Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
    • Hi everyone, I received a charge certificate with a charge of £165  in April 2022 however I never received a PCN and NTO before that. I responded by requesting original PCN reissued in the hope of getting discounted rate which was refused however I was offered to pay £110. I received a Order of Recovery in May 2023 and submitted a witness statement on time by email to get the original PCN re-issued. I received a Notice of Enforcement in February 2024 so I contacted TEC that I had submitted TE9 on time and they advised me to submit a late witness statement and TE7. I did as advised and also attached the original email and witness statement as proof to show that I had submitted my witness statement on time. The council disputed my late witness statement by saying that I likely received the PCN and that I did not submit a valid late witness statement without specifying why it's not valid. The court refused my late witness statement without giving any reasoning behind their decision (so much for the transparency). This is really outrageous as I did attach the proof of submitting the witness statement on time and it seems like the court just decided without looking at the case files. Can someone please advise me what should I do now? Any help is appreciated. I have attached all the documents below.     Documents.pdf
    • Will the real criminals please stand   Biden 🤣GUILTY on all counts    Come September remember Americans don’t like tax dodgers 🤣
    • You of course ignore the fact that Farage actually helped raise £100,000 so that WW11 Veterans could actually attend the celebrations    Meanwhile oh to be in France 🤣  
    • Damn!  Wikipedia is out of date. Good idea though to see if one of the shops can give you the landowner's details.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA appeal


jason2723637
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi forum for now got few quick queries I m appealing a ESA not found unfit for work after an ATOS assessment in the letter says to send the form to and address which for the HMCTS is a PO Box I understand you can send special delivery post (next day guaranteed) to a PO box right and this should be fine sending my appeal form to the tribunal service this way?

 

 

also the PDF form is editable ie can type in it on the computer and fill it in that way so I could do it that way then just print out and sign/date it... beats my handwriting anyway but it says on the form to write in black and in BLOCK capitals is this significant don't want em sending it back. thanks for any info

 

thanks

 

PS - also no phone number to contact them or an email contact on the HMCTS website ???

Edited by jason2723637
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi forum for now got few quick queries I m appealing a ESA not found unfit for work after an ATOS assessment in the letter says to send the form to and address which for the HMCTS is a PO Box I understand you can send special delivery post (next day guaranteed) to a PO box right and this should be fine sending my appeal form to the tribunal service this way?

 

 

also the PDF form is editable ie can type in it on the computer and fill it in that way so I could do it that way then just print out and sign/date it... beats my handwriting anyway but it says on the form to write in black and in BLOCK capitals is this significant don't want em sending it back. thanks for any info

 

thanks

 

PS - also no phone number to contact them or an email contact on the HMCTS website ???

 

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

Have you asked for a mandatory consideration of the decision? You need to do that before you appeal via HMCTS.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will find sending a Special Delivery to a PO Box address will be non applicable unlike a recorded delivery.

 

The reason for this is that the special delivery is for a guaranteed next day delivery service on a signature. Believe it or not come companies, especially magazine competitions leave it up to 2 weeks before collecting the mail

Link to post
Share on other sites

ty for the reply obiter anyone know the number to contact HMCTS or have they got one at first contact? so I can find out if special delivery better or not or is non applicable and recorded delivery you mean the one that costs less but still needs a signature thing is it still may get there first class ie next day so no difference if thought that way...??

 

 

also thing about the special or recorded delivery is just so I know they got the appeal form via post and there is some sorta proof of them getting it....as I heard of one story of another person where the tribunal said they never got it although it was sent thru normal post...but it prob no biggie to just send it via normal post?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, once you have sent you application to HMCTS They will normally accept you reasons for appealing, once they have processed this they will notify you and the DWP of this, via the post to us appellants , not sure if the same for dwp

Once the DWP have this on their systems, they can then re start the ESA claim paid at the pre assessment rate until a decision is reached by the tribunal, but you will need Fit /sick notes that cover this period, So once you have heard back from HMCTS acknowledging your appeal get a fit note if you need one, and call the DWP . it can sometimes take them several days before their systems are updated ,So ring them frequently to see if it's showing on theirs systems , once it is they can then re open the claim and on receipt of a fit note will start paying you esa again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

im at this stage of the appeals process I got a letter form HMCTS saying my ESA appeal has been accepted meaning it will be a oral hearing etc. Not a letter with the actual date. Prior to this I first got a letter from them saying they received my appeal and then few weeks later from DWP with a bundle of relevant documents.

 

thing is on this letter it says in bold-

 

"It is important you send us any further evidence that you wish the Tribunal to consider now. This evidence will be shared with the other party. Do not wait until you are notified of the date of your hearing, or until the hearing date itself."

 

my understanding was that its possibly an option to either send or take medical evidence in my case mostly a letter from my GP and couple of other sources to the hearing or send it prior is this correct or is the above quote from the letter significant and others who have gone down the appeals route remember getting this as a norm in their letter/correspondence from HMCTS?

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok but it doesn't on that letter just says what I quoted above do you mean 7 days in advance of the oral tribunal hearing? In that case I wonder why it says "It is important you send us any further evidence that you wish the Tribunal to consider now. This evidence will be shared with the other party. Do not wait until you are notified of the date of your hearing, or until the hearing date itself."

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok but it doesn't on that letter just says what I quoted above do you mean 7 days in advance of the oral tribunal hearing? In that case I wonder why it says "It is important you send us any further evidence that you wish the Tribunal to consider now. This evidence will be shared with the other party. Do not wait until you are notified of the date of your hearing, or until the hearing date itself."

 

If it says to send it now and you have the evidence available, then I would send it now.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you send the evidence when you have it. You want the panel to have time to read the evidence, it will help your appeal.

 

Keep copies of anything you send, for your own records. I would keep originals, unless their letter says otherwise.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you send further evidence to HMCTS is is also copied to the DWP who can, in theory, alter their decision at anytime , however, I have no idea if this happens in practice.

 

When you go to the Tribunal I would make sure that you have copies of all the evidence you have sent in as well as what you want them to discuss. It has been a few years since I went to an ESA Tribunal but I focused my argument on the descriptors

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...