Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
    • please stop posting up unnecessary unnamed screenshot files  you've done it throughout your threads and we have to renamed them. RENAME THE FILE before you upload if its just text information like a defence or a claim history or a link to a previous post  type it here not by an unnamed screenshot attachment  . sorry NM but you've been here dealing with PPC claims since 2021 somehow you always manage to screw up.......or do totally the opposite of std repeated advice on 10'000 of PPC threads here you are your own worst enemy... dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Finance bought a debt with a court order on it


unicorn77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2572 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On the N245 it states 'a reduction in the instalment order'

I assume I would be marking this box since there has been no warrant requested?

 

When the paperwork came through from memory i'm certain it only stated that I was liable for the debt with no instalment stated,

it was a fair few years ago so maybe it was forthwith.:-(

 

Also if I enclosed an initial payment would i write a cheque to the creditor or court?

 

Sorry to be 'that guy' but I just made an interesting discovery.

 

I thought i'd check the land registry to make sure everything added up before sending the N245,

it's literally ready to post,

and it came back with this

 

(*.07.2015) Equitable charge created by a final charging order of the

County Court at * dated * July 2015 in favour of Bluestone Credit

Management Limited

 

it would appear that Cabot hasn't even had the CCJ/Charging Order assigned to them.

 

So does anyone have an idea on procedure?

 

Even if I sent the N245 to the county court with Cabots name on with a cheque made out to Cabot

 

i'd assume it'd either get returned by the court or get sent to then returned by Bluestone saying the debt is nothing to do with them?

 

Also if I pay Cabot then surely i'd be at risk of also paying Bluestone when the house is sold?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So not even in their name. ... :lol::lol::lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No:lol:

 

OK, after looking through this I might have found another way through.

Obviously you guys are the professionals and i'm the one that's picked things up as i've needed to find out.

 

 

looking at all the info I have

 

The CO isn't in Cabot's name, it's in Bluestones

 

Checking my Credit report Cabot don't even have this account on them,

it's Bluestone and is showing as £0 balance with a monthly payment made from 2009.

 

Could I put in to have the CO discharged?

then make Cabot do the whole prove it thing?

 

 

How would I do this?

or could it even be done?:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you cant get the Charging Order discharged.......lets get back to Cabot and Bluestone.

 

Obviously the Solicitor knows there is a charging order as it states so within their letter post #42..it also states their client (Cabot ) is aware.

 

With regards to it showing on your CRAs as Bluestone not Cabot..what date was the judgment ?

 

Andy

 

PS Hold with the N245 for now.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Cabot and their solicitor know there's a charging order, but all the court paperwork will go back to Bluestone who I assume would want nothing more to do with the debt and would consider it closed.Would it hurt putting a discharge of registered charge in to Blustone since It's free and I've already paid for the land registry info?

 

The CCJ was given March 2014, the account goes back to December 2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant discharge the CO..the judgment still stands...the fact that Cabot have not changed the Judgment name is their problem.

 

So until they do ignore the above letter as they cant execute the judgment until such time they change the name.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes from the court

 

 

don't sent that 245 off till we recommend mind

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So I know some of you were keen to see how much Cabot put into this £600 debt, and thanks to their persistence the answer arrived this morning. I made a condensed statement but including the fee they had to take off for losing the case they put £400 into it:lol:

123.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Small update...for the ones that forgot/never saw. Bluestone credit management got a CCJ in 2015, Cabot bought the debt they've threatened me with the CCJ even though the owner is still Bluestone.

 

This arrrived, the CCJ is still in Bluestones name

clarke2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

contact them and agree a repayment it may cost you a lot more if you do not, CCJ was originators they have purchased all rights/responsibilites to the CCJ sure others will same the same so see what others say???

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant discharge the CO..the judgment still stands...the fact that Cabot have not changed the Judgment name is their problem.

 

So until they do ignore the above letter as they cant execute the judgment until such time they change the name.

 

 

so this still stands then.

 

 

what are they upto

 

 

p'haps andy will comment.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I can only assume they don't know their client hasn't updated the court or they have no way of following procedure to update the court? The variation order is still sat here with the cheque in it to send

Link to post
Share on other sites

all cabot would have gotten is a few lines in a spreadsheet.

 

 

they filtered them for debts with a previous judgement

them thought to save money and by-passing the court

they'd change letterhead and see if they could spoof you and a few others in the same boat on the lemon bucket list they bought off bluestones with a few scary letter.

 

 

they were not the claimant on the judgement they cant enforce it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly my thoughts.

I'd rather not pay money to a company and have an outstanding CCJ for the original debt when i'm done paying.

 

I've contacted Bluestone about this and never got a reply so probably against advice I sent an N443 to the court to investigate.

 

Unless someones stupid enough to lose out on a 4 figure sum i'd be expecting it to be updated to Cabot so I can actually send in the variation order

 

Just to clarify I also told Cabot about my views on the debt, they replied saying they bought the debt therefore I owe them the money

Link to post
Share on other sites

You pay whatever was stated on the court order to who the court order said. If capquest want the money, then they would have to be substituted for the claimant.

 

Capquest are known liars, or rather the phone monkeys are, as they are trained and told to say and do whatever it takes to get the money. They certainly arent legally trained.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

N443? though that was to request a certificate of satisfaction?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not rang them, everything I do is communicated through letters,

it was actually the solicitors I corresponded with as the debt was given to them straight away to deal with.

 

I've no idea why they haven't had the name changed.

I can only assume they need to deal with paper work from Bluestones side which they can't be bothered with.

 

N443 is indeed a request for a certificate of satisfaction,

the court will contact the creditor.

 

To be honest based on the limbo situation and the selling a reselling of ccj debts i've read about that seem to lead nowhere something's got to be acted upon.

 

I'm attempting to pay the debt so it shows as satisfied which is why I wrote out the variation order a couple of months ago.

 

I have no interest in paying it just for the CCJ to be unsatisfied

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait and see if they are successful in making an application for AoE..if they are then the court has accepted that they are now the legal owners.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

After sending in the N443 to prompt some action today I got a letter back from the court.

 

 

After reading numerous threads on people stuck in a similar situation

I think we finally have some kind of resolution for people stuck in a similar situation,

and that seems to be if the new creditor is dumb enough to not update the courts,

then the new creditor can pay the debt for you:lol:

ccj.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...