Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Do I have a right to ask for cash in lieu settlement for at fault car insurance claim


Extrovert
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2988 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Unfortunately, last sunday I had my first ever car accident and I accept that it was my fault.

 

My car sustained some damage on the front i.e. bonnet, bumper and atleast a headlight. I have claimed on my policy. The insurance company have arranged their car repair partners to pick up the car for repairs. I wonder if I can get advice for following questions please?.

 

1. How do I know if the insurance company will repair the car or write it off?

 

2. If the insurance company decides to repair the car, do I have the right to ask for the cash in lieu settlement? I would prefer cash in lieu settlement so either I can just sell my car and top up the settlement cash with my own money and get a new car. Alternatively, i can get it repaired at a lower cost and then keep the remainder of the settlement money for next years increased insurance premium.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Unfortunately, last sunday I had my first ever car accident and I accept that it was my fault.

 

My car sustained some damage on the front i.e. bonnet, bumper and atleast a headlight. I have claimed on my policy. The insurance company have arranged their car repair partners to pick up the car for repairs. I wonder if I can get advice for following questions please?.

 

1. How do I know if the insurance company will repair the car or write it off?

 

2. If the insurance company decides to repair the car, do I have the right to ask for the cash in lieu settlement? I would prefer cash in lieu settlement so either I can just sell my car and top up the settlement cash with my own money and get a new car. Alternatively, i can get it repaired at a lower cost and then keep the remainder of the settlement money for next years increased insurance premium.

 

Thanks

 

Car will be assessed for repair costs and if these are about 70% of the cars value then it could be classed as a write off. Wait for the Insurers to advise, but keep an eye on them, by chasing it up, as it is not unknown for cars to be taken to a salvage yard, with Insurers making up their minds it is a write off. The car is your property until you agree to write off and accept a settlement payment.

 

What some people do, is to get their own inspection, either getting car back or getting a mechanic to visit the car where it is. You might be able to get a cash settlement towards repairs, but you would need a formal estimate from a garage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Car will be assessed for repair costs and if these are about 70% of the cars value then it could be classed as a write off. Wait for the Insurers to advise, but keep an eye on them, by chasing it up, as it is not unknown for cars to be taken to a salvage yard, with Insurers making up their minds it is a write off. The car is your property until you agree to write off and accept a settlement payment.

 

What some people do, is to get their own inspection, either getting car back or getting a mechanic to visit the car where it is. You might be able to get a cash settlement towards repairs, but you would need a formal estimate from a garage.

 

Thank you for your response. Shall I just let the insurance company garage take the car, assess the damage and provide quotation before carrying out the repairs? Or shall I get a private quote before they take the car on next wednesday?

 

can insurance company insist me to get the car repaired instead of offering cash in lieu settlement in both of the options mentioned above? Can I say its my right to have cash in lieu settlement or is it their discretion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't make it sound like you are just after the cash. It might start sounding like a crash for cash and suddenly they start investigating.

 

The Insurers will follow a set procedure and you should ask them for contact details of where the car has been taken, so you can speak to someone at the repair centre. You would like the opportunity of seeing whether you can get the car repaired near to where you live, but you need to know the extent of damage to see what options might be available.

 

But heed my warning about not mentioning cash at this stage, as you will create suspicion about your claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eeek!!! I have already mentioned cash in lieu settlement to my insurance company in multiple calls. I understand it can raise suspicions but it wasn't a crash for cash and the only thing I am trying to do is get the best available option in my situation of course only if the best option is legal and within my rights.

 

I am not intrested in anything illegal regardless of the amount of money involved. I appreciate your warning and advice as further complication in the claims process can add to the stress I am already going through. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

extrovert, I hope you car is worth the added hassle subjecting it to a claim, the car must be your property and not on finance anywhere for you to consider any cash in lieu of repair, if the car is on finance legally you are not the owner of the car (depending on finance type)

 

they need to inspect the car to make there decision's, as mentioned above make sure you know where your car is at all time should you want to attempt to buy it back, front end damage can hide further damage (wish bone's, cross member's ,radiators, slam panel to name just a few) most of the time you can get your own car repaired using second hand part's a lot cheaper than the insurance estimates

Link to post
Share on other sites

extrovert, I hope you car is worth the added hassle subjecting it to a claim, the car must be your property and not on finance anywhere for you to consider any cash in lieu of repair, if the car is on finance legally you are not the owner of the car (depending on finance type)

 

they need to inspect the car to make there decision's, as mentioned above make sure you know where your car is at all time should you want to attempt to buy it back, front end damage can hide further damage (wish bone's, cross member's ,radiators, slam panel to name just a few) most of the time you can get your own car repaired using second hand part's a lot cheaper than the insurance estimates

 

Thank you for your response. They took the car away today and informed me that the car is not a write off and will be repaired.

 

I am still confused about my initial question that whether I am entitled to cash in lieu settlement or not. Can they insist on repairing the car and if they do can I go to the financial ombudsman to complain?

 

I just want to know what my rights are so if they refuse to offer cash in lieu settlement, is it worth fighting for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if you read your policy you will find it's up to your insurers how they deal with the claim. You can ask for cash instead (but be aware that it will likely be less than the estimated cost of the repairs since they won't pay the VAT element) but it's up to them if they agree.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response. They took the car away today and informed me that the car is not a write off and will be repaired.

 

I am still confused about my initial question that whether I am entitled to cash in lieu settlement or not. Can they insist on repairing the car and if they do can I go to the financial ombudsman to complain?

 

I just want to know what my rights are so if they refuse to offer cash in lieu settlement, is it worth fighting for?

 

As far as I am aware you are entitled to get the car repaired by who ever you wish, you may think bill's garage would do a better job than there repair centre, in this case I think you don't get the hire car and the job has to be sensibly priced (either the same or cheaper the the repair center)

As far as asking for cash instead, it is a tricky one, fingers maybe pointed and said you damaged your car on purpose for financial gain (crash for cash)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...