Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

old Vodafone debt, now SB'd? but DCA claims a DMP company paid in 2013!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3273 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received an email from Harrington Brooks,

 

To whom it may concern,

 

Please take this email as confirmation that A***** is not and never has been a client of Harrington Brooks (Accountants) Ltd, Harrington Brooks IVA Ltd or any company within One Advice Group Ltd.

 

Kind regards,

 

so I am sending that along with this letter tomorrow. Please could someone tell me if this will suffice or if I've said too much.

 

Thanks.

 

Dear sirs,

 

I have been receiving letters for this alleged debt since 2013, and each time I have requested the same evidence from you and your other companies – none has been given. You have continued to maintain that this debt is mine and that I have made a payment towards it. This is the last response from me with regard this debt. It is not mine, and furthermore it is statute barred.

 

I wrote to you back in February and again in March to inform you that an alleged debt that you were collecting on behalf of Arrow global/Vodafone, was not mine. Furthermore, any debt would clearly be statute barred. There is no mention of this on any of my credit reports. I asked that you provide evidence that the debt wasn't statute barred, but this still has not been provided within the 21 days .

 

Today 27th April 2015 I received a letter from yourselves -Rossendales informing me that the debt was not statute barred due to Arrow Global receiving a payment for £6.33 in Aug 2013, by bacs from Harrington Brooks and on my behalf.

 

I contacted Harrington Brooks immediately, who confirmed what I already knew – they did not make any such payment on my behalf, indeed they confirmed I was not and never have been a client of theirs. Please see attached email confirming this. I have also contacted Action Fraud and opened a case regarding your insistence that I have made a payment to this alleged debt. The case ref no: NFRC*****. I feel that you are not only harassing me, but you have also created a false payment to try and force me to pay the amount you claim is owed.

 

May I suggest you now contact Harrington Brooks to confirm that no payment toward this alleged debt has been made on my behalf, and that you then remove all details regarding myself from your and your sister company's accounts. The Regulatory Debt Collection Guidance states that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statue barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”, which again should you try and proceed to court I will also use this as a defence.

 

You have legally notified me that you are the legal owners of this debt, therefore, I further request that when you confirm that you are no longer pursuing this debt due to it being Statute Barred, that you further confirm that the debt will not be sold on, passed to any other collector or returned to the previous owner, which will be deemed to be an action not in accordance with the FOC Guidelines on Consumer Debt.

 

Further if at a later date another company, either as a new owner or acting on your behalf contacts me regarding this debt, then this will automatically result in an immediate complaint to the regulatory authorities, without further recourse to your complaint procedure.

 

 

Sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll respond later bit repetitive

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite honestly you are getting nowhere with this

I'd complete the following

and let lee deal with it.

 

not worth any further actions from you then.

 

the bottom line is

you keep harking on about the debt being statute barred

that's not addressing the really issue

being the debt was the result of fraud.

 

prob at your old address? by someone that moved in and got old letters with your details on.

 

how to contact Lee:

 

We here at CAGicon have a very successful vodafone Rep operating here

.

We advise you to follow this method to alert them to your thread:

.

If you'd like any help from Lee, email your details via the Contact us form here (http://www.vodafone.co.uk/contact-form/index.htm)

.

To access the form, you MUST enter the code 'WRT135'

then state CAG Forum in the question box along with your query.

Once sent, you'll receive an automated reply with a reference number.

Post back with this in your thread on CAG

.

Vodafone UK

.

CAGi

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Lee.

 

The problem now is it's a debt owned by Arrow.

 

I've pointed out that they have already admitted that the only thing stopping this being a statute barred debt

is this mystery payment which I have proven was never made.

I've asked again that they stop contacting me as it's a statute barred debt.

 

They (arrow global) now want me to sign (I don't think so) a fraud form and state that it's not my debt.

I argued that I shouldn't/wouldn't be signing anything,

that they lied about a payment being made to try and restart the clock

and that I didn't want to receive any more calls (to home and mobile phone) or letters regarding this statute barred debt.

 

They insist that they can't comply unless I fill in and sign a form that they are going to send me.

This is a new one to me, and I can't believe that I'm having to go to so much trouble to get them to acknowledge that it's SB

 

I've already provided an action fraud ref no, correspondence from Harrington Brooks which proves the payment was never made

and a letter (2 weeks ago) asking them to now stop contacting me or I will report harassment.

Even if I had a memory block and somehow forgot about this very old debt, it's still statute barred!

 

I'd really like to put a stop to this as the phone calls are still happening as of today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you keep harking on about the debt being statute barred

that's not addressing the really issue..

 

It is statute barred though, that's why I keep saying it.

Like I said, if I had had an old account that I'd forgotten about,

that's been incurring more and more charges over the last 10 years or so, it's still statute barred.

 

I didn't report fraud to Action Fraud because I suspected someone had used my details,

I reported it because Arrow Global have created a payment from me, fraudulently.

I want them to acknowledge that the payment didn't happen, that the debt is SB'd and leave me alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi AndreaMc,

 

I'm sorry to see that you're no further forward with this.

 

So I can access the account, email me via the contact details provided by dx.

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Social Media Comms

 

Vodafone UK

 

Sent as requested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent as requested.

Once sent, you'll receive an automated reply with a reference number.

Post back with this in your thread on CAGlink31.gif

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is statute barred though, that's why I keep saying it.

Like I said, if I had had an old account that I'd forgotten about,

that's been incurring more and more charges over the last 10 years or so, it's still statute barred.

 

I didn't report fraud to Action Fraud because I suspected someone had used my details,

I reported it because Arrow Global have created a payment from me, fraudulently.

I want them to acknowledge that the payment didn't happen, that the debt is SB'd and leave me alone.

 

 

then that was a bit silly. then

report it as fraud by someone using your details from your last address.

 

 

the debt being SB'd, in E&W does not stop people chasing for the money.

until you prove its not your debt

they are within rights to chase you.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, in that case I'll do that too.

 

I don't expect them to write it off,

I expect them to stop harassing me by phone, that's all.

 

 

I thought that's what they had to do with a SB'd debt.

 

 

I'm happy to put letters straight in the bin,

but I can't do that with phone calls to my home and mobile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...