Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I haven’t reply, so the hearing hasn’t been decided 
    • whitelist - the same with mine....the battery had a mind of its own. i bought it for my Son...he'd shut it down and it would be completely off but the power light would either stay on or flash...also it wouldnt start properly, had cmos errors on boot and other stuff.   i bought it through HP store on ebay ..brand new. after 6 days of receipt i recieced an email from HP asking if i was happy...i returned an email saying no and that i want to send it back as it was faulty (basically the email served as a reminder for me to leave them good feedback lol...not as a geniune enquiry to actually make sure i was happy with as they didnt reolve the issue when i was not) after trying to sort it for a couple of months with HP not replying, not offering a solution etc i finally got passed tech support who confirmed it was faulty. i then had to return it to their factory. this is where its gets beyond worse...waited 3 times for parcelforce to collect - they didnt. in the end HP sent me a label which i had to take to the post office - not good as im disabled with a mobility disability. then they asked for my bank account number to issue the refund. they hardly ever replied to my emails and it took over a month and a half to refund me once they had received the laptop back. no explanation, no progress emails, no updates. i kept emailing them on a daily basis as no one would reply to my emails through the website, forum, internal email addresses and even phoned 3 different departments who basically had no idea what to do or what was going on and did not help...they couldnt even tell me when the refund would be issued, let alone why it hadnt been done already. on the forums theres other customers who've had to wait 6 weeks , 2 months , over 2 months etc...it seems as though HP like to with hold peoples money to earn interest on the money in their account. i spents days phoning and emailing them - even sent a recorded letter. at the begining i phoned citizens advice and they said i am entitled to put back into the same financial position as before i lost the out of pocket expenses ie: compensation for my time and recorded letter sent etc. ive started a martin lewis 'resolver' case with them and basically in a snotty reply they told me im not entitled to compensation which is contradictory to what citizens advice told me. i was just wondering if theres any .gov website or law/legislation that i could reply with and say "no your wrong - please compensate me"
    • LBC is here. Complete with a note showing a phantom payment. What to do next?
    • I suppose it doesn't make a massive amount of difference as Kev has never had the guts to do court - well at least not yet - but to me the number of cards played still needs to be reduced.  Given the OP has already referred to the "very busy and overflowing car park" in the appeal I'd refer to that and tell Kev to go and look up case no.3JD08399.
    • thanks ftmdave again for the help with letter. thanks lookinforinfo for the info, im glad i found this forum as its a great comfort and relief to know ive dont the right thing as i wasnt too sure at first. and good to know what excel are really like.   thanks guys.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

capquest/Drysdens claimform - old 'cat' debt


tizzywigs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

proves CQ own them

 

it good in a way as the OC would not have sold the debts

if there was not something WRONG with them.

 

so good news there.

 

what are the defaulted dates plase from the summary?

 

as for the CCA etc.

 

online accounts esp catalogues, their T&C's [as do the adverts] state that your first order acts as your acceptance you are entering into a CCA.

 

if they were opened way before apr 2007 then typically the OC would have sent CCA's out for you to sign and return.

 

if/if not you did/didn't get/do this, sadly with your current orders I don't think will get you anywhere.

 

however, the sar DATA in terms of the statements will prob open a whole can of worms for them

and you'll be able to discover why they've sold the debts.

 

odds on, it'll be PENALTY charges/PPI/something else wrong as to why they

don't want to risk could so have written the debts off against tax

and sold them on a phishing list.

 

lets see what develops

 

opening dates

and defaulted dates

for the accounts from the cra file please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so Isme - opening date of the account was 22/05/08 and default date was 28/08/12 and

 

Littlewoods the opening date was 22/05/08 and default date was 27/11/12.

 

I honestly don't think the accounts were both opened on the same day but can't remember sadly.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you wont have much joy on cca wriggling wit those two

 

time to await the sar return then.

 

but whichever way you go

those two will be trashing your cra file till 2018 [+6yrs from default date]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear - not good then.

 

What confuses me is that with the Littlewoods account whereby I received the copy of the CCA,

Capquest have done the usual phone calls and harassment via any which way possible

 

but with Isme and no returned CCA they have done lots of phishing letters to previous addresses but no direct contact to this address

until the letter from CallServe threatening a doorstep visit

- am confused as to why they haven't just written to this address

- any ideas on that one?

 

With the SAR - I will be sorting out the figures for the Littlewoods account as I have the statements here to go through

, is it worth sending an SAR for Isme at this stage or see what happens in the meantime

, do you have any suggestions. Sorry for all the questions

- it's so worrying with all of this.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well 1st

nothing to worry about at all

its only crapest and they are only cat debts

 

even IF IF IF they do get in dourt

it'll only be a fiver at max!!

 

you've lots to dig up yet.

 

that sar is a must.

 

having he statements alone does not answer everything.

 

the comms log will be a good read.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, will go through the statements for Littlewoods and read through everything. What do I need to log from the statement - just all the charges that have been added on over the whole period of the account? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes fixec sum PENALTY charges [late/over/letter/debt management/phonecall]

 

they sometimes hide them as admin fees.

 

you'll spot them though

they'll be a repetitive fixed sum

like £12/£20/£25 etc etc]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

I'm not expecting an immediate reply seeing as it's New Years Eve but

 

just wondering if anyone could advise how Capquest are with settlement figures and if they negotiate.

 

We have received an offer of settlement of half the owed amount on one of the account.

(still waiting to get some charges hopefully removed and this is also the account we didn't ever receive proof of signature for),

 

they want £1900 to settle (we haven't got that but may be able to borrow from a family member if lots less),

 

is it worth writing back with a counter offer do you know?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they are offering a discount

 

that means something is WRONG

 

and they'll be MOEe to reclaim

than what they are offering as a discount

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have actually had no contact over this account,

 

about a year of letters going to my Mum's looking for us but nothing to our address and

 

then letters started appearing threatening court etc

 

which they have done now saying they are preparing the paperwork for court proceedings but

 

then further down the letter they are offering the settlement.

 

Do they acutally need to have the initial proof of signature on the account to proceed do you know.

 

This is so confusing as we are also tackling a previous Littlewoods account with them too and trying to reclaim charges,

 

they sent proof of signature with that account but not this one - very odd.

 

Any idea what we should do,

 

we haven't actually tried reclaiming the charges yet although I have the statements etc to go through

(I have been ill for weeks and in and out of hospital, all better now so ready to get this sorted!)

 

Thanks for replying and sorry for yet more questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just std threats

 

the discount is the give away.

 

scan up that letter.

 

**you can post up images/letters by this method immediately..you don't need 10 posts**

.

set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300DPI [150 will do]

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

.

************************* ************************* *******

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

************************* ************************* ***********

.

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites ...

http://freejpgtopdf.com/

..

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

or http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

or

use www.pdfmerge.com

 

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

though dont use full bank names or CAG in the title

i'e Default notice DD-mm-yyyy TSB

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

...

YOU DONT have to put a link to the attachment in the msg box..just upload it ..job done

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ta

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but anyhow

 

that's def a discount letter

 

sounds a bit like a readers digest spoof prize draw win letter.

 

selected for pre litigation review ...SO!!

 

their pre school pre litigation dept is funny

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry

- am so bad at technical stuff and was rushing my husband to scan and put the letter on.

 

 

Do you think I need to action anything

 

 

- any suggestions what I need to do as would rather not go to court a

nd worries about the effect on my husbands job as per previous posts

they have tried ringing him at work in the past

 

 

. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you send the harassment letter?

 

clearly telling them to REMOVE XXXX number from their database forthwith.

 

unless it is a joint debt

 

your debts cannot harm your husbands employment.

 

pers I would not be responding to that letter

 

i'll sort it and put it back up in a mo.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The accounts are in my husbands name hence the phone calls at work

although have no idea how they got hold of his number but that's another story!

 

Yes, sent the letter (thank goodness for the help from here)

and finally received a letter advising of no further phone calls

but I just don't trust them to not try again at some point if no response to letters,

 

my husband works for a registered charity and it would be awful if they found out about any of this.

 

Thanks with regard to sorting the letter so can be posted, much appreciated.

 

Will not respond and see what happens next

.Just one more questions,

 

I am going to be sorted the charges for the other Littlewoods account which is also with Capquest,

 

total owing is approx £750 and think approx £300 are charges,

 

have all the paperwork to go through still.

 

nyway, once I have listed down all the charges what do I do next, do I ask for them back via Littlewoods as Capquest now own the debt?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CISheet v101.xls

 

fill this out

 

put their interest rate in cell d 15

 

one sheet for each.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

 

 

Wondering if anyone could help with this.

 

 

Capquest purchased a shop direct account with a debt of around £2,500.

 

 

We did the official request for proof of the agreement and charges etc but never got a copy of this back

 

 

did get lots of info regarding orders that had been made at the time of having the catalogue so can't really deny ownership of the account!

 

 

Drysden now have the account,

balance is now over £4,000 and

 

 

just received a letter today from the County Court Business Centre stating I have 14 days to reply

including wanting income and expenditure etc etc.

 

 

Having been on the phone to family in a panic they have asked if the company may take a lower payment in full and final settlement

but not sure how much to offer or how much they are likely to accept,

 

 

not sure if by offering something they will assume I have more to offer (which I don't).

 

 

Can anyone help please,

 

 

am in a total panic with the mention of court etc and a possible judgement too.

 

 

My main question is how much they would be likely to accept to get them away for good.

 

 

Many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...