Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
    • I'd get back to them tomorrow, and explain the circumstances, that you have a wedding reception, and just appeal to their better nature. Hopefully they will be able to move sooner rather than later, especially if you go in in person and speak to them, and show them the issue.
    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What happens when business partner dies?


Shazzzbat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

So, the above email has been sent to the (probate) solicitors, and responded to. Most notably, it caused them to attempt to revise their fee, but my friend had contracted for a "full estate service" at a 1.5% of the estate fee. She challenged this and sent them a copy of the contract she had signed. I can upload a redacted copy if anyone wants me to (tomorrow).

 

My friend responded with: "paralegalX had informed me that the price you had quoted for the full estate administration service for Probate covered all aspects of K's Estate including "dealing with the business". I checked with her twice and clarified both times that the fee (percentage of the estate) would cover all legal advice and dealing with the sale of the café, the sale of the Lotus (it had not at that time been written off), and that this meant I would have no need to speak to LM direct. ParalegalX agreed twice that there would be no extra fees other than conveyancy costs and estate agents costs and that their firm were able to advise on all issues and aspects of the Estate. We also confirmed that the Estate included the fact that K and I had a house, that he had the Lotus car with LM acting as guarantor on the finance, and a 50% share in a business. At no time did paralegalX indicate that there would be any extra costs incurred by liaising with other departments within your organisation. She also confirmed that it would be in your best interests to gather as many assets into the Estate as this had a direct effect on your fees. I, therefore, would expect there to be no extra costs from yourselves, especially as I have managed to provide information on the matter that your corporate department purely need to verify. On appointing a Solicitor I do not expect to spend hours and hours seeking out legal information on your behalf and then to be given a revised fee rate"

 

Friends solicitors replied that "I have passed the relevant documents, including the loan agreement, the sales receipt and the business valuation to our corporate department for their consideration. I can confirm that our corporate team will charge their own fees as distinct from our fees for their advice on dealing with the business. This is because their specialist knowledge is required to work out the value of the business and how much might be due to the estate".

 

The concerns are:

 

1. That my friend is to be charged an additional fee without that having been made clear in advance

2. Very little (if any) progress has been made in the 9 months since K's death

3. How can their corporate department value a business, 9 months after the date on which the valuation should be based? LM could have devalued the business or concealed income (although yes, she might have increased the vale)

 

How should we reply? It's point 3 that could have the most impact on my friend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the Solicitors probate service only related to funds that are private, not any business issues such as the Partnership.

 

If the Paralegal has promised a full service including the business, then your friend should hold them to this.

 

The Solicitor i know ( no longer in practice in the UK) would have assessed the whole situation and dealt with everything. Most Solicitors are quite capable of dealing with all aspects, as they have qualified in all aspects and have access to libaries of information they need. The trouble with these large corporate type Solicitors, is that they have Paralegals/legal executives dealing with most enquiries and then Solicitors specialising in different things. The old fashioned Solicitors from smaller companies tend to deal with lots of different things and can handle it all, unless it is massively complex, which i don't think your friend case is.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that this corporate probate factory has done nothing to date that we can see, is that grounds enough to say we've lost confidence and will look elsewhere?

 

That would just let them off the hook. They would still want paying for the work they have done.

 

Suggest a written complaint to their senior partner. If you visit the Law Society website, you might be able to obtain details of the Solicitors in charge of the company and can complain.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah - but before we contact the solicitors again - what is the position with regards to "How can their corporate department value a business, 9 months after the date on which the valuation should be based? LM could have devalued the business or concealed income (although yes, she might have increased the sale)"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would ask an expert to give their opinion of the business's value at that point in time.

It is hard to value a business for the current date, easier to value it in retrospect as more information is available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question about the insurance for the car whose ownership is in dispute. It was insured for £37,000 (insurer's valuation) - the car value had increased as it was very specialist.

 

Purchase price: £32,995

KR paid a deposit of £6599.00.

KR then borrowed £26,396 + £7604.20 (cost of credit – interest/fees etc) = £34,000.20.

 

He was to pay 59 instalments of £564.92, commencing Jan 2013 - £33,330.28 and a final instalment of £669.92, making the total repaid £34,000.20. The 2 totals balance so that’s correct.

 

KR made 16 or 17 repayments when he died. Let’s say 16 – so he’d repaid £9038.72. That leaves outstanding finance of £24,961.48 at the time he died. The insurer sold the car (for scrap) for £26,000 – so the proceeds of the sale were £1038.52.

 

My question is would the insurer simply pay out the proceeds of the sale ie £26,000 minus outstanding finance of £24,961 - £1038 or

the full insured value of the car £37,000 minus the outstanding finance of £24,961 - £12,039

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

.....or as KR died, would the finance have been written off and not repaid by the insurer?

 

Insurance would normally pay the write off value, which would be the market value according to guides such as glass.co.uk at the time. Although on Insurance you state a value to give the Insurers an idea of value, the insurance policy would state that the cover was the market value at time of any loss. I don't think it was an actual write off, if the salvage value was £26000 compared to a market value of £37000. The Insurers would only pay out the repair cost, verified by an engineers inspection report.

 

Insurers would not involve themselves in the finance. I suspect what has happened here is that following the accident, the Insurers have simply paid the cost of the repair to the finance company and the finance company took the car back, as your friend did not want it. The finance company have then worked out what money was left after paying off the finance and sent this to the Solicitors.

 

This car was not a write off, if it still had a value of £26000, compared to market value of £37000. If there was major stuctural damage, then the salvage value would not be anywhere near £26000. The salvage value suggest the the car was repairable and in the end as your friend did not want to deal with it, the finance company dealt with if, taking the car back as it was owned by them.

 

Your friend should have had full details from the finance company stating exactly what happened, with a breakdown calculation of the amount left to her husbands estate.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...