Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

XS Direct 3k Total Excess - Worried regarding Debt Collectors


Jayden1994
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2077 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey HB

 

Oh right okay, Will check that out.

 

Regardless of my current position/ situation I've learnt a lot of invaluable information from this site that I can actually use day to day. Always willing to learn a bit more if it can help myself or others who might run into the same scenario in the future that I might speak with.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all

 

Just spoke with a FOS Investigator, She is going to send me over the paperwork to complete to file this complaint and there I will outline everything to her from start to finish. If I'm honest it does not sound promising for myself but I will hope for the best.

 

If I recall she stated consumer credit was irrelevant as I was paying my premium on a monthly basis and not a lump sign so no agreement was signed or along them lines... Was pretty advanced information for someone with my experience on the matter.

 

I will let you know of the outcomes

 

Thanks again

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

But as soon as you have an accident with a debt obligation of up to £3k, they are inviting you by contract to become involved in paying them back the relevant sum. Given most people don't have £3k in savings, then an arrangement would have to made, but no details are given upfront. It would not be exact, but it might be them saying that they would allow x no. of months to pay, no interest would be charged etc.

 

And they offered no alternative. If the premium was only £50 more expensive per year not to have this £3k excess applied to third party claims, then surely that was something reasonable to offer an an alternative. If they said that by having a fault accident, you would have a debt owed to XS Direct of up to £3k or if you paid £50 extra premium, they could offer a policy with no third party claim excess.

 

Make the argument and see what happens.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

But as soon as you have an accident with a debt obligation of up to £3k, they are inviting you by contract to become involved in paying them back the relevant sum. Given most people don't have £3k in savings, then an arrangement would have to made, but no details are given upfront. It would not be exact, but it might be them saying that they would allow x no. of months to pay, no interest would be charged etc.

 

And they offered no alternative. If the premium was only £50 more expensive per year not to have this £3k excess applied to third party claims, then surely that was something reasonable to offer an an alternative. If they said that by having a fault accident, you would have a debt owed to XS Direct of up to £3k or if you paid £50 extra premium, they could offer a policy with no third party claim excess.

 

Make the argument and see what happens.

 

 

 

I agree with this line, the policy provides no option other than to be in debt, this is different to an own damage excess where ultimately if you don't want to pay it, you don't make the claim.

 

For a business to place someone in this position without looking at the individuals risk acceptance criteria seems reckless to me, if say they took a guarantors details, checked you have the funds (which is how commercial policies work if there is a TP excess and satisfy the RTA obligation) , scored you on your perception to risk then that would be different. Anyone who deals in loans/pensions/finance will have a better understanding of this risk than me.

 

The question is then should a reckless organisation be allowed to place you in that position of risk over (as mentioned already) what could be a trivial amount of policy increase.

 

The black and white of this is on the face of it the insurance company have done this by the book, you need to point out that by the book isn't enough to protect a consumer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all for a claim being made against me, Not a claim raised from myself.

 

Thanks for the info though I will incorporate all of this in my complaint to the FOS. Not sure what evidence I can attach as there isn't really none when disputing this type of thing.

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think you might be misunderstanding this and you need to be clear.

 

You are legally required to have third party insurance by law under Road Traffic Acts. Your Insurance is noted on Motor Insurance Database. What your policy says on third party liability, is that XS Direct will deal with third party claims on your behalf. But there is an excess of £3k and in the event of a claim, XS Direct will settle the third parties claim in full, but you would have to refund XS Direct up to £3k. They are NOT leaving you to deal with third party claims directly, as i then doubt the Insurance woulld comply with Insurers legal requirement on third party liability cover.

 

If you look at what you were told on the phone when arranging the policy, they are making a big assumption that you have £3k savings to pay XS if you had a fault accident. Yet they never really explained the claims process and how you pay XS the £3k back, if you did not have the money. They are telling you by buying this policy, that you could owe XS Direct a debt of up to £3k and not telling you the terms. This cannof be right and must be an unfair contract. This unfairness is made worse by no alternative being offered.

 

With a normal insurance policy you have an excess on damage to your own car and if you did not have the excess money, you would have to save up, before getting the car repaired.

 

You don't need any evidence, other than the policy you were sold and the information on the sales process e.g call recording. It is then trying to persuade FOS that the contract is unfair.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right Okay, That makes more sense now. Thank you. Today or tomorrow I will write my letter up within the complaint and send it off mentioning the above as my main argument in addition to a couple other pieces of information you provided me with.

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea that would be greatly appreciated, I will attach it here for all to take a look at if they have the time and to let me know of any edits I should make. A template would help due to my inexperience on these matters but regardless I will still attempt to write up the best letter I can addressing the above.

 

As the FOS investigator sent me a complaints form to fill out I told her I would write my full complaint/ reasoning on a seperate word document instead of using the small box they offer on the form and she was fine with it.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you start to put the FOS info together, i would suggest you look at ICOBS 5 & 6 in this link, plus also look at distance selling rules, as you bought the policy by phone.

 

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/ICOBS

 

5 is about identifying your needs i.e is the policy suitable. Unless you have significant savings in the Bank, having a policy with a debt obligation of up to £3k, is unlikely to be suitable. What happens if a Policyholder has 2 fault accidents within a short space of time ? Both claims mean a debt owed to XS Direct of over £5k bringing them above the threshold for Bankruptcy. No sufficient warning is offered about the potential debt consequences of taking out such a policy.

 

This is not a standard Car Insurance that was offered, as normally the Insurers fully cover liability to third parties with no excess. In the event of fault accidents, the financial consequence could be ruinous to many people. Yet no details are provided about how XS Direct would handle any debt owed to them and Insure your motor who sold the policy did not offer any alternative product that did not contain such a potentially financially damaging unusual feature.

 

You are going to sit down and start putting your thoughts together looking at the information you have. It is important you understand it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the damage to the other vehicle £3k or more? If the damage less than £3k, consider getting a loan/overdraft to pay for the damage without involving the insurance company. At least with a loan you may be able to spread out the repayments over 3 - 5 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its more, So they will be asking for the full 3k @Surfer01

 

If I'm honest I am really worried about writing a letter up of such importance at this crucial stage as I don't think I will word it correctly nor articulate the key points of my argument that could potentially be valid in the right way...

 

If you don't mind me asking if anyone would be willing to write said letter for me I would be willing to pay them for this, I just do not want to rush it nor create a sub-par document to send to the FOS investigator. If not I will sit down and do it myself to the best of my ability, No worries just a suggestion to ensure the best document I can.

 

Kind Regards

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jayden, you need to own this for your own good. Your comments to this thread evidence that you write very well and can easily write a letter. It will help you, as you may need to do this in future.

 

I have already written quite lengthy posts covering various points. I am sure you could copy and paste some parts of comments into a letter. I would not start writting letters for people on an internet forum such as this and payment would not be allowed anyway.

 

I am sure Surfer was trying to be helpful, but you can't take over a claim for Insurers and start taking on greater liability, taking out loans etc. What would be the point of insurance. Bad enough having taken out a £3k all sections excess policy.

 

Start to put something together and post it here for comment.

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay however I still think that if you have to pay the £3k, then get a loan somewhere as that may be a lot cheaper than paying their rates if they allow you to pay off the £3k over time. Their rates may be in the vicinity of 28%APR whereas a loan would be a lot lower. Are you also claiming for the damage to your vehicle? Don't worry about debt collectors as you are a long way from that stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Surfer, do you know that XS Direct charge interest on a repayment arrangement ?

 

This info is not known and if you have this info it would be a major part of this FOS complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did use the word "may" as I do not know.

 

It seems common that when there is a payment scheme with an insurance company the APR is close to 28%.

Either way the OP has to pay the £3K and a loan may be cheaper.

 

There is also a possibility that the OP could then be locked into the insurance company at renewal time as they are paying off the £3K. Rather safe than sorry.

 

The OP if they are going to have a repayment scheme with the insurance company need to establish the APR, the term and whether they would be locked in at renewal time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My renewal is available end of this month but the my policy is finished end of June.

 

At this point in time I would be unable to get any loan for less APR than 28% anyways due to other financial responsibilities I have at the moment (Currently repaying a loan etc).

 

You state one way or another I will have to repay it, What if the FOS deem my argument valid? Not the most encouraging thing to hear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did use the word "may" as I do not know. It seems common that when there is a payment scheme with an insurance company the APR is close to 28%. Either way the OP has to pay the £3K and a loan may be cheaper. There is also a possibility that the OP could then be locked into the insurance company at renewal time as they are paying off the £3K. Rather safe than sorry. The OP if they are going to have a repayment scheme with the insurance company need to establish the APR, the term and whether they would be locked in at renewal time.

 

We should stick to what is definite. Yes Insurers charge for monthly instalments relating to premium payment, but that information is given upfront. This thread is about a third party liability excess of £3k that XS Direct expect as a lump sum immediately with no repayment plan.

 

The FOS complaint needs to be addressed first and if the FOS don't uphold it, then that is when options about repayment would have to be looked at

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My renewal is available end of this month but the my policy is finished end of June.

 

At this point in time I would be unable to get any loan for less APR than 28% anyways due to other financial responsibilities I have at the moment (Currently repaying a loan etc).

 

You state one way or another I will have to repay it, What if the FOS deem my argument valid? Not the most encouraging thing to hear.

 

Don't worry about this. Get your FOS complaint written using info you already have.

 

Surfer cannot be right that XS Direct can start loaning the XS money at interest, because as far as i know this was never part of the Insurance contract.

 

The whole point of the FOS complaint is that Policyholders are being placed into a debt obligation they might not be able to service, just by having an accident. Yet neither Insure your motor or XS Direct looked into your finances.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Surfer, do you know that XS Direct charge interest on a repayment arrangement ?

 

This info is not known and if you have this info it would be a major part of this FOS complaint.

 

Page 20

 

https://www.onecalldirect.co.uk/existingCustomers/website-documents/getDocument.php?doc_name=1488541941Motor-XSD-Insurance-Policy-Wording.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...