Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks jk2054 - email now sent to OCMC requesting an in person hearing.
    • You can easily argue your case with no sign on the nearest parking sign
    • Same issue got a fine yesterday for parking in suspended bay which was ending at 6:30 yesterday, next thing I see a fine 15 minutes before it. The sign was obstructed 
    • Hi all, an update on the case as the deadline for filing the WS is tomorrow i.e., 14 days before the hearing date: 7th June. Evri have emailed their WS today to the court and to myself. Attached pdf of their WS - I have redacted personal information and left any redactions/highlights by Evri. In the main: The WS is signed by George Wood. Evri have stated the claim value that I am seeking to recover is £931.79 including £70 court fees, and am putting me to strict proof as to the value of the claim. Evri's have accepted that the parcel is lost but there is no contract between Evri and myself, and that the contract is with myself and Packlink They have provided a copy of the eBay Powered By Packlink Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) to support their argument the contractual relationship is between myself and Packlink, highlighting clause 3a, e, g of these T&Cs. They further highlight clause 14 of the T&Cs which states that Packlink's liability is limited to £25 unless enhanced compensation has been chosen. They have contacted Packlink who informed them that I had been in contact with Packlink and raised a claim with Packlink and the claim had been paid accordingly i.e., £25 in line with the T&Cs and the compensated postage costs of £4.82. They believe this is clear evidence that my contract is with Packlink and should therefore cease the claim against Evri. Evri also cite Clause 23 of the pre-exiting commercial agreement between the Defendant and Packlink, which states:  ‘Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 A person who is not a party to this Agreement shall have no rights under the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 to rely upon or enforce any term of this Agreement provided that this does not affect any right or remedy of the third party which exists or is available apart from that Act.’ This means that the Claimant cannot enforce third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and instead should cease this claim and raise a dispute with the correct party.   Having read Evri's WS and considered the main points above, I have made these observations: Evri have not seen/read my WS (sent by post and by email) as they would have recognised the claim value is over £1000 as it includes court fees, trial fees, postage costs and interests, and there is a complete breakdown of the different costs and evidence. Evri accepts the parcel is lost after it entered their delivery network - again, this is in my WS and is not an issue in dispute. Evri mentions the £25 and £4.82 paid by Packlink - Again, had they read the WS, they would have realised this is not an issue in dispute. Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency   This supports the view that once a user (i.e, myself) selects a transport agency (i.e Evri) that best suits the user's needs, the user (i.e, myself) enters into a contract with the chosen transport agency (i.e, myself). Therefore, under the T&Cs, there is a contract between myself and Evri. Evri cites their pre-existing agreement with Packlink and that I cannot enforce 3rd party rights under the 1999 Act. Evri has not provided a copy of this contract, and furthermore, my point above explains that the T&Cs clearly explains I have entered into a contract when i chose Evri to deliver my parcel.  As explained in my WS, i am the non-gratuitous beneficiary as my payment for Evri's delivery service through Packlink is the sole reason for the principal contract coming into existence. Clearly Evri have not read by WS as the above is all clearly explained in there.   I am going to respond to Evri's email by stating that I have already sent my WS to them by post/email and attach the email that sent on the weekend to them containing my WS. However, before i do that, If there is anything additional I should further add to the email, please do let me know. Thanks. Evri Witness Statement Redacted v1 compressed.pdf
    • Thank you. I will get on to the SAR request. I am not sure now who the DCA are - I have a feeling it might be the ACI group but will try to pull back the letter they wrote from her to see and update with that once I have it. She queried it initially with 118 118 when she received the default notice I think. Thanks again - your help and support is much appreciated and I will talk to her about stopping her payments at the weekend.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

small claim against a "sole trader" caravan repairer ***Paid in Full***


marka1980
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2898 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm posting on my dad's behalf, who in May this year had his caravan repaired by a local repairer.

 

The repairer is just a sole trader, and not a limited company.

On his website he says that all repairs he does he gives 12 month warranties on.

Although, on my dad's paperwork it just says "warranty, as dated above"..

 

A few weeks ago he had a damp test done, and it showed that water was still getting in, due to not being sealed properly,

and the panels replaced in May would need replacing again.

The readings were around 30%..

 

My dad contacted the repairer and told him this, but he never came round to view the caravan when he promised.

 

 

Ever since then my dad has had his calls ignored, or when he answered and knew it was my dad, he just hung up.

He has also visited his unit in person, and he wasn't there but people tell him he had been working earlier in the week.

If he had called round he could have done his own checks.

 

My dad is due to get another repair company to quote on getting the work done, and he will also get his damp report in writing done by his engineer.

 

He spoke to caravan & camping club legal team who have advised him to send a "letter before action" and give him 14 days in which to respond.

I am due to write the letter at the weekend and think that I we will have to give him until early in January to respond because of the Christmas break.

 

Would it be best to ask for whole amount to be refunded, or just ask the rogue repairer to pay whatever it costs to put it right?

I will of course attach copies of the quotation, and also the damp report.

I shall include a copy of the invoice to my dad when the repair was done in May.

 

I'm not sure what rule he has breached by not honouring his warranty, so if you could tell me I would appreciate it.

 

I've also asked for advice on a caravan & camping forum and was advised to post here as you could help more with the legal side.

 

 

Thanks for reading. Apologies for the long-winded post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You're quite right that the Christmas break gets in the way. I would suggest that you hold off sending the letter before action until after Christmas.

In the meantime, I would make sure that I knew all about the small claims action in the County Court by reading all the materials that we have on this website. I will also make sure that I knew exactly where the repairer lives and whether or not he owns his own home so that when you win – as you probably will on the facts you have given here – you will then be able to enforce a judgement fairly easily.

 

I think that if you write a letter before action now and then there is the intervening break, the whole question of deadlines and so forth will become rather blurred and neither you nor he will understand really when acknowledgements have to be filed and defences have to be filed et cetera.

 

I don't see any urgency at the moment. Issue the claim after Christmas then you can have a clear run and react all the deadlines promptly

 

On the matter of what a claim for, you will be best off getting quotes to put his poor work into proper conditions so that there is a proper repair.

 

If you haven't done this yet then you are not ready to issue proceedings anyway. You should get too independent quotes for the work make sure they are fully detailed. Send them to the repairer and require that he pays the cheaper of the two. You can include the estimates in your letter before action and warn him that if he does not comply with your request then you will sue him.

 

In terms of what rule has he broken, because it has given a 12 month warranty, he has committed a simple breach of contract based on the promise he made. Furthermore, even without his express warranty the work would have had to have been done to a satisfactory standard and he will have breached the terms implied by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. Had the contract been agreed after 1 October this year, then the 1982 act wouldn't apply and you would be dealing with the Consumer Rights Act

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks very much for the quick reply.

 

I see what you mean about waiting until the New Year for sending the letter before action. I will put that to my dad and see if he agrees.

 

I have read about the small claims court on this site as you advised.

 

I do know the repairer's address. Is it by looking on the land registry website that I find out who owns the property?

 

Thanks again

Mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Thanks very much for that link Bazooka!! £19.95 seemed a little steep for a copy of the title deeds.

 

 

I did a little more searching and found I could get the deeds for £3..It was the gov.uk site..

 

 

I'm sure it was a mistake...

 

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

 

I've wrote the letter now. I just have to wait a few days for written quotes to arrive.

 

 

My dad has now said he would like to post it to him before Christmas now.

 

 

Is there any chance someone willing to have a look at what I've typed up would message me their email address so I could send it to them please?

 

 

Thanks

Mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can post up a suitably redacted copy of it on here, that way then you get the best advice rather than one individuals.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have copied and pasted the body of the letter..

Thanks Bazooka boo.

Letter before action

 

Re: Caravan damp repair

 

Dear ******

 

I write further to our telephone conversation on Friday 27th November 2015.It was on this date that i explained to you that my damp report readings on the area you carried out repairs indicated that water ingress and damp were showing signs of occurring once again.I have attached the damp report carried out by my service engineer for your attention.

 

You failed to visit my home, as you promised, to investigate my findings with your repair on Tuesday 1st December 2015.I have made several attempts to contact you by telephone on various phone numbers that are shown your website, and on display outside your work premises, and you have either ignored my calls, or failed to return my calls.I have also visited your premises on three separate occasions, and you weren’t there. Due to the seriousness of my caravan’s deterioration, i am left with no other alternative but to write to you.

 

On your completion of the repair, and, as also stated on your website, you provided me with a twelve month warranty, and by failing to respond to my calls, you are in breach of contract based on the promise that you made. Furthermore, the work has been proved to be done to an unsatisfactory standard and you are in breach of the terms implied by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.I have enclosed a copy of my receipt for the work you carried out in May 2015.

 

As stated on your own website, damp in a caravan will only get worse, and i have made contact with third party repairers to rectify your poor standard of work. You will find copies of the quotes attached to this letter, and i seek reimbursement from you in full for the cost of bringing your poor work to a proper standard.

 

Due to the urgency of the repair, and taking into account the upcoming Christmas holiday break, i would like a response from yourself, in writing, no later than Friday 8th January 2016.Should I not receive a response from you in this time frame, then i anticipate that court action will be commenced with no further reference to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reads very good IMO, although I would possibly change the last para to something along the lines of, ''Should I fail to receive a satisfactory response by Friday 8th Jan 2016, I will commence with the repairs to rectify your poor workmanship and I shall invoice you for the cost, if I fail to receive any communication from you regarding the invoice I will seek legal remedy via the small claims track whereby the cost will increase.

I look forward to your timely response,

Regards......''

 

Or something similar....I would say that your perogative would be to get the caravan repaired to a good standard then chase him for the money.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one further thought.

 

 

My dad paid upwards of £2000 for the cost of the repairs. Quotations to put the work right are bound to be of that amount, or slightly higher again from other repairers.

 

 

Is there anyway of wording something that he pays the quote and we then have the money to get the repair done.

 

 

I don't think my dad is in the position to pay £2000 again!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get three separate quotes for the repair and send them with your letter.

 

Inform them that if they fail to respond, then you will have the work carried out, and the invoice will be sent to them, failure to pay the invoice will result in a claim being made via the small claims track, including interests and costs.

 

AFAIK, there is no way of forcing them to pay for the repairs prior to them being carried out, however, remember what the objective is, which is to get them to carry out the repairs satisfactorily, hopefully they will correct the repairs themselves, legal action is when you have no other option.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see what you are saying, but, we now don't trust the guy with our caravan as he has made no attempt at all to contact us, and not returned our calls. My dad actually spoke to him once recently, and as soon as he realised it was my dad, he hung up. All confidence in his work has been lost.

 

 

His work has been proven to be shoddy by other repairers, and my service engineer, and we don't want him to work on ours again for fear he might make the problem worse, or even damage it out of spite.

 

 

Getting people around to quote for free on caravans is difficult. My dad has already spent 2hrs just taking it 2 miles away from his home for a quote. The amount of work involved in hitching up, unhitching, closing cupboard doors etc..really takes a lot of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK then, in that case as he has failed to communicate and proved to be incompetent, get the quotes, send them to him, demand that he respond to you within a certain time limit, state a date a date by which you expect a response, failure of which you will go ahead and have the work carried out.

 

If he fails to pay for the repairs then you will escalate the matter to the small claims, where costs and interest will be added.

  • Confused 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb:

 

You're welcome, it's a shame it comes to this, all you want is for the work to be carried out to a satisfactory standard, and for them to honour the 12 month warranty.

 

Once you have the quotes, copy them, send them to him, obtain proof of posting if you're going to send them, OR take them to his premises by hand, and get someone to sign for them, then once he fails to respond by the date you give him, have the work carried out, and send him the invoice.

 

Once he fails to respond to the invoice, then send a LBA (letter before action) giving him a further 7 days to respond, this MUST be sent via recorded delivery, then once he fails to respond to that, start the small claims track....

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I now have for now.. I'll hold sending the letter before action as you say..

Dear ******

I write further to our telephone conversation on Friday 27th November 2015. It was on this date that i explained to you that my damp report readings on the area you carried out repairs indicated that water ingress and damp were showing signs of occurring once again. I have attached the damp report carried out by my service engineer for your attention.

You failed to visit my home, as you promised, to investigate my findings with your repair on Tuesday 1st December 2015. I have made several attempts to contact you by telephone on various phone numbers that are shown your website, and on display outside your work premises, and you have either ignored my calls, or failed to return my calls. I have also visited your premises on three separate occasions, and you weren’t there. Due to the seriousness of my caravan’s deterioration, i am left with no other alternative but to write to you.

On your completion of the repair, and, as also stated on your website, you provided me with a twelve month warranty, and by failing to respond to my calls, you are in breach of contract based on the promise that you made. Furthermore, the work has been proved to be done to an unsatisfactory standard and you are in breach of the terms implied by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. I have enclosed a copy of the invoice for the work you carried out in May 2015.

As stated on your own website, damp in a caravan will only get worse, and i have made contact with third party repairers to rectify your poor standard of work. You will find copies of the quotes attached to this letter.

Should I fail to receive a satisfactory response from you by Friday 8th January 2016, i will commence with repairs to rectify your poor workmanship, and i shall invoice you for the cost. If i then fail to receive any communication from you regarding the invoice, i will seek legal remedy via the small claims court, whereby the costs and interest will be added.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one further point. As this is probably going to drag at least until March next year, is it possible for him to just start up another business using a different name to avoid action.

 

 

I'll also get a proof of posting for the copy I send to his home address..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, not sure??

 

You can check on companies house website whether he has a habit of doing as you suggested, but I would strongly doubt that he would change company names to avoid covering the repairs to one caravan, although TS might know if there are any more complaints regarding his workmanship?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is a sole trader as per #1 so address to him personally as he is liable

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would address it as:

 

Fred Bloggs t/a blah blah caravans

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all.

 

 

I have an update but not a great one.

 

 

The repairer has not replied to any letters. We also asked the "Consumer Ombudsman" to help, but he declined their intervention. I know that he was not part of their scheme, but trading standards thought it a good idea to involve them.

 

 

The caravan has now got in a worse state, and my dad has no spare cash to correct the work before being refunded of the poor work done. Is there anyway that we could use the "Money claim online" service to recover the monies paid, or would they only award costs if we had repairs carried out.

 

 

My dad has legal cover with his caravan insurance. He is going to contact them tomorrow. Does anyone know if they will advise and take the case on for free without taking a penny of the sums awarded?

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK, getting the work done and then billing this chap is a better approach, but if your father doesn't have the funds available, then the same process should be applied.

 

Obtain three estimates for the repair, then make a claim against the individual.company for the cost of the repairs, then once/if you are successful you will have the funds to carry out the necessary repairs.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...