Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had to call an ambulance for my wife, but one of the paramedics was not happy, about the condition of our house, as it's cluttered. And he  would only see to my wife, on the ambulance itself. After diagnosis they took my wife to hospital. My wife was ill for a few months, and received help from the district nurses. We then got a call from a social worker, who wanted to visit us, and discuss ways to make my wife more comfortable. When I asked for more details, she became vague, but could give us a phone number, if she visited. I politely declined her offer, as I was coping, along with my daughter in caring for my wife. Then a letter arrived from another social worker, saying similar things, to the first. I didn't bother to reply. Another letter has just turned up, from the social services legal department, which doesn't say anything specific, but refers to the other social workers trying to visit us. Coming from a legal department, has badly upset my wife, who's recovery was on going, and she now fears that someone will be coming to the house, to do whatever. Do we have to respond, or take notice of these people. Also we recently had a fire prevention officer come and fit, smoke and heat detectors. He didn't voice any concerns with the conditions at the property. Worried, Paul.
    • By not sticking to the deadline which you set you have lost credibility. Your letter of claim becomes one of hundreds of others which they receive and which they put in the bin because they think that you are just bluffing.  
    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Primark sending RLP CCTV


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My friend was caught stealing at primark, we were with two others, these two left the shop 10 minutes before we did, because I had to pay so my friend that stole come with me.

She stole goods worth £10 in the changing rooms at primark, they got given back with no damage. I wasn't in the changing room with her so had nothing to do with it.

We were then detained as we left the shop, they told her she would get a RLP fine without contacting police. They phoned both our parents so they could "release" us. They only told her she would get the fine. We're also banned for 6 months and will get arrested if we go back in during this time.

 

A month later we both got a letter demanding £174 in seven days, from RLP, were only 16 years old so can't pay that amount in so little time. My mum rung primark and they are sending CCTV to RLP who will decide if I was involved.

They said if they can't find anything showing I'm involved they will say sorry for sending it.

 

Will RLP look at the CCTV? It happened in a changing room, will they have CCTV in there? Will they assume I helped her if there's no CCTV in there? How long do they keep CCTV for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG. I have moved your thread to our dedicated RLP forum.

 

I have to nip out soon but in the meantime, read around the RLP forum to get some ideas. Do nothing as yet.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore the letters. Completely. Rlp cannot do anything except send you silly letters. Primark will also not send rlp any CCTV evidence as that would breach the data protection act.

 

Do NOT PAY a penny, make sure you ignore all letters, learn from your mistake and get on with your life.

 

If your parents are worried, tell them.not to be and to come and read the RLP forum on this site.

 

Rlp is nothing more than a shady company ran by a very silly woman who preys on the uninformed and vulnerable.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell your mum to forget it, IGNORE them.

 

RLP are chancing their arm and they know it.

If they (Primark) didn't call the Police, and there was no Police involvement, then the matter has been dealt with.

 

There has been NO LOSS to the store, the items were returned.

 

There silly letters will tell you that the cost of the security being taken away from their job blah blah blah cost this blah blah blah, forget it, the job of the security is to do exactly that, security. They will get paid no matter what.

 

This is an elaborate con by RLP to threaten and intimidate uneducated shoplifters, there is no fine, no court, no jail, and now no police.

 

Be aware, that RLP will send you ever increasing threat letters, you CAN ignore them, and you SHOULD ignore them, once their computer has spat out the last of their threatogrammes, they will pass it onto their powerless debt collection agency (DCA) who again can be ignored!

 

If you're easily intimidated by words in a letter, then don't read the letters, the woman who owns this business is very very well known on here, and the advice has always been to ignore their puerile missives.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will primark send the CCTV, my mum rang primark to try and clear my name, this is why they said they will send the CCTV to RLP and let them decide within a week.. My mum threatened that if they don't clear my name and don't have proof I helped her she would take it to the papers..

 

however would they take us to court? If so what would come out of it being taken to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like your mum is firmly on your side. It is extremely unlikely that this would go to court - RLP got severely castigated last time they tried (look at the Oxford case).

 

One more thing: If Primark have CCTV coverage of the changing rooms, it would only be of the general area and not inside the cubicles. IF it came out that CCTV was inside the cubicles, the press, ICO, and countless other bodies would come down on them like a ton of bricks.

 

Without proof of your involvement in any wrongdoing, RLP are on a hiding to nothing.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I'm just so worried that they could turn around and say I was involved because we went into the changing rooms together although in seperate cubicles. Do you think they will clear my name? Some said that they won't even bother sending CCTV?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't do anything but they will say everything. Stop worrying and start ignoring them. Also, never phone them. Ever. No matter how tempting it might be

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I heartily agree with every comment above.

 

What I would do is get your friend to register so that we can tell her(?) the same as you.

 

As for your involvement, I would get your mum to write a strong complaint to Primark Head Office.

 

You were not involved with the theft therefore there should be no comeback on you and certainly no ban.

 

This is them saying guilt by association and trying it on in the hope that one of you will pay.

 

When they try it on a bit more come back for more reassurance. In the meantime, have a read of this.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?448994-RLP-FAQ-s.-What-do-they-mean&p=4762870&viewfull=1#post4762870

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can be very tempting to try and fight it, but the best thing is to do what everyone is saying here and ignore them. They have no legal powers what so ever. They can't affect your life anymore than send letters to scare you. Don't let them scare you and ignore them. They will go away eventually.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They said I have to be involved as I was detained with her, we walked out the shop together. Before and after we were in the changing rooms we were with two others so they should technically be as guilty as I would have been but because they left earlier they got nothing. But thank you everyone! It's made me feel more settled knowing :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't pay them anything

Primark nor rlp have any legal powers to decide anything

They are no thepolce nor a judge

 

Totally ignore them

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Clear your name"

 

You have not been arrested

Charges have not been pressed

No judge or Magistrate have convicted you.

 

Therefore

 

You have not been found guilty of anything

 

Your name is clear.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was having a think about this. If the CCTV shows your friend stealing but you were not with her at the time, they should not have detained you at all. I would be thinking unlawful detention.

 

Just a thought

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCTV won't show her doing it as she doing in the changing room cubicle, I went in a different one. So won't show it all..

 

The only reason they called us back in was because they thought we were walking around "suspiciously" because we went to different floors and I put something back quickly because the shop was closing and the lights went off so had no time to pay.

 

They then called us back in, found nothing on me

but a stolen handbag on her

then detained both of us,

 

he said I was just as guilty because I was "with her"

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're wrong. They can't touch either of you anyway. Ignore their prattle and move on with your life

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back a letter saying "we write to advise that we have completed our internal investigation and can confirm that our client has withdrawn it's claim in it's entirety" does this mean my friend still has to pay the fine? I only got sent this letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There never was a fine. Of any kind. It was a con by rlp. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

There has NEVER been anything for you to pay throughout this entire ordeal.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have obviously looked at the CCTV and saw that you had nothing to do with this.

 

Personally, I would be making a formal written complaint to Primark for unlawful detention on your part. They had no evidence therefore no right to hold you.

 

It is quite important that you direct your so called friend here so that appropriate advice be given as I suspect RLP will go after her for the amount in full.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to them,

 

Primark Stores Limited

Primark House

41, West Street

Reading

Berkshire

RG1 1TZ

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...