Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Alcholol addiction fills the goverments coffers is it not time to allow other sunbstances the same right


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

About 40 of those 50 points can be attributed to someone who smokes cannabis and is off there head.

 

you dont need to smoke cannabis. All you need is the THC turned into a pill but without the affects of getting high...

 

Strangely enough tho is people who smoke illegally dont want this!!!!

 

Its just a ploy for druggies to get off there t##ts legally.

 

I'm all for research and there I compelling evidence that THC has a lot of medical uses.

 

So put it in a pill form.

 

Why not allow others the right to choose how they take Cannabis ? is it a plant, it grows naturally. Cannabis=zero deaths far safe than most foods we eat. Lets ban eating and take that in pill form to stop all the deaths each year from choking. Your argument has no foundation, have a spliff and chill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

See post above

And I must Sa you've done a wonderful job in just proving one of my statements.

I see the effects of drug use everyday, and whilst on the whole its not a problem, just like alcohol it can be a problem for some. A life changing problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And as for deaths which you say zero, a quick google search reveals hundreds. Here is one.

 

On 30 January 2014, the British tabloid Daily Mail published an article with the following liberally capitalized and attention-grabbing headline: Devout Christian Mother-of-Three, 31, Becomes First Woman in Britain to DIE from Cannabis Poisoning After Smoking a Joint in Bed to Help Her Sleep.

 

Based on the testimony of the pathologist who performed an autopsy on a 31-year-old woman named Gemma Moss, who was found dead next to a half-smoked marijuana joint, the Mail concluded that she “died directly from cannabis poisoning”:

 

 

A young mother of three died after she was poisoned by the cannabis she smoked to help her get to sleep. Gemma Moss, 31, was killed by the level of the drug in her blood, an inquest heard. The regular churchgoer, who was found dead in her bedroom, is thought to be the first woman in Britain known to have died directly from cannabis poisoning.

 

Her death was caused by cannabis toxicity, and a coroner recorded a verdict of death by cannabis abuse.The inquest was told that Miss Moss smoked half a joint a night to help her sleep

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are son negitive points

 

Loss of sense of personal identity

Lowered reaction time

Increased heart rate (risk of heart attack)

Increased risk of stroke

Problems with coordination (impairing safe driving or playing sports)

Sexual problems (for males)

Up to seven times more likely to contract sexually transmitted infections

than non-users (for females) 22,32 & 33

 

LONG-TERM EFFECTS

Decline in IQ (up to 8 points if prolonged use started in adolescent age)

Poor school performance and higher chance of dropping out

Impaired thinking and ability to learn and perform complex tasks

Lower life satisfaction

Addiction (about 9% of adults and 17% of people who started smoking as teens)

Potential development of opiate abuse

Relationship problems, intimate partner violence

Antisocial behavior including stealing money or lying

Financial difficulties

Increased welfare dependence

Greater chances of being unemployed or not getting good jobs.33

 

 

Source

https://www.drugfreeworld.org/drugfacts/marijuana/short-and-long-term-effects.html

 

Not sure if you aware but the source you cite is proudly sponsored by the Church of Scientology and Scientologists . Are you a Scientologist by chance? they are the masters of fud and you been fooled I am sorry to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which bit of the coroners report did u miss?

I quote

Her death was caused by cannabis toxicity, and a coroner recorded a verdict of death by cannabis abuse.

 

From the link you posted that checks facts !

 

 

 

While higher potency of marijuana would change that math a bit, it would not change it enough for that amount of combustion and inhalation to be possible. A 2011 report on drug abuse from the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) states that there had been (at least at that time), zero documented cases of fatal overdoses from cannabis. If cannabis killed Gemma Moss, it would had to have done so through a mechanism other than direct toxicity.
Link to post
Share on other sites

It just goes to further support the argument of more research into the benefits of THC...

But I'm not having druggies n pot heads all of a sudden claiming illnesses to have a medical cards allowng themselves to get stoned.

 

Put into a form where you dont get high but reap the benefits that are obviously there.

MS sufferers for example

 

The coroner recorded that verdict and it stands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It just goes to further support the argument of more research into the benefits of THC...

But I'm not having druggies n pot heads all of a sudden claiming illnesses to have a medical cards allowng themselves to get stoned.

 

Put into a form where you dont get high but reap the benefits that are obviously there.

MS sufferers for example

druggies , pot heads ? your language is insulting to everyone who takes cannabis and generally the position most take when cornered in the debate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have consumed cannabis daily recreationally and for health for 40 years it not only cures most ailments it also prevents them.

 

 

A medicine makes you healthy and happy, Cannabis do both remarkably well !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further on in the article you posted it says this,

 

 

In our view, death from direct cannabis toxicity is unlikely, as this event is generally viewed to be medically impossible. The incidence of a heart attack as a contributing factor in the case of death that is not otherwise fully explainable is certainly a possibility, but the notion that smoking half a joint would trigger a fatal heart attack in a person who did not exhibit any existing cardiovascular disease strains credulity. Accordingly, we rank this claim as unproven.
Link to post
Share on other sites

No you dont, that's the point.

You choose to live in a democracy and that gives you the right to live in another country if you dont like the laws.

 

Yes to research. THC has many benefits but I don't think that I should be allowing druggies n potheads to be inventing illnesses so they can have a medical card like in the USA.

 

Ps I dont care if your offended with the terms druggies and potheads.

Until its made legal ( never happen in the form you want) then that's what they are.

After that ill refer to them as addicts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cannabis will be legalised for recreational use in the very near future the dam has been busted.

 

 

The UK is the largest supplier of medicinal cannabis in the world most MPs support the legalisation for recreational use and like all good hypocrites MPs are jumping on the populist bandwagon now the genie is out the bottle.

 

 

The police chief of Durham has said he is not interested people smoking cannabis or growing in own home for personal use.

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jun/24/durham-police-chief-mike-barton-for-legalisation-cannabis-uk

 

 

So like it or not it is coming now real education is getting out.

 

 

The intellectual argument for legalising cannabis was won years ago, and now political argument is won. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

You fail to see I'm in agreement that THC has many medical benefits

 

 

So if you agree it has medicinal benefits then you should agree I have the right to take it as a preventative medicine rather than waiting for a specific health issue to arise that would not ordinarily arise if I had been taking my medicine.

 

 

Now that does not make sense to me ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...