Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thats a good point. I've downloaded the policy but can't see anything about reporting accidents being mandatory. Unless I'm missing something?  insurancepolicy.PDF
    • I've never thought they were reliable enough and stories like this just confirm what I thought. Tesla owner says car in ‘full self-driving mode’ failed to detect a moving train WWW.AOL.CO.UK The close-shave in Camden, Ohio, was captured from multiple angles by the car’s cameras  
    • Hi,  I had a look through the credit agreement again, despite the signature looking legit I've noticed the below and wondered if they'd work as part of my defence, a)    The document headed ‘Your Personal Details’ has an office stamp which is unreadable. b)    On the above mentioned document under section ‘What to do next’ it states turn to agreement form on page 3 however 2 pages are provided. c)    The above mentioned document is unsigned & dated on behalf of Halifax PLC. d)    Two sets of documents headed ‘Credit Card Agreement Regulated By The Consumer Credit Act 1974’ was received containing dissimilar information. Under Parties to this agreement, both papers contain different name / address of the banking institute as well as Defendants address. This document is not on letter headed paper, the layouts are different, paragraph numbers differ as does the document content. Thanks again for any help.
    • Read your Insurance policy. It will say you have to report all accidents with a certain period of time. If you fail to report to your Insurers, if the third party does make a claim and your Insurers are contacted, you will he contacted by your Insurers stating you have failed to meet the terms of the Insurance contract. The Insurers still have obligation under Road Traffic Act to deal with third party claim, but when your Insurance is due for renewal, they may refuse to offer you further cover. Best to inform your Insurers, because the third party appears to be wanting someone to pay for car repair. Or worse they will try to say they suffered an injury. Yes you will see an increase in premium at renewal, but not reporting may mean you end up in a worse position.  
    • DRS are just a DCA ardens credit services or some rubbish like that pers id just ignore them. although you should be keeping your address up to date....   BUT   you should tell us exactly what is happening as BF has said. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claims Advisory Group


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2756 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Litigation Department have just rang me to say they're chasing me for £125 on money they claimed back for me on an RBS loan/credit card I had years ago (which they successfully won).

 

1. Are they allowed to still chase me for the money (refund was paid in 2010)?

 

2. Can they take me to court and get a CCJ against me on the strength of the above?

 

Hope somebody can help, cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See the rules about the six year limitation period 6yrs

Link to post
Share on other sites

BF is quite right... Have you kept paper work from the company?

Did they take "a cut" from the original claim? If so... They might be outta luck

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't get the original paperwork or if I had, I've absolutely no idea where it is now. Claims Advisory Group have definitely not previously taken their cut. In the phone call yesterday, they threatened legal action and obviously CCJs if the matter is taken to court. I don't want to go down that route for the sake of £125 but at the same time some of their threats and tone of voice made me think they can go whistle...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well The Statute Of Limitations would apply to any outstanding amount over 6 years.

I would for all benefits sake send a SAR to these guys and get all the info they have on you so you are prepared if they try something.

 

FWIW aswell - If you want to complain but feel you arent getting anywhere - Try;

 

[email protected] - Mr Jamie Alaise

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why bother if it statute barred>

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

may be beneficial all round as it will tell me exactly when they allegedly started acting on my behalf (confirm if it is 2010 or later), and in doing so will also tell me if this balance of £125 is indeed now Statute Barred.

 

 

The limitation period won't begin at the point they starting acting on your behalf but shortly after the commission became due.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the 'paperwork' sent through from the Claims Advisory Group,

which includes a letter from RBS dated 26th May 2010 and them refunding me my PPI claim within 28 days of the receipt of my acceptance signature.

 

 

Even by my calculations, that takes me over the 6 years statute barred threshold

 

 

- I'm free to tell the Claims Advisory Group in writing to forget about chasing the £125 wouldn't you agree?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id say yes at this point, They have had 6 years from payout to recognize their mistake and sadly, they missed their chance.

 

This in spite of their attempts over the years to chase me for the money?

 

The reason I ask was the last conversation was with someone from their 'legal' team saying they were going down the court/CCJ route next if I continued to ignore.

 

I've seen first hand a mate last week have to pay back almost £400 over non-payment of parking fines.

 

They'd left and left it (about 3/4 years) and the bailiffs were stood in her living room last week ready to walk out with the TV/hi-fi, etc...

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok lets get one thing clear here

 

Council parking fines are a CRIMINAL MATTER

civil debt is NOT!

so no bailiffs

despite what you might see/think/read.

 

doesn't matter a monkey's what Claims Advisory Group

say

write

or intimate

 

its your actions that can only reset the SB clock.

 

and you've not paid anything in 6yrs

and you've not written signing a letter stating this is my debt in 6yrs

 

so off and bugger Claims Advisory Group

 

phone conversations don't count

 

pers i'd be ignoring Claims Advisory Group

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
ok lets get one thing clear here

 

Council parking fines are a CRIMINAL MATTER

civil debt is NOT!

so no bailiffs

despite what you might see/think/read.

 

doesn't matter a monkey's what Claims Advisory Group

say

write

or intimate

 

its your actions that can only reset the SB clock.

 

and you've not paid anything in 6yrs

and you've not written signing a letter stating this is my debt in 6yrs

 

so off and bugger Claims Advisory Group

 

phone conversations don't count

 

pers i'd be ignoring Claims Advisory Group

 

Again, for clarity. Shall I continue to ignore the phone calls (had 3 so far this week) regarding the debt as it's been longer than 6 years? Or shall I write to them asking them to stop mithering me for a debt that is now statute barred? I don't want to go down the CCJ route either which they'd previously been citing - do you think they'd go down that route for a £125 debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes and seen them for much less than that aswell.

 

As advised, ignore them completely, unless they are dumb enough to issue a N1 claim form, if they do, pop back and we will deal with it.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does what mean what?

 

 

a claimform is a court claim ..

it comes from a COURT not the CMC

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if you see anything from Northampton Bulk CC Then get in contact with us ASAP.

 

More calls from CAG both to me (which I ignored) and now to where I work (they previously didn't have the number).

 

 

Can I give them a .. And get them to take the number of their records or are they allowed to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can

complain tell them not to use the works number

and then off to the ICO if they persist

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I've received a letter this morning from CAG headed Letter Before Action. In it, they've enclosed copies relevant to the debt of the letter of engagement and the invoice. They go on to say to ensure I need to show intention to repay the debt within the next 21 days before legal action including a possible CCJ is made against me - they also bring up that this will incur a further claim for interest at ...% and costs. They go on to say it is their intention to go down this round without further notice to myself. What should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan it up

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...