Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA Group claimform - Old AA Lloyds Credit Card 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


Orchid47
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2669 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group (UK) Ltd

 

Date of issue – . 20th July 2016

 

What is the claim for –

 


  1. The Claimant claims the sum of £4500 for debt and interest.
  2. On 1/06/2004 the defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds for a CC under ref No. XXXXXX
  3. On 20/06/2010 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £3850.
  4. On 30/5/2014 the debt of £3805 was assigned to Aktiv Kapital Portfolio who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group (UK) on 21/12/14. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with a 136 Law of Property Act 1925

  5. and the Claimant Claims
    1. The sum of £3805
    2. Statutory interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per year from 30/05/2014 to 19/07/16 - xxxxx and thereafter at a daily rate of £1.09 until judgement or sooner payment
     

    What is the value of the claim? £4500

    Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Credit Card
     
    When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before 2007
     
    Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Aktiv Kapital Portfolio who assigned debt to PRA

    Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

    Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Don't think so
     
    Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Don't think so??

    Why did you cease payments? Lack of work
     
    What was the date of your last payment? Defaulted in 2010, but then was paying £1 for a few years, then ceased this about a year ago
     
    Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Don't think so

    Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? Yes I wrote to them in 2010, and offered them the £1 per month
     

    Ok, please can you help me with what to do next
    1. / I need to acknowledge the Claim Form - haven't done this yet and intend to defend all of the Claim????
     
    2. Who do I send off a CCA request to? as none of the above mentioned where who I originally had the Credit Card with?
     
    3. Am I to send off a CPR 31:14 to PRA?
     
    Back in 2009 I had instructed a company called "Credit Issues" to help me
    and they failed to obtain a copy of my CCA,
    I had huge problems with "Credit Issues" and sacked them in the end because they were all talk and no do.
     
    Your help and advice would be hugely appreciated with these Court Papers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

The Claimant claims the sum of £4500 for debt and interest. On 1/06/2004 the defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds for a CC under ref No. XXXXXX

 

.........

 

 

Ok, please can you help me with what to do next

 

2. Who do I send off a CCA request to? as none of the above mentioned where who I originally had the Credit Card with?

 

 

Looking at point 2. : was the original CC with Lloyds as the PofC states?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original CC was with The AA. Not sure where Lloyds comes into it as all I can see on the back of the CC statements is Card Services, Pitreavie Bus Park, Dunfermline. I thought this was a Bank of Scotland address???

Link to post
Share on other sites

do as you did before

ACK [AOS] the claim

defend all

 

 

get a CCA request running to the CLAIMANT

get a CPR 31:14 running to the sols.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread tidied and renamed.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AOS too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No who said that?

 

 

you do not miss you defence filing date regardless.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

33 days from date on claimform top right

whereby that date is ONE in the count of 33

 

 

I make that a sunday

so you need to file by 4pm the previous Friday [ie BEFORE the w/end]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean post it up here first for it to get checked?

not use the form and royal mail I take it ...just to be sure on your actions..dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

have had a dreadful week since my last post and missed the Friday 4pm deadline

- even though the 33 days are not up till Sunday.

Please tell me if I can send it in on line still?

 

I'm so stupid, but have had a nightmare this end

Link to post
Share on other sites

Called MCOL as cannot log in, tried calling them and message says this number (as below) is not in service

 

We are sorry, but your request has been rejected owing to one or more technical reasons. Please check your input and try again. If you continue to get this message then please contact the Money Claim helpdesk.

 

It can be contacted for support between 9:00am and 5:00pm, Monday to Friday on:

 

Tel: 0845 601 5935

 

Ive emailed them and attached a reference number for the Log in above

Link to post
Share on other sites

2nd poster this week to miss filing last Friday

you might be lucky

 

if you are

use post 74 here for the defence

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?467458-Pra-group-Claim-form-old-Mbna-Credit-card-help/page2

 

 

copy it back HERE FIRST MIND

 

 

and well check it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't miss it on purpose dx100uk,

 

I have just received an email back from them saying they have a problem with their phone lines

 

Telephone Systems: We are currently experiencing technical problems with our telephony system. When calling our helpdesk you will receive a ring tone rather than the usual answering options, but your call will be answered by an operative if you continue to hold on the line. We are sorry for any inconvenience and assure you we are working to fix this issue as a priority

Link to post
Share on other sites

phone line will be off now till Monday.

that's why

 

thats why we said try mcol

rather than email.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if mcol is having a hissy fit

try again in about an hour

quite usual for a Friday for it to be going wrong.

 

email is the alternative but do both if you can.

 

MCOL is only one way of responding to a claim.

.

If you are having problems logging in, or would prefer not to use MCOL,

you can fax, email or post your response to the Court instead.

If you send your response by e mail

please send it to [email protected] and ensure you quote “Claim response” and quote the claim number in the subject field.

.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx100uk I phoned half an hour before deadline of 5pm, and MCOL was also not in service. Ive an email from them with a reference number of the service interruption to quote

 

Just going to post defence now on here for some help to make sure its ok?

Thank you dx100uk in anticipation for your much needed help. The jargon baffles me :o(

 

dx100uk , andyorch , thank you for taking a look at this defence, and any help before submitting would be hugely appreciated

I'm a bit confused as the debt was assigned to one company originally who reassigned it to PRA

 

Particulars a/c no

Date

19/08/2016 Default balance £XXXXX + Interest

Post refri Cr – Nil

Total - £XXXX

 

Defence

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.The Claimant claims payment of the overdue default balance due from the Defendant under a contract between Defendant and the original lender Lloyds

 

2. This was assigned to the claimant on 21st December 2014 (This was originally assigned to another Debt Collector in June 2014, who later assigned it to this Claimant)

 

 

 


  1. The Claimant claims the sum of £4500 for debt and interest.
  2. On 1/06/2004 the defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds for a CC under ref No. XXXXXX
  3. On 20/06/2010 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £3850.
  4. On 30/5/2014 the debt of £3805 was assigned to Aktiv Kapital Portfolio who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group (UK) on 21/12/14. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with a 136 Law of Property Act 1925

  5. and the Claimant Claims
    1. The sum of £3805
    2. Statutory interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per year from 30/05/2014 to 19/07/16 - xxxxx and thereafter at a daily rate of £1.09 until judgement or sooner payment
     
    The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.
     
    1. Paragraph 1 is denied. The claimant remains in default of complying to my section 78 request dated 27th July 2016 and is therefore prevented from requesting any relief or request enforcement of the agreement pursuant to sec78 (6) (a) of the CCA1974.
     
    2 . Paragraph 1 is denied .I cannot ever recall receiving any Notice of Assignment from Lloyds or PRA Group (UK) Ltd or ever having being approached pre litigation with regards this alleged debt.
     
    It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:
     
    (a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and
    (b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and
    © show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;
     
    On receipt of this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a Section 78 consumer credit Agreement Act 1974 for copies of any documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. To date they have failed to comply to my section 78 request and remain in default and with regards to my CPR 31.14 request.
     
    As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.
     
    On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the Consumer Credit Agreement Act 1974.
     
    By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please use your [their] poc in red

and you need to copy and paste that excellent defence I pointed you too.

 

 

dunno where you got that above one from?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...