Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Residents are being consulted on plans to run overhead power cables 60km across the county.View the full article
    • The number of people out of work compared to jobs on offer mean more are competing for the same roles.View the full article
    • Small boat crossing numbers in last 7 days much more than the planned number to be sent to Rwanda. Small boat arrivals – last 7 days - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK These migrants obviously believe that being sent to Rwanda is not a consideration when they are aware of other migrants having died making the English channel crossing. If Rwanda was going to receive thousands of migrants, then it probably would be a deterrent to some. But the threat of sending 300 migrants to Rwanda is just not going to make any difference.
    • Last June, 3.4m members received a £100 payment from the building society. Now they will be wondering whether the offer will be replicated this year.View the full article
    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Work focused interview information


ukquest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3263 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All, I just have some questions in regards to my ESA work focused interview next Monday. I am in the work related activity group. I have searched on Google but it kind of hard finding the answers.

 

Questions:

1. How frequent are these interviews? Does it depend from person to person or not?

2. If they offer you a work placement or some training scheme do you have to go or is it optional?

3. It says on the letter what have you done to prepare for work since your last work focused interview..I have got a certificate in retail and I have started taking driving lessons for work purposes. Is that good enough?

 

If you know the answers I appreciate it you could reply.

 

Thanks Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Honeybee. I searched CAG. There are plenty of posts to look through which helped. However, there are a lot of conflicting reports whether its mandatory to do some voluntary work or put you on a training Programme. Can someone please clarify this? Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to your questions:

 

1) It varies from claimant to claimant, and from adviser to adviser. The rule used to be "not more often than once a month", though I think that's been quietly dropped. They should take into account your personal circumstances: how your condition affects or limits your ability to work and so on. Also, WRAG claimants can, in many circumstances, be referred to the Work Programme. We've had varying reports of how that has been for ESA claimants.

 

2) As an ESA claimant you can't be mandated to apply for or accept work (paid or unpaid), go on training courses, or undergo medical treatment. So no voluntary work unless you want to.

 

3) I would say that's fine. They have limited powers to sanction ESA in any case, at least as long as you actually show up for appointments when required.

 

As a general rule while on ESA, anything you're asked to do by a JC adviser or a WP Provider must be "reasonable in your circumstances". That is, it must take into account any limitations your condition places on you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to your questions:

 

1) It varies from claimant to claimant, and from adviser to adviser. The rule used to be "not more often than once a month", though I think that's been quietly dropped. They should take into account your personal circumstances: how your condition affects or limits your ability to work and so on. Also, WRAG claimants can, in many circumstances, be referred to the Work Programme. We've had varying reports of how that has been for ESA claimants.

 

2) As an ESA claimant you can't be mandated to apply for or accept work (paid or unpaid), go on training courses, or undergo medical treatment. So no voluntary work unless you want to.

 

3) I would say that's fine. They have limited powers to sanction ESA in any case, at least as long as you actually show up for appointments when required.

 

As a general rule while on ESA, anything you're asked to do by a JC adviser or a WP Provider must be "reasonable in your circumstances". That is, it must take into account any limitations your condition places on you.

 

Thank you Antone for your answers. I really appreciate your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

:ukquest:

 

Yes, the number of work focused interviews varies from claimant to claimant at the discretion of the work coach. The purpose of work focused interviews is to create or follow up an action plan to help you prepare for work. After that, dependent on your circumstances and the recommended interval before reassessment of your claim, you may be mandated to the Work Programme or work related activity via the Jobcentre.

 

Here's the crib sheet used by the work coaches;

 

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/support_for_claimants_with_healt#incoming-593191

(You need 04 NJWFI v 15)

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to attend once a month I'm afraid. It is a strain but I'm lucky the woman who deals with me is very nice and doesn't push me to do anything but I still dread it every time I need to go,as part of my illness is that I hate going outside. It's not exactly agrophobia but it's similar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...