Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statute barred on 20 year so called debt with gardening company?


marcelle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2585 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there and wonder if anyone can help.

 

Unfortunately,

my husband passed away a couple of years ago and he handled all the payments of bills, etc.

 

 

since the 90s we hired a company to tend to the garden once a month and they billed us quarterly.

The problem is that two years ago when i went to pay for the services for the proceeding months ahead, they told me we haven't paid them since 1997 and gave a bill for a few thousand as they are saying it's back dated from then until now.

 

i told them that my husband would have paid them, and he always paid things like this in cash, and they should have a record as i cannot find any receipts of payment.

 

They said they will take me to court if i don't provide receipts as proof of payment but i cannot find any receipts .

I told them if it's true that he didn't pay, why was service still continued after all this time?

 

Their response was that the computer automatically generated the service to be met

i told them I cannot find anything but shouldn't they be providing proof that money is owed???

Also wouldn't this be classed as statute barred as well?

 

In actual fact, when i was first presented with this information about this so called debt,

i did pay them for the next six months as i still wanted the service of the gardener but the money was not to go towards the "debt".

 

How should i proceed with this one.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are correct, that someone from this gardening company is trying to take advantage of you.

 

Of course if anyone is providing services, they will invoice you each time and if they are not paid, they would simply not continue to provide the service. So the only bill that would be outstanding would be the last time they did your garden.

 

If i had an elderly relative in this situation, i would be thinking of reporting this to the Police. This appears to be an attempt to commit fraud and fortunately you have been alert to this.

 

It is up to you, but if you reported this to your local neighbourhood Police team on their local number 101, i am sure they would take this seriously. No gardening company would provide services beyond a few months without getting paid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that I would hold back on fraud allegations at this point.

 

Although it seems extraordinary that these people might have carried on providing the service without being paid for 20 years, it is just feasibly possible.

 

If you start making allegations of fraud which later on you can't prove, then it could undermine your credibility generally. I would go slowly on this.

 

The first thing is to deal with your question about whether it is statute barred.

 

The answer is that any alleged debts beyond six years are statute barred unless you have acknowledged them or paid something towards them during that time. It seems here that you have not so we can pretty well say that 14 years of the alleged debt would not be enforceable anyway.

 

You have paid six months for a continuing service that you have stipulated that this money is not to be used towards the alleged debt. I'm afraid that I think it would be difficult to enforce this. How did you stipulate this condition? Was it in writing?

 

I think that making payment of six months in advance effectively creates a trust and if one of the conditions of the trust is that the money is not to be applied to some existing debt then technically it is binding. On the other hand, if they decided to ignore you and simply take the money as part of a set off towards the money they say you owe them then the only way you could challenge this would probably be to go to a Small Claims Court.

 

I must say that a judge probably wouldn't be very impressed to hear that a company is so disorganised that they are not able to recognise when the services they are providing are not being paid for – for a period as long as 20 years! It certainly seems pretty incredible.

 

I think that one of the things that you should do should be to ask them to provide you paperwork in respect of all of the services which they are provided to you in the past and which they allege has not been paid.

 

It will be interesting to see exactly what it is they can produce.

 

I understand that they say that they have a computer which automatically generates the service to be met. However, did they have this computer system in 2007? They were a pretty advanced small business/gardening services company if they did.

 

Although I understand that your husband paid things like this in cash, surely there must be more detailed than that. Are there no details of cash withdrawals at about the right time of each month – or about the right time of each quarter?

 

If it was paid in cash, then was it paid directly to the gardener or was it paid directly to their office?

 

And for the moment you may as well tell us who are they? Where are they? How much money are we talking about here – per month, per quarter, for the preceding six years, and for the whole 20 year period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are so disorganised about getting paid for work, how are they managing to pay staff, operating costs, taxes due ?

 

The reason i suggested fraud, is why has it taken so long to find out they have not been paid. It just seems a little bit convenient that there has been a bereavement of the person who had been paying the account. Any company who is ensuring proper accounts are done will have a ledger they can go back to check on. They don't ask a customer to prove payment going back 20 years.

 

How many other people has this company written to along similar lines ? Are they all elderly people ?

 

I appreciate offering benefit of the doubt and not jumping to conclusions, but i hear of many situations where elderly people are taken advantage of.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

do name the company. is it a big company...

wld trading standards be an option to poss have a chat with re?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it unlikely that a company that has failed to raise invoices is now asking you for copies of them to show you have paid. They should of course have their copies of the paperwork so you should reverse the situation and ask for copies of the invoices and receipts they have issued so you can compare them to your records.

How to proceed? Find another gardener si the first action so you then have a fixed time that the matter can occupy. If you continue to use them it will ony complicate things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...