Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait until you get a refund from the purchaser before accepting anything else. Please will you post up the text of the email that you received.  Make sure that you look after the text that you received from the purchaser
    • I’ve just received a letter from a debt collection agency called Intrum about an old Halifax credit card debt, they have never been in touch before and the letter says that because I have failed to contact them they are passing on to a company called Resolvecall who specialise in home visits. This debt is from about 14 years ago when I got into some financial trouble, I had a default on file but that dropped off around 4 years ago. Is there anything I can do with this as I don’t really want people coming to my house, thanks in advance? 
    • Just wanted to check if anyone knows, I'm in the process of retrieving the transcript. There was no time frame given in the appeal judges directions, does this mean none applies or is there an unwritten timeframe that applies as a default for these things? 
    • I left a trustpilot review and P2g have emailed me with the obligatory apology and have refunded the postage costs and are will to give £10 extra pre pay as a good will gesture. However,  as i wrote this the Buyer has just txt.me.to say they have received the parcel !  So obviously im now going.to suggest that she pays via Paypal ... I rang her this morning to see if it had arrived but she said she was on holiday and there was someone in her house she would have to contact to see if it had arrived which she obviously has ... So now i know its been delivered i cant go for P2g But i Can accept the exta £10 ...
    • The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go.com Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper via the Defendant's service containing which contained two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with  under  tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was The Defendant informed me that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks I was informed by the courier that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. The Claimant did not purchase the Defendant's insurance policy as requiring people to pay extra for rights already guaranteed under the consumer rights act 2015 is contrary to section 57 and 72 and therefore unenforceable. The Claimant rejected the Defendant's standard compensation offer. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   By failing to ensure the safe delivery of the Claimant's parcel the Defendant breached section 49 of the CRA 2015.   AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £370.00 being the value of the lost goods £xx.xx being the price of shipping and interest pursuant to s69 cca 1984.   See what BF thinks but I think something like this is better. Remember you are suing P2G not evri.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell claim form - old shop direct CAT debt ***Claim Dismissed***


markwales
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2719 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Exactly... it'll eat into their profit on the claim and they'll have to work harder to boot. If you do lose you'll be allowed to pay in instalments usually. Just complete their E&I form and offer £25 per month and pay it back over 5 years...just make sure you pay it on time. My wife had a default judgement on a Lowell claim with Shop Direct for a similar amount and after two missed payments the b******s applied for a warrant and sent bailiffs even though she did pay back a chunk of the arrears after receiving the court notice - she was ordered to pay £50 p/m on this one. I just wish I knew then what I know now, but hey ho. I'll try to get my own redemption by helping others to fight them though. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 222
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

lol shamrocker im already understanding how good it is to help others through the same process........... i havent lost yet.......... bring on Tuesday!!! ..... be happy to finalize it as been working on this since March

Link to post
Share on other sites

two days to go and ive have spent too much time with my head spinning over the skeleton argument. realised i have no idea of how court protocol works. does the judge lead the session or is it up to me to make my case first??? HELP!!! for a change. sorry but lost here a min.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my case it was quite low key and informal - judge gave a brief intro and then invited the claimant to state their case, for which they read through the skeleton. I just had some notes made and went through them when invited. Some discussion took place around some of the individual points and conversation just flowed. The judge more or less acted as a mediator and asked for more clarity on certain things when he felt it warranted. The judge will be aware you are a litigant in person and should be pretty patient and generally helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need to get those TV Court drama images out of your head Mark...no wigs or gowns and docks:madgrin:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes no odds if they are or not...just stand your ground and explain your dispute.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not really a matter of making a case...your input will be limited...more a point of pointing out all the claimant flaws.:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb: Then you will do okay

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so hoping i can make a donation andy.

 

 

having looked back through the whole of my own thread many times plus lots of other peoples.

 

.... didnt know where this was going to start with, now i know where it is going and can at least, hopefully, show others that they do not need to accept hostility from people who just treat people as numbers on an alleged document...........

 

Help!!! .......... again.

 

 

court day tomorrow and suddenly realised dont know what to wear. formal suit and tie or jeans and shirt or trousers and smart casual.....

 

 

random i know but just want to present the impression.

 

 

thanks again all of you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mark... smart dress is usually what's advised. I wore a formal suit with shirt & tie but couldn't help feeling that I had overdone it, simply because you'll see some people in there wearing everyday stuff...but they're in there for all manner of reasons. Wear the suit!

 

Good luck for tomorrow!

 

Sham

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sham. youve carried me along over the last bit of this legal maze..... thinking trousers, shoes, smart casual shirt, no tie and wet weather jacket as it looks like it will be a tad wet tomorrow. cant wear the full suit as dont actually own one! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

told ya

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news Mark...delighted for you.

 

Perhaps you could give us a general synopsis of how events unfolded for the benefit of of other posters.

 

Well done..thread title amended to reflect the outcome.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOO HOO!!!!!!!!!!! WE WON! WE WON! WE WON!! LOL. A massive thanks to all that helped me through this process and kept my head straight when i nearly lost it many times!! awesome!! donation time. love it

 

Excellent news!! I'm delighted for you and your wife.

 

When you have time, could you elaborate a bit on how it all went, what was said, who turned up, etc.

 

Well done again! :D

 

Sham

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi five to you all but fair play shamrocker your post 149 was the basis of what i relied on today, split all of the figures in dispute into points and every time the judge asked if there was anything else i wanted brought into consideration, i fired it at him till the list was done. andyorch it was as you said and dx im so glad you told me so! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi five to you all but fair play shamrocker your post 149 was the basis of what i relied on today, split all of the figures in dispute into points and every time the judge asked if there was anything else i wanted brought into consideration, i fired it at him till the list was done. andyorch it was as you said and dx im so glad you told me so! lol

 

I'm glad to have been of help Mark. I was merely trying to use the strength of such sketchy and seemingly erroneous evidence to wobble their case. If the judge knocked a few quid off their claim then it would have been a bonus, but ruling in your favour was a brucey bonus! Without doubt, it was a fair outcome when you see the charges and interest applied.

 

When you find time, there's a few things I'd like you to answer if you would:

 

1. What did the judge say when summing up and finding in favour of you?

 

2. Did anyone turn up to represent the other side?

 

Sham

Link to post
Share on other sites

no one turned up and judge mentioned the fact a number of times during the 30 minute audience. the hearing is still a bit of a blur for me hence me saying i will post full details as best i can soon.Insurance, charges and interest were what did it for def.

 

will help others soon and donate

 

hope this pays lowlife back some of your pain shamrocker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...