Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Company wants copy of passport after 10 years


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2620 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The company I work for is a global company employing thousands.

 

 

Yesterday HR emailed us to say that it is a legal requirement to have a copy of out passports.

 

 

Can they legally demand this?

 

 

Personally I haven't got one and I was born here and am 38 years old.

 

 

Can they demand them from the people that have them?

 

 

Surely a national insurance number and paying tax proves this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, and no. No they can't demand you get a passport. But have a NINO and paying tax isn't good enough. Employers are required to have sight of documents that prove your identity and right to work in the UK. A passport is the easiest form of proof, but there are others. Explain to HR and they will tell you what will do instead. And they should have sight of the original documents too, not just copies of them. The copies they should make and put on file as evidence they have done so. Plus, naughty them, they should have done this a long time ago!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

The forum regulars will tell you more about this, but we've seen this before. Are they checking on people's right to work in the UK or something like that?

 

And have you asked HR what they will accept in place of a passport?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the absence of a Passport, other documents will suffice - normally a Full Birth Certificate plus proof of your NI number, such as your NI Card

 

Sounds like the employer may have been challenged over the immigration status of an employee and now need to prove that they conduct the necessary due diligence checks

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks like birth certificate will be the relevant document.

 

Anything else doesnt prove that you are entitled to live and work in the UK, even NI number as that could have been issued to a temporary worker.

 

Having said that, sometimes even a birth cert doent prove you are a UK national as you may not be if your parents werent.

 

There is another problem, it is unlawful to copy a UK passport so they would need SIGHT of it and make a note of the number.

 

However, as the govt doesnt use joined up thinking it still tells companies and local govet agencies to break the law by copying them.

 

Many moons ago I used to have the same propblem with my Class 1 Safety Certificate ( explosives licence) there are 2 different conditions, acquiring explosives and acquiring and keeping.

 

however, you dont need one for keeping so when it expired they tried to say I was in unlawful possesion of explosives when there is no such crime if you acquired them legally.

 

The problem in both of these cases is the assumption thaat theere is only one method of doing things when there isnt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is but even government advice tells companies and individuals to do this. I am not concerned with pasports from other countries, they have their own laws but to copy a UK passport in Britain is a breach of Crown Copyright so the penalties are not huge but nevertheless exist as it is unlawful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that it is not lawfully be reproduced (read copy a passport) but you are missing the next bit of the sentence, namely: "without the prior permission", since for the purpose that is being discussed within this thread is confirming the right to work permission to copy has been granted by the government here: https://www.gov.uk/check-job-applicant-right-to-work

 

In fact the passport office themselves advise passport holders to photocopy the passport, thus again permission has been granted to photocopy.

It is easier to enter a rich man than for a camel to pass a needle

Link to post
Share on other sites

UK citizens have to show Birth cert and evidence of NI number Other documents not needed or not valid. So, to confuse matters even more if the OP showed his passport then that is not proof of the right to work in the UK for a UK citizen.

See what I mean about the govt giving bad or incorrect advice. This would mean that the copying of ther passport was done without permission as the reason given isnt valid! Their "factsheets" start off with the wrong assumptions and so people are forced to follow the wrong path..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is but even government advice tells companies and individuals to do this. I am not concerned with pasports from other countries, they have their own laws but to copy a UK passport in Britain is a breach of Crown Copyright so the penalties are not huge but nevertheless exist as it is unlawful.

 

I think you may be wrong on this. Every financial institution in the country prefers a copy of the passport as ID, as does every solicitor when having to prove the same. I certify copies on a regular basis and have never come across any issues. The one thing that is recommended is that copies are black and white.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UK citizens have to show Birth cert and evidence of NI number Other documents not needed or not valid. So, to confuse matters even more if the OP showed his passport then that is not proof of the right to work in the UK for a UK citizen.

See what I mean about the govt giving bad or incorrect advice. This would mean that the copying of ther passport was done without permission as the reason given isnt valid! Their "factsheets" start off with the wrong assumptions and so people are forced to follow the wrong path..

 

How are you figuring that out? UK citizens have the right to work in the UK, therefore possession of a UK passport would confirm citizenship and therefore the right to work. Passports of foreign nationals entitled to work in the UK will be endorsed with that right on their own passports.

 

There are plenty of things that the government does wrong. This is not one of them. The regulations underpinning the relevant law stipulate what evidence is required and how employers are too evidence this. So the regulations give "permission" because they constitute lawful instructions of the government. The list of acceptable documents is set out in regulations and a passport is one.

 

The guidance for employers explaining what they can accept and that they must copy original documents is here http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5604096

Link to post
Share on other sites

The list of acceptable documents is here: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/378926/employers_right_to_work_checklist_november_2014.pdf

It isn't limited to just Passport or BC+NI, there are lots of other combinations but those 2 are the easiest and most popular for UK citizens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CrappoMan's link isn't working for me, don't know if was this on but the list of documents if you don't have a passport (but do have unlimited right to work in the UK) - known as List A - is here:

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/571001/Employer_s_guide_to_right_to_work_checks.pdf#page=26

 

So, to confuse matters even more if the OP showed his passport then that is not proof of the right to work in the UK for a UK citizen.

 

Not true. If you hold "A passport showing the holder ... is a British citizen or a citizen of the UK and Colonies having the right of abode in the UK" (to quote List A) it means you have the right to work in the UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this link to avoid any further PDF/pdf issues - https://tinyurl.com/pkonvbb

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

everyone keeps quoting the wrong source of information. If you look at the legislation a UK birth certificate and UK passport are not themselves an absolute proof of right of residence or nationality according to the British Nationality Act 1981.

 

That is why I say that the govt websites give confusing and incorrect information but expect everyone to act on that duff gen.

 

same goes for proof of ID when opening a bank account. the banks are more scared of the regulator than they are of breaching other laws so they do things they arent lawfully entitled to do.

 

I cant pay my council tax without proving residence but they wont accept the council tax bill they sent me as proof of address or ID when paying it in person.

 

I also seem to have dragged this topic away from the original request for help and hopefully the OP has a birth cert and proof of NI via a tax form or the like.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

A birth certificate is not proof of identity, even if it yours.

 

Anyone can legally obtain (buy from the register of births) another person's birth certificate if they know the name of person, place of birth and the date of birth (give or take a year either side) all details shown on a birth certificate.

 

This opens another can of worms; if you show your birth certificate to HR, what is to stop someone in HR (a temp' for instance) from using your details to obtain a duplicate birth certificate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they obtain it to commit an offence than that is an offence in itself. the same would apply to using copies of any other document or even using the information on them for purposes other than that they were supplied for. A company got fined for that recently

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...