Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pointless Aviva cover


Raine82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3135 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am writing this on behalf of my other half who is currently laid up and immobile due to a non fault accident.

 

He was stationary on the fast lane of the motorway on Monday when another motorist drove into the back of him at 55-65mph (according to police and auto repair examiners). The other driver admitted fault straight away to my other half, the police and to his insurance company. My other half was then taken to hospital from the scene of the accident by ambulance on a spinal board due to pain in his leg, back and neck.

 

He is the only driver named on his insurance policy.

 

I tried to contact Aviva in order to inform them and to get the car recovered, they weren't interested in talking to me or the fact that he had been involved in an accident and been taken to hospital. By the time I'd been able to talk to someone from Aviva the highways agency had recovered his vehicle themselves and so Aviva just told me that my other half must contact them.

 

The following morning, once released from hospital, my other half phoned Aviva. They asked what had happened and where the car was, and said that they would arrange for the car to be collected and taken to be assessed.

 

My other half then had a call from the repairer to ask when he would be taking the car to them! A car that we told Aviva was NOT drivable and even if it was my other half unable to drive it due to injuries sustained in the accident!

 

Today is Friday, WE HAVE HEARD NOTHING FROM AVIVA SINCE TUES AM! No letters, phonecalls, emails etc etc.

 

Aviva never asked if anyone involved in the collision were injured when boths parties were taken into hospital by ambulance.

 

We have had to call the assessor only to find that the car has been deemed a total loss and is beyond all repair.

 

We have then had a call from the valuer to negotiate a price for the vehicle.

 

WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE 'FULLY COMPREHENSIVE' cover offered by aviva?

 

He is unable to work, is not getting wages while he is off. I am having to take care of him during his recovery. He's left with no car (not that he can drive). And Aviva don't seem to care less.

 

I have had experience of an accident similar to this in the past and my experience with my insurer AA was FAR superior, with me not having to do a thing, as well as being informed on what was going on every step of the way via telephone AND letter.

 

Why are Aviva unable to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and we've just called the 8am-8pm number on the website only to find that they're closed.

 

Spoke to 'John' on the chat facility who's given us another number...that one is closed too

 

Helpful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because they are a big company, not offering a decent personal service.

 

There are 2 elements

 

1) Aviva dealng with the write off claim paying market value

 

2) legal claim against the at fault third party driver for uninsured losses e.g personal injury, loss of wages, policy excess, other costs incurred. Aviva won't necessarily help with this legal claim, unless your husband took out legal expenses cover. If there is no legal cover, them approach a Solicitors that handles accident claims. Be careful, if they offer an expensive hire car, as sometimes third party insurers challenge costs, potentially leaving you with a contribution to pay. You will see accident management Solicitors online offering hire cars on a credit hire basis, as they look to make money from the third parties insurers.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful with the market value. They will try to offer less than bottom book value,mwhen it should be the market value to buy a replacement. So check Glass.co.uk or Parkers and local garages to see what the current value is.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mention not getting wages. Is he self employed ? If there is no money coming in, the at fault third parties Insurers may be willing to pay some money as an interim payment, if evidence is sent to them, on the basis that the rest needs to be negotiated. Sometimes the third parties insurers are more helpful.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately, we checked the values of the car and have ended up with an offer that we are willing to accept.

 

Aviva told my other half that he wouldn't get a courtesy car and forwarded him on to Enterprise as apparently in certain circumstances they are willing to hire cars out and bill the other party. We bypassed this as he is unable to drive due to his injuries anyway, so it would not be used and just taking up space, time and cost for nothing.

 

This seems odd to me as twice I've made non fault claims and have always been given a like for like car automatically within 24hrs of being off the road, whilst mine was being repaired/assessed.

 

So does it purely come down to 'you get what you pay for' rather than 'fully comprehensive' having the same meaning across the board?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately, we checked the values of the car and have ended up with an offer that we are willing to accept.

 

Aviva told my other half that he wouldn't get a courtesy car and forwarded him on to Enterprise as apparently in certain circumstances they are willing to hire cars out and bill the other party. We bypassed this as he is unable to drive due to his injuries anyway, so it would not be used and just taking up space, time and cost for nothing.

 

This seems odd to me as twice I've made non fault claims and have always been given a like for like car automatically within 24hrs of being off the road, whilst mine was being repaired/assessed.

 

So does it purely come down to 'you get what you pay for' rather than 'fully comprehensive' having the same meaning across the board?

 

It varies in terms of policy cover and what claims service they offer. Some Insurers don't handle their own claims and use an outsourced company.

 

If the third parties insurers are willing to deal directly, as they know they are at fault, it may be easier. Solicitors who specialise in personal injuries will have knowledge that will help, but they are allowed to keep up to 25% to cover their costs. You have to be careful, as there may be ongoing issues with the injuries and therefore there needs to be a full medical assessment. Only once there has been such an assessment, would this start being looked into. But as i said the third parties insurers might help deal with some current costs.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Aviva won't pursue the injury claim, ask OH if he is in a trade union. Most will provide access to legal services and they may be able to assist.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support
I am writing this on behalf of my other half who is currently laid up and immobile due to a non fault accident.

 

He was stationary on the fast lane of the motorway on Monday when another motorist drove into the back of him at 55-65mph (according to police and auto repair examiners). The other driver admitted fault straight away to my other half, the police and to his insurance company. My other half was then taken to hospital from the scene of the accident by ambulance on a spinal board due to pain in his leg, back and neck.

 

He is the only driver named on his insurance policy.

 

I tried to contact Aviva in order to inform them and to get the car recovered, they weren't interested in talking to me or the fact that he had been involved in an accident and been taken to hospital. By the time I'd been able to talk to someone from Aviva the highways agency had recovered his vehicle themselves and so Aviva just told me that my other half must contact them.

 

The following morning, once released from hospital, my other half phoned Aviva. They asked what had happened and where the car was, and said that they would arrange for the car to be collected and taken to be assessed.

 

My other half then had a call from the repairer to ask when he would be taking the car to them! A car that we told Aviva was NOT drivable and even if it was my other half unable to drive it due to injuries sustained in the accident!

 

Today is Friday, WE HAVE HEARD NOTHING FROM AVIVA SINCE TUES AM! No letters, phonecalls, emails etc etc.

 

Aviva never asked if anyone involved in the collision were injured when boths parties were taken into hospital by ambulance.

 

We have had to call the assessor only to find that the car has been deemed a total loss and is beyond all repair.

 

We have then had a call from the valuer to negotiate a price for the vehicle.

 

WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE 'FULLY COMPREHENSIVE' cover offered by aviva?

 

He is unable to work, is not getting wages while he is off. I am having to take care of him during his recovery. He's left with no car (not that he can drive). And Aviva don't seem to care less.

 

I have had experience of an accident similar to this in the past and my experience with my insurer AA was FAR superior, with me not having to do a thing, as well as being informed on what was going on every step of the way via telephone AND letter.

 

Why are Aviva unable to do this?

 

 

Hi Raine82,

 

I'm very sorry to read about what's happened and can completely understand why you are both frustrated. We appreciate that claims can be a stressful time and try to alleviate as much stress as possible; I'm sorry that this has not happened in this instance.

 

If you haven't done so already, please feel free to contact us directly at [email protected] with the policy holders:

 

~ Full name

~ Date of birth

~ Post code

~ Policy number

~ Your CAG username (so that we can link the posts)

 

Once we receive these details, we'll get in touch with our claims team and ask them to contact you directly to hopefully help resolve things.

 

Thanks

 

Nicki

Aviva Online Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately, we checked the values of the car and have ended up with an offer that we are willing to accept.

 

Aviva told my other half that he wouldn't get a courtesy car and forwarded him on to Enterprise as apparently in certain circumstances they are willing to hire cars out and bill the other party. We bypassed this as he is unable to drive due to his injuries anyway, so it would not be used and just taking up space, time and cost for nothing.

 

This seems odd to me as twice I've made non fault claims and have always been given a like for like car automatically within 24hrs of being off the road, whilst mine was being repaired/assessed.

 

So does it purely come down to 'you get what you pay for' rather than 'fully comprehensive' having the same meaning across the board?

 

As your other half is the only driver covered to drive the damaged vehicle and he's currently unable to drive, it would be difficult justifying to the other Insurers that they should pay for a hire vehicle at inflated cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...