Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

threatened for wearing a t-shirt


Shaun_6873
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Renegadeimp,

 

 

Why an earth would I be doing it deliberately? I also contacted a few solicitors last week but they can't help me as they not involved with benefit things but they did state that I should be able to wear what I want at my appointments and some said it sounds like discrimination and you should go to your local papers.

 

It does sound very much like you are doing this on purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antone,

 

 

It states on the letter the following: You were told that you must dress appropriately when attending Job Centre appointments, You should tell us why you did not do this, if you don't have a good reason for doing this then your universal credit payments will be cut or sanctioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antone,

 

 

It states on the letter the following: You were told that you must dress appropriately when attending Job Centre appointments, You should tell us why you did not do this, if you don't have a good reason for doing this then your universal credit payments will be cut or sanctioned.

 

is this letter the response to your complaint? or was this the threat of the sanction?

 

it is hard to follow without knowing the full content of the complaint and response

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you asked them to provide a clear definitive list of what is considered appropriate clothing and inappropriate clothing for signing on?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparks,

 

 

Why should I wear a Jacket? everyone else can wear all sorts of t-shirts but not me, I think they picking on me because it has the word gay on my t-shirt.

 

I think you have developed a bee in the bonnet outlook! You really think they are out to just get you? They are out to get everyone they can, give them an inch and they will take a mile! Dont try to antagonise them as they will sanction you for the least little thing they can, all you have to do is play their game for 10 mins a fortnight then go on with what you want to do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antone,

 

 

It states on the letter the following: You were told that you must dress appropriately when attending Job Centre appointments, You should tell us why you did not do this, if you don't have a good reason for doing this then your universal credit payments will be cut or sanctioned.

 

OK. Well, as I see it, you have a couple of options:

 

1) Challenge any sanction that is imposed and also seek legal advice if you genuinely feel that the treatment you are receiving is discriminatory. Note that the mere fact that your tshirt mentions your sexuality is not in itself sufficient evidence to prove any kind of discrimination. For example, it may well be that the same adviser would deem a tshirt that read "I like boobies" to be equally inappropriate. If you choose to make an issue out of this you could find yourself without money for a long period of time while it all gets resolved, with no guarantee of success.

 

2) Wear a different tshirt.

 

Note this: I am not trying to justify discrimination if that is what is happening. But you need to think very carefully about what hills you choose to die on, because proving discrimination is not a trivial task.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do not really understand why such a t-shirt is inappropriate for the purposes of signing on, unless: -

  1. there is a possibility that an employer will be interviewing in the jobcentre on that day
  2. there is a possibility that you could get a job interview arranged that day

 

if either of the above apply, i can understand the issue, but then the same issue would therefore apply to people arriving in scruffy unwashed clothes, etc

 

i would be really tempted to ask for list of appropriate and inappropriate clothing

 

one other thought, was there any mention of appropriate clothing in your Jobseeker Ageement or whatever the equivalent is under UC (claimant conditionality?)

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id6052,

 

I 100% agree with you on your post, if an interview is taking place that day when some claimants are signing on and he/she is wearing dirty clothes, trackies, trainers, t-shirts with cartoons on, football, Batmat etc then them are not suitable for a Job Interview so why just me getting picked on with my t-shirt while anyone else can wear all sorts of different t-shirts.

 

This is the bit I am confused!

Link to post
Share on other sites

my only other thought is that, if you have been wearing what is substantively the same t-shirt (all be it in a rainbow of colours) for 3 years, maybe the adviser has concerns that your limited sartorial elegance may in some way be creating a barrier to you finding sustainable employment?

  • Haha 1

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

was there any mention of appropriate clothing in your Jobseeker Ageement or whatever the equivalent is under UC (claimant conditionality?)

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done on getting a job with Boohoo (not quite sure what that is) - pity it did not last longer, so you would not be dealing with JC+ again

 

out of interest, did you wear your t-shirt(s) to work each day at Boohoo?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not wanting to be too nosey, if i am just say so, but can i ask why you wear the same sloganned t-shirt so often?

is it a gay pride thing?

is it a way to pick up men?

 

maybe, you should try others like

i'm not gay but my boyfriend is

does this t-shirt make me look gay

i'm so gay i can't even think straight

a good man is hard to find, a hard man is good to find

 

http://rlv.zcache.co.uk/rainbow_flag_and_keep_calm_and_carry_on_tshirt-r9dfaf61e5e034702a6a934cad33dbac3_va6lr_324.jpg

 

i think last one would do well for signing on

  • Confused 1

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not try to dress smart in the hope of finding a job and not just to "sign on".

 

That's ridiculous. Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work.

 

If it sounds like I'm being sarcastic here, I assure you I am not.

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

id6052,

 

Nah, it's fine, I wear the same slogan because if I don't wear it then no one will know, you can't tell if I am gay because I am 100% straight acting (sorry, if that's saying annoys you) but it's true.

 

I also wear it because I am proud of my sexuality, I got nothing to be ashamed about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...