Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Black Sheep wants to contest will


Mr.P
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2968 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have been appointed the executor of an estate and am in the process of applying for probate. The will is fairly straight forward with just two named beneficiaries, so once all the assets have been identified, it shouldn't take too long to wrap up. However, one fly in the ointment turned up ranting and swearing to the point that the police were called.

 

The two main points of contention were:

 

  • The Black Sheep had not been notified of the funeral.
  • Nothing was bequeathed to the B.S. (the will specifically stated that he was to receive nothing).

His parting shot as he was escorted off the premises was that he would seek to contest the will. I suspect the deceased had anticipated this as a statement from her GP is included declaring that, in his opinion, there was no evidence of mental impairment. As there has been no contact between the B.S. and the deceased for over twenty-five years (not even a Christmas or birthday card), I don't see there is any grounds to contest the will. That said, I have come across a few (questionable) solicitors advertising a 'no win, no fee' service: I suspect the indemnity fee would be quite steep if they decided to take on a case.

 

Aside from having to challenge a caveat if one is lodged before probate is granted, what are the prospects of any legal proceedings holding up probate ?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

There are several grounds to contest a will, including:

 

1.lack of due execution;

2.lack of testamentary capacity;

3.lack of knowledge and approval;

4.undue influence; and

5.forgery/fraud.

 

 

Contesting a will is classed as hostile litigation and it can be very expensive. It is my understanding that the costs of litigation do not automatically come out of the estate, so your BS might find themselves with a huge bill - I don't see a NWNF company taking the case unless there is 100% certainty they would win.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The testator had made a solo trip to consult a large, local firm of solicitors who prepared and witnessed the will. They would not release the will until a death certificate was produced and they have retained a copy of the will. That would rule out points 1, 4, and 5. The GP statement (dated a few days after the event) confirming mental capacity would negate points 2 and 3.

 

As the B.S. has never done a days honest work, it is highly unlikely he would have the funds to pay for an initial consultation, let alone enough to initiate court proceedings. I'm inclined to think that the shouting and threats was an attempt to get something out of the estate even if it was only a few pounds. But there are a few solicitors and paralegal "experts" out there lacking a moral or ethical compass, so I half expect a letter or two in the post before too long.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
My OH is also dealing with an estate that has a couple of problems and these people have been very helpful.

 

I contacted the people you linked to and they offered to send someone round for a consultation. The meeting never took place and I have yet to receive a reason or a proper apology - The subsequent telephone call turned in to a sales pitch for their services, which based on form to date, I have no confidence in.

 

Looks like the B.S. is going through with his threat of contesting the will. Had a letter turn up last week from a solicitor demanding a copy of the will.

 

Question: Are we legally obliged to provide a copy, or do we instruct them contact the Leeds Probate Registry ?

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, legally you don't have to provide a copy if the will.

 

What relationship to the deceased is the BS?

 

The B.S. is a deranged/disowned son (over 40) from a previous marriage.

 

I am currently inclined to reply and tell the solicitor to go whistle, and if they are desperate to see a copy of the will before probate is granted, go get a court order. If nothing else, it will incur a considerable legal bill for the B.S. which will have to come out of his own pocket. :violin:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A court order wouldn't run veal the will. He isn't entitled to see it and the solicitor is Willy waving.

 

I am dealing with quite a large estate, only saw the solicitor on Tuesday and expected to swear oath 3 weeks from that Tuesday. Just crack non and ignore the bs for now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the ambulance chasing solicitor this:

 

In response to your letter seeking a share of the will belonging to the late xxxx xxx. I give my response as to:

 

Arkell v. Pressdram (1971)

 

It is noted that Mr Black Sheep attitude to a share of the estate will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to a share of the estate would be were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: ‘**** off’

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tempting but not a good idea. Would make the executor look extremely unprofessional and childish. All he/she needs to do is point out he's not legally entitled to a copy or ignore the sols letter completely.

 

 

 

 

Send the ambulance chasing solicitor this:

 

In response to your letter seeking a share of the will belonging to the late xxxx xxx. I give my response as to:

 

Arkell v. Pressdram (1971)

 

It is noted that Mr Black Sheep attitude to a share of the estate will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to a share of the estate would be were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: ‘**** off’

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tempting but not a good idea. Would make the executor look extremely unprofessional and childish.

 

Agreed. However, I am inclined to engage in a bit of letter tennis on the basis that each missive that the sols post will incur a sizeable fee for the B.S. Don't know how much a back water firm charges, but I suspect it isn't going to be peanuts.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do realise my last comment was tongue and cheek and not to be taken seriously??

 

It is just the whole scenario is absurd that this chap even thinks he has any sort of claim

 

If he is not mentioned in the will then the executor has no statutory duty in passing a copy of the will to him

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted the people you linked to and they offered to send someone round for a consultation. The meeting never took place and I have yet to receive a reason or a proper apology - The subsequent telephone call turned in to a sales pitch for their services, which based on form to date, I have no confidence in.

 

Looks like the B.S. is going through with his threat of contesting the will. Had a letter turn up last week from a solicitor demanding a copy of the will.

 

Question: Are we legally obliged to provide a copy, or do we instruct them contact the Leeds Probate Registry ?

 

Hello Mr P.

 

I'm disappointed to hear that because the people we've spoken to have been helpful and low key and cost us nothing. I shall bear in mind what you've said if I mention them again.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strictly speaking an executor is not legally required to show anyone the Will, even someone named in it.

 

However the son could bring a claim under The Inheritance(Provision for Family or Dependants) Act 1975. There are strict time limits to do so and it can be very costly.Personally i would write to the Sol and remind them that their client had no right to a copy and as they are aware he can obtain one from the probate registry in due course with the appropriate fee.

 

 

 

You do realise my last comment was tongue and cheek and to to be taken seriously??

 

It is just the whole scenario is absurd that this chap even thinks he has any sort of claim

 

If he is not mentioned in the will then the executor has no statutory duty in passing a copy of the will to him

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is extremely difficult to contest a will. It will be even more difficult in a situation like this where evidence was taken from a GP and where the will was executed in front of solicitors, and where the will is being contested by an estranged family member.

 

Personally I would be tempted to simply send his solicitors a copy of the documents. That may be the quickest way of putting this to bed.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, there was a ruling from the high court overturning a will where an estranged daughter had been excluded from a will: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-12919694

 

Have been confirmed by the guys at the Bereavement Advice Centre that I don't have to provide a copy, so a short note to that effect will be on its way shortly. If nothing else, it will cost the B.S. a bit more if he wishes to respond :lol: Think of it as payback for having the police attend.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are under no obligation to show the will to anyone, even the beneficiaries. Copies can be obtained from the probate registry by anyone wanting one. When the estate is finalised, you will have to provide a copy of the estates 'statement of accounts' to any beneficiary who reqeusts one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why I mentioned the Inheritance Act. I think he would have 6 months from the grant of probate to use this act.

 

 

 

Unfortunately, there was a ruling from the high court overturning a will where an estranged daughter had been excluded from a will: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-12919694

 

Have been confirmed by the guys at the Bereavement Advice Centre that I don't have to provide a copy, so a short note to that effect will be on its way shortly. If nothing else, it will cost the B.S. a bit more if he wishes to respond :lol: Think of it as payback for having the police attend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are under no obligation to show the will to anyone, even the beneficiaries. Copies can be obtained from the probate registry by anyone wanting one. When the estate is finalised, you will have to provide a copy of the estates 'statement of accounts' to any beneficiary who reqeusts one.

 

I believe only the residuary beneficiaries are entitled to a copy of the accounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter posted:

The contents of the will is a confidential matter until probate has been granted. Once the document has been registered, you can obtain a copy through the appropriate channels.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Reply received. Reading between the lines, they didn't appreciate being instructed on the process of obtaining the will via the Probate Registry :madgrin:

Still demanding a copy of the will so that they "can advise their client accordingly".

 

I'll ponder on drafting a pithy reply when I have some spare time. Suggestions for some big words would be appreciated, the more arcane and obscure, the better.:razz:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Another letter dropped through the letterbox yesterday: We note that you have not applied fro probate yet...blah,blah.... We would like a copy of the will and value of the estate in the next five days.

 

Now, is that five days from when I received the letter, when it was posted, or originally typed up (not that it really matters). I'm of the opinion to reply pointing out that if they have had any experience of probate, they would know that these things take time.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your first posted May 20th and you haven't applied for probate? What on earth have you been doing? Just completely finished probate for someone who died in May and this included a significant amount of money and property. And yes, iv had experience of dealing with other peoples probate on a professional basis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your first posted May 20th and you haven't applied for probate?

 

It has taken us a while to identify and value all the assets. There were quite a few stocks & shares scattered around, and even now, we are not sure if everything has been identified. Probate has been applied for, and the grants are expected to arrive shortly. As there is no Inheritance Tax to pay, and the beneficiaries are not in any immediate financial difficulties, there is no pressure to conclude matters quickly.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...