money within 14 days of the date of service. There is further information on how to pay below.

 

If you agree with all of the claim and are asking for time to pay

 

Complete the admission form (N9A) and send it directly to the claimant within 14 days of the date of service. Please see the address on the front of the claim form to which documents are to be sent. Do not send a copy to the court.

Filing an admission may result in Judgment being entered against you

 

If you admit only part of the claim

 

Complete the admission form (N9A) and the defence form (N9B) and send them both to the court within 14 days of the date of service.

 

If you disagree with the claim or if you want to make a claim against the claimant (counterclaim)

 

You must send either the completed acknowledgment of service form or a defence to the court within 14 days of the date of service. If you send the acknowledgment of service you must send a defence to the court to arrive no later than 28 days from the date of service.

 

Registration of Judgments

 

If this claim results in a Judgment against you, details will be entered on a public register, the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines. These details will then be available for credit reference agencies to pass onto credit grantors and others seeking information on your financial standing. This will make it difficult for you to get credit. A list of credit reference agencies is available from the Registry Trust Limited, 173/175 Cleveland Street,

London, W1T 6QR.

 

Costs and Interest

 

Additional costs and interest may be added to the amount claimed on the front of the claim form if Judgment is entered against you. If Judgment is for £5,000 or more, or is in respect of a debt which attracts contractual or statutory interest for late payment, the claimant may be entitled to further interest.

 

How to Pay

 

• payments must be made to the person named in the address for payment box quoting any reference and the court case number.

• do not bring or send payments to the court - they will not be accepted.

• you should allow at least 4 days for your payments to reach the claimant or their representative.

• make sure that you keep records and can account for all payments made. Proof may be required if there is any disagreement. It is not safe to send cash unless you use registered post.

• a leaflet giving further advice about payment can be obtained from any county court.

• if you need any further information you should contact the claimant or the claimant’s representative.

 

Please note: The attached form(s) contains fillable form fields, and the software to complete the form can be downloaded for free from http://get.adobe.com/uk/reader.

 

Please see the attached blank claim response forms.

 

Regards,

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Its the N9 ...there wont be a password provided on the email DX just the basics.

 

http://justclaim.co.uk/court-forms/N9-response-pack.html

 

Andy

 

Cool, i will use the N9.

 

Also, i have just found a letter that had my new correct address on it from February. It starts with:

 

"Welcome to Cabot

We have recently confirmed that you live at the above address..."

Link to post
Share on other sites

the acknowledgement of service is done.

 

So i have a few questions:

 

1. Will i have to represent in court or can it be done in paperwork?

 

2. Do i need to get a solicitor (i cant really afford one).

 

Now i see 2 issues with their case:

 

1. They cannot provide me much information (as mentioned above) including the consumer credit agreement. They can only provide me the default date, default amount and last payment date. Also i dont have recollection of this particular debt.

 

2. They contacted me on 14/08/2017 whilst i was abroad by phone, and i told them they need to call back in a few weeks as i was away. I didn't receive a call, or further communication. By 30/08/2017 they submitted the CC claim.

 

3. They Sent a letter to my new (temporary) address saying they have proven I am there and sent me subsequent letters, i didn't get them at the time as they where posted into the wrong mail box. They then applied for the Court claim on my old address.

 

One of the biggest issues i have with these things is the "debts" keeps being sold, and in any year i have 20+ letters for a particular debt.

I dont know which debts are which and which companies are covering what.

I wish they wouldn't do that.

 

Any help would be vital and great.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the acknowledgement of service is done.

 

So i have a few questions:

 

1. Will i have to represent in court or can it be done in paperwork? - if it gets that far, yes you have to go

 

2. Do i need to get a solicitor (i cant really afford one).- no never.

 

 

you need to go read other claimform threads with the same players

 

as far as I can see you've read none unless you've don't it whilst not logged in.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? - Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd -

 

Date of issue - 30/08/2017

 

Date to submit defence - 29/09/2017

 

What is the claim for –

1.by an agreement between idem re egg banking plc & the defendant on or around 06/12/2007 ('the agreement') idem re egg banking plc agreed to loan the defendant monies.

2.the defendant did not pay the instalments as they fell due & the agreement was terminated.

3.the agreement was assigned to the claimant.

4. the claimant therefore claims £5500

 

What is the value of the claim? - £5500

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? -- Loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? - - According to Cabot Finance information 06/12/2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - Cabot

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?- A notice was received to my new address.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? -- No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

 

Why did you cease payments? - - I needed to identify what the payment was to as there where numerous creditors and I didn’t recognise this one. Additionally the loss of income.

 

What was the date of your last payment?- According to Cabot records

Default date: 06/03/2012

Last paid: 02/12/2015 (No payment amount information provided)

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?- There is no Communication with Egg Banking PLC and I have been advised against contacting egg banking by Cabot and Mortimer. Egg have said they are no longer dealing with this.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?- - At the time no, as there was a dispute on the origin of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you sent off cca/cpr?

 

oh and one tip reading back over all your previous threads

2 of which are previous claims which you sadly appear to have bodged upi totally by not following advice and doing your own thing...

STOP PHONING DCA's and and their solicitors...you've been advised lots of times not to do that ..but you appear to still do it..dont!!

 

please do as you are advised

not what you think you need to do

always check here first before you do anything

else you'll bodge this claim too!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i have done so, but i fear i dont have enough days for them to respond.

I believe i have until 02/10/2017 to respond to the courts.

They did say they were going to send confirmation that they could not provide the CCA as the debt was too old.

- Not yet received.

 

I agree with you, they where expensive mistakes.

I think my default setting is to need to talk as the contacting them in writing feels like it takes too long,

especially with Cabot and Mortimers Solicitors moving extremely slowly.

 

Mortimers Solicitors have already said they cannot provide me with the original CCA except the information i have provided above.

 

I do agree,

i will stop contacting them by phone and ensure everything is in writing.

Also, i will definitely follow only the advice here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your defence needs filing by 4pm Friday.

 

if they've not responded

then find the holding / no paperwork defence on 100's of threads here

 

post it up before filing so we can check it.

 

you'll also have to email your defence

please send it to [email protected] and ensure you quote “Claim response” and quote the claim number in the subject field.

.

[becareful there are no spaces in the email ad]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are up late!

 

By the way, Thank you and the rest of the guys for all the assistance thus far!

 

Will do,

any particular ones i should look out for.

I will try and draft it up tonight.

I do not have access to mcol for this claim so i presume i need to post it by snail mail and recorded.

 

Will do as soon as you guys have confirmed the defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

off you go have a try ..

 

search CAG box top red toolbar

 

cabot Mortimer claimform loan

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of claim: (As Written)

 

BY AN AGREEMENT* BETWEEN IDEM RE EGG BANKING PLC** & THE DEFENDANT ON OR AROUND 06/12/2007* ('THE AGREEMENT') IDEM RE EGG BANKING PLC AGREED TO LOAN THE DEFENDANT MONIES.*

 

THE DEFENDANT DID NOT* PAY THE INSTALMENTS AS THEY FELL DUE & THE* AGREEMENT WAS TERMINATED.

 

THE AGREEMENT* WAS ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT.* THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS*** 55##.##******

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Other info

*

Date issued: 30-AUG-2017

Amount Claimed: £ 55##.##

Court Fee: £ 410.00

Solicitor’s Costs: £ 100.00

Total: £ 6###.##

 

1. The defendant contends that this county court claim was intentionally issued to the defendants old address proven by Appendix 1 (Letter from the Claimant stating that confirmation has been made of residence at the new address). Details of this claim where received direct from the court after the defendant contacted the claimant to access information re this debt from the claimant.

 

2. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

3. The Defendant denies owing any monies to the Claimant. The claimant has failed to provide any evidence of agreement / contract / breach as requested by CCA Request under Section 7 of the Consumer Credit Act of 1974 and CPR 31.14 and is in default of a Section 78 request.

 

4. The Claimant is put to strict proof that a notice of assignment was issued to, and received by the Defendant. The Defendant maintains that a notice of assignment was never received.*

 

5. As the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the*consumer credit Act 1974.

 

6. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued to and received by the Defendant.

 

7. As per*Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed and evidence any breach and notice of breach by way of a default notice or notice of sums in arrears.

 

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show and evidence service of a default notice/termination;

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

8. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Is this okay? I will print and post recorded delivery before 5.30. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...