Am I buggered? <scans attached>

[Bernie_the_Bolt]

Personally, I would add rather more to the defence:

 

In addition to the not the driver defence I would add:

 

The defendant further contends that, notwithstanding the defence in the previous paragraphs the Claimant is not entitled to any sums due as any amounts due under any purported contracts are unenforcable penalties. In this regard the defendant will cite the decision in Excel Parking Services v Hetherington-Jakeman at Mansfield County Court in 2008 and rely inter alia the case law quoted in the judgment.

[spinningfish]

Hello all

 

Right. Have the court date through from claimants OPC going through the small claims track.

 

I will be supplying copies of the letters sent to OPC and will be supplying the details of Excel Parking Services v Hetherington-Jakeman judgement.

 

Anything else I need to add, based on this thread?

 

Thanks as always!

[lamma]

Make that a notarised affidavit that not only denies she was the driver but also states where she was at the time.

[spinningfish]

Problem is, the incident was a good few years back now. I've not asked her, but I personally wouldn't have a clue what I was doing two weeks ago!!

[Esio Trot]

Problem is, the incident was a good few years back now. I've not asked her, but I personally wouldn't have a clue what I was doing two weeks ago!!

 

That should, in my eyes, work in your favour then.

 

It is up to the plaintiff to prove on the 'balance of probabilities' that both the car was at the place when the incident took place AND that the registered keeper was the driver to whom they have been corresponding.

[letshelp]

Yet another OPC speculative claim. Should be an easy one to defend.

regards

[spinningfish]

In that case, I'll just send copies of the letters sent to OPC and the details of Excel Parking Services v Hetherington-Jakeman judgement.

 

Thanks guys!

[spinningfish]

Won!!

 

The judge quoted contract law at the OPC representative and dismissed the case!!

 

Thank you everyone for your help!!

 

[DBC]

And yet, as reported over on MSE, this company is still sending out fake (i.e. unsealed) court papers. They must be one of the most incompetent PPCs on the planet.

[lamma]

well done, I hoe you asked for youe 50 quid costs. thats nil out of 7 or OPC isn't it.

[Al27]

Good work!

 

7th that's reached a hearing I think lamma. They threw in the towel before the day on another.

[Old Snowy]

I trust that those from Watchdog who read through these threads actually picks up on this and "names and shames" - especially about the apparently false court documents OPC are apt to send out every now and then.

 

Watchdog seem to have caught onto the fact that these charges are not fines now let's hope they cut to the chase and show this up for the complete [problem] that it is.

 

Well done, SF

[letshelp]

Won!!

 

The judge quoted contract law at the OPC representative and dismissed the case!!

 

Thank you everyone for your help!!

 

Another great result, well done.

regards