Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2709 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

 

Earlier today I received a Notice of Issue of Warrant of Control from the County Court Business Centre, it reads;

 

Urgent

To the Debtor

 

You have not made payment under the judgement as you were ordered. The creditor has therefore asked for a warrant to be issued to the bailiff to seize and sell your goods. Unless you pay the amount due to the court before 02 December 2016 the bailiff will call and may remove your goods for sale at public auction. This may mean that you will have to pay further costs.

 

Total to Pay £179.25

Balance Outstanding £1,392.38

 

Dated 25th November 2016.

 

====

 

I have registered at MCOL and have my MCOL account details and Password but am unsure how to go ahead as I seem to be missing some information, MCOL asks for Claim Number and Defence Pack Passwords but these are not on the Warrant, just Case Number, Warrant Number, Local Number & Creditor's Ref.

 

===

 

At no point have I ever acknowledged the debt with Lowell Portfolio either by phone / letter or email.

 

The name on the warrant is also slightly incorrect, it has my title as Miss whereas I am a man in my late 40's. I don't know if this is relevant or not but thought best to mention it.

 

===

 

I am in no way capable of paying any of the outstanding amount.

 

Following a serious illness I am now long term disabled, my only income is ESA ( support group ) and High Rate DLA.

 

A little other information that may or may not be relevant, my home belongs to my Mother but I live here alone, I have no proof of ownership of any of the goods in the house and so understand that these can be / may be taken by the bailiffs.

 

I hope you can help me with this matter, if you need any further information i'll do my level best to post it here.

 

Thanks

AlanGBS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bailiff can only remove goods if you allow him peaceful entry to your home - invite him in which would be a seriously bad idea. He could however remove goods from outside if there are any, car,caravan, motorbike, quality garden furniture, to of the range BBQ etc.

 

The question has to be do you owe this? The name on the Warrant would be looked upon as being minor and be ignored.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying you never received any notification or any documents prior to this? If so when did you last move?

 

I have received letters from Lowell Portfolio regarding this debt, a debt that at no point was ever on my credit report ( possibly due to the slightly incorrect name, Miss / rather than Mr ).

 

Unfortunatley, in my error, acting on advice from a friend who called Lowell chancers and bullies, I ignored the letters.

 

However at no point was I told that this matter was going to court.

 

I have just paid £4 to the Registry Trust for my court records and it returned 'nothing registered'.

 

I haven't moved house in the last 15 years so it won't be that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now spoken to Lowell and a stop has been put on the warrant, in fairness they were actually very decent with me on the phone.

 

Not at all what I expected.

 

If you would like to save forum space you can lock / delete as applicable.

 

Thanks for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also meant to ask you if you have checked your Credit Files - Noddle is free but may take 24 hours or so to produce, the others give a free trial but can be expensive once it has expired so don't forget to cancel.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now spoken to Lowell and a stop has been put on the warrant, in fairness they were actually very decent with me on the phone.

 

Not at all what I expected.

 

If you would like to save forum space you can lock / delete as applicable.

 

Thanks for the help.

 

We have plenty of space and do not delete threads...if you could expand as to why and what exactly do they mean by " stop "...for the benefit of others and people that have advised you here.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well ofcourse lowells will be nice to you

they've just succeeded in getting a backdoor ccj against you

that in all truth you probably don't even owe it

 

and not only that

they through the court

have send a court bailiff to your door.

 

and you've rung them too.

hope you didn't promise any payments!

 

a dca is not a bailiff

and they've already donr all they can to you.

 

you indicate that the prefix was wrong on the claim form/CCJ

so it was in MISS alangbs

rather than MR alangbs?

 

eithway I bet the address was correct and it still didn't get thru.

 

whats the debt

if its not is your name the CCJ is useless

get it set aside by mutual consent with lowells

but please don't pay them anything

 

and comeback and tell us how you got on.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, you have given Lowells the opportunity to backtrack and correct ther peperwok so they can continue their claim against you whe it was really for someone else in the first place.

 

 

Please take this matter further by going for a set-aside of the judgement and then get Lwells claim not only chucked out of court but some form of restitution as well as they clearly have been misusing your data under the DPA.

 

Just agreeing something cosy with Lowells wont save your good name, they will now trash your credit report as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...