Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot asking for payment for LLOYDS TSB credit card debt.


scrivenger
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1929 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Andy - just received last transaction information. On the 15th April 2009 two transactions took place on the account. Both were payments made to the account, one was for £1 the other for £201 pounds. That was the last time the account was active I assume. They also said that the account was placed into recovery on the 28th October 2009.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Andy - just received last transaction information. On the 15th April 2009 two transactions took place on the account. Both were payments made to the account, one was for £1 the other for £201 pounds. That was the last time the account was active I assume. They also said that the account was placed into recovery on the 28th October 2009.

 

So if you made no payments after April 09, then the account would have gone into default in about June/July 09, so will be statute barred. With credit cards, it is usually about 2 months after a missed bill that the default is registered.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming they have issued a Default Notice UB......had a couple of cases were the Court accepted defaulting upto one year later was acceptable and the cause of action...madness.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming they have issued a Default Notice UB......had a couple of cases were the Court accepted defaulting upto one year later was acceptable and the cause of action...madness.

 

A case of examining the account t&c's,

asking for copy of default notice and

a copy of the creditors internal account processing manual.

 

 

All companies covered by FSA/FCA, have to have fully documented processes for accounts,

which shows how their staff should deal with customer accounts.

This is so that it is possible for auditors to check that the company is maintaining the financial standards expected under FCA handbook.

 

 

When you get audited, they check a load of random customer accounts and compare it with the process guides/maps.

 

Would suggest that the default a year later is an exceptional case or the creditor did not have to disclose the standard process model they followed to meet account terms, as well as regulators financial standards.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have 12+2 working days from the day you sent it.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received today 12th Jan a letter from Cabot dated 8th Jan.

 

 

QTE You recently sent us a payment by postal order,

unfortunately we were not able to cash this postal order because there was no payee filed out . UNQTE

 

 

Then

 

 

QTE When sending your cheque to us, please ensure the amount of payment is stated on the cheque UNQTE

 

 

I left the PO blank as suggested above but I had filled the amount in!

 

 

I imagine this is a stalling tactic by Cabot but

 

 

my question is does the clock still tick re the 12+2 days from the day I sent the CCA request

or has this letter negated that?

 

 

Thanks in anticipation..

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep std crap.

 

 

send it back

 

 

and no don't use a cheque or sign anything.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could write cabot on it

 

send another cca request

 

as you are not paying the 12+2 working days are immaterial really.

 

until/unless the produce an enforceable agreement

 

they cant demand anything

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Today, 23rd Jan, letter received from Cabot.. .......... 'We confirm that we do not hold all your information on file, therefore we have requested a copy of the Agreement and Statement of account from the original creditor and will forward to you upon receipt. The account is on hold whilst we await this information.'

 

How long do they have to provide this information?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesnt appear to be one, yet.

scrivenger - if it was placed in recovery oct 09 (that usually indicates a prior default), and no payment/acknowlegment since then, bar looks likely :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just sit back and wait for those at Cabot to say we will leave your account on hold as the original credit needs to find the agreement. When that arrives don't start letter tennis its counter productive. Their letter will state they have 40 days to comply not true...

 

 

Simply wait and keep ALL letters from Cabot. Then only respond to them within say 30 days between each letter. Then stay off of the phone unless you are recording it....

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Good Afternoon,

 

I'm after some assistance please with the following:-

 

I received today in the post a letter from CABOT regarding my account. It states that 'as we have not been able to come to a mutual arrangement to repay your account, Cabot Financial will be passing your account out to Ruthbridge Limited, a debt collection agency.'

 

My previous dealings with Cabot involved me sending an SB letter that was kindly supplied by yourselves. That was over 7 or 8 years ago now and I hadn't heard from them until today.

 

My question is should I send another SB letter to Ruthbridge or should I just ignore them?. I'm assuming Cabot have sold the debt on and that Ruthbridge will just use slimeball tactics to try and convince me that I still owe.

 

TIA

 

Scrivenger

Link to post
Share on other sites

which debt is this

the citi card

or

the Lloyds card

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged for history

 

cabot have not sold the debt anywhere

 

if you read the letter carefully

you'll see ruths are just another trading name/sol? and their client is cabot.

 

since you sent the old SB letter

the rules have change and the FCA conc rules have come into force

 

send cabot our new SB letter

in the debt collection section of our library

you should then hear nothing more

 

 

since

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, i'm very grateful for your advice. I will follow it and send a revised SB letter to CABOT. However I am unable to find any refereance in either letter to Ruthbridge being a solicitor. Grateful if you could show me where.

 

TIA

 

Scrivenger

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct just another cabot trading name

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

both?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...