Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Folks,   Thank you for your help so far. Please find below the correspondence so far from various parties. If I've missed anything, please let me know. Again, apologies for not posting the correct stuff. I thought I'd lost it all, turns out it was on a rarely used pc Letter advising of change of address will be posted shortly, with proof of posting not tracked. Buncrana 1 Edited Notice To Keeper ECP.pdf 2 ECP Back of PCN.pdf 3 DRP Edited 25012021.docx 4 DRP Back of letter.docx 5 POPLA Appeal redacted.pdf 6 DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf ESSO Cobham Signage.pdf
    • Thanks just looked at SARequest It wouldn’t make ebay have to say why they suspended me. all their email said was that it was related to buying activity. But under that bike buying activity there are about five different reasons why it could’ve been. But they haven’t specified which of these five reasons it was.
    • Thank you Ethel, their letter was literally one line, with an added bonus of a typo..... "As you own the land that the property was damaged on we would not be able to dela with that aspect of the claim.", so I think it may be the initial fob off. I have replied just stating "This is not correct, the fence is owned by XYZ ltd, please clarify?", but will follow it up with a letter from the company. will let you know how I get on x
    • About a year ago i was summonsed to court for a speeding offence, long story short it wasn't me that was driving the vehicle, and i successfully proved that i had not received any paperwork (the reason it went to a summons) because there is a problem with our address, i live at number 7, yet when you look online to enter our address for anything you have 7, 5-7 and 7-9 on our street, one is my address and two are businesses.  The court ruled that there was an issue, and agreed i did not receive any paperwork (aside from me not being the driver)  i thought it odd that i never received anything in the post to say that, but they are the courts i assumed everything would be in order. Now just recently i have been using family members vehicles to get to work and have been insuring the vehicles on a temporary basis. Recently when using a comparison website i would get results and then when i went to make payment it would not let me advance, i had tried this on numerous sites and the same happened, i assumed that it would have been because i have used to many temporary insurances and it may have flagged for whatever reason. i went to check my license online, and i cant view it, it states below, i called the DVLA and they can not view any details either and have said they will need to raise a case internally to find out what has happened.  My wife and brother seem to think that the courts have screwed up not informed the DVLA of anything, hence i was banned. But surely it wouldn't have taken so long for me to stop being able to insure my vehicle on a temporary basis until just now?? Please can anyone assist as im worried sick now and ive done absolutely nothing wrong, i need my license for my job. .................... It has not been possible to display/match your driving licence. For further information regarding your driving licence details write to: Central Casework Group, Drivers Enquiries, DVLA, Swansea, SA6 7JL
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Reston Claimform - old Lloyds credit card debt -


julie1977
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

claim number showing

simple get her to sign the SB defence statement where required and send it back

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Defence submitted 7th Jan 2017 and they now on the 2nd May 2018 want it corrected and send back to them before the 11th May......15 months.....they are improving:wink:

 

 

Why did you tick the box to be Legal representative..?

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone,

 

I have just had a letter from the county courts advising of something called a small claims track?

 

Would anyone be able to advise me of what this is and how best to deal with this please

 

Andy- It was an error on my part......idiot I know 😬

Link to post
Share on other sites

So youve got your n180 then?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX100,

 

What does this mean for my wife now? It has a questionnaire on advising thatbitnhas to be filled in and returned by the 25th June. It states that she can either choose mediation or let it go to court? I am really confused *♀️

Link to post
Share on other sites

This allocates the claim to your local county court....simple to complete.

 

Yes to mediation

 

Yes to small claim track

 

1 witness ...yourself

 

The rest is self explanatory .

 

Run 3 copies and file and serve to the Court and claimants sol by the date stated...retain 1 for file.

 

Use the following and complete on your computer looks far more professional.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?406099-LEGAL-N180-Directions-Questionnaire-(Small-Claims-Track)-**Correct-at-Sept-2016**

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Sorry I am being very thick today.

Will my wife have to attend court?W

She is having a major tough time at the moment, parents are divorcing and her father and his companies is being investigated for fraud on a large scale

. I’m not sure that she could face court too .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if it gets that far

and its no big deal

Typically nothing more than a table sitdown

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx100 - I’m guessing that you mean the mediation option?

Via telephone?

 

My wife has worked incredibly hard to improve her credit file and we are literally on the verge of buying a house

 

. I hate even thinking this but if a settlement was agreed could she avoid a ccj on her file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you asked about court not mediation

Mediation will not happen if they dont cough up with an enfor agreement

 

No dont settle

There are 1001 ways fo avoid a CCJ before you need to do that with these fleecers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I requested a copy of the original agreement from both Cabot and restons, Cabot replied advising they had 12 days to cough up and then they wrote back later and said that they had a max of 40 days.

 

She has had nothing from them since.

 

Restons have been relentless despite none of them providing a true copy of the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree however they are not letting go (restons) not Cabot.

 

They initial case was stayed back in February due to them not getting back to the courts on time.

 

I then stupidly ticked to legal rep box in error.

 

Had another letter advising my wife to sign correctly and send back.

 

Now this form and questionnaire arrives today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that is what we used as defence, however this has only came about due to my wife’s father writing to the original creditor without my wife’s knowledge and offering them a payment of £5.00 paid by him from his account not my wife’s.

 

We didn’t even know anything about it until he closed this account down and that’s when they started this farce of a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The form you have was from the court not restons..yes?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that payments made by OC could affect when the account becomes SB.

If a well itentioned person wanted to pay some money off the account without your knowledge or permission does not unbar the SB status.

 

You can be 200% certain that Crapbot/Rectum did not enquire as to whether the OC were aware of this when they received the payment from a third party all they see is $$$$$ signs and it would never be SB,d

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that payments made by OC could affect when the account becomes SB.

If a well itentioned person wanted to pay some money off the account without your knowledge or permission does not unbar the SB status.

 

You can be 200% certain that Crapbot/Rectum did not enquire as to whether the OC were aware of this when they received the payment from a third party all they see is $$$$$ signs and it would never be SB,d

 

oc = original creditor

only payments by the person that signed the agreement can be taken as payments from them toward the agreement

any other payments would have to be proved to come from an account likewise owned by the signee or with written authority ftom the signee that it was with their permission....

 

its SB and not going anywhere

wit or without paperwork as there is none that can prove their parents payments were made with their written authority

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so return the N180

 

1 wit you

yes to mediation

the rest is obv

 

3 copies needed

1 to the court by the required date

1 to the solicitors [minus sig/email/phone]

1 for your file

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t even think rectums have even realised the payments were coming out of her fathers account not hers, nor have they checked.

 

Do I need to point this out to them or not?

 

Does this mean that the OC broke dpa at the beginning or does that not even make an argument for her case?

 

Thanks guys,

my head was battered when it arrived this afternoon in the post.

 

I will do the online form, print off and send all required copies to everyone.

 

I’ve read that these lot are good at getting backsoor ccj’s.

 

She really really cannot have one against her now 😞.

 

You guys are pure legends.x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...