Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax code error


Global_Ent
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been working for the same company for over 5 years now, but have always thought that i was being underpaid.

I assumed that this was an oversight by my company & that they would make amends at some stage, but didn't instigate anything as i did not want to jeopardise my employment status.

 

Anyway, after years of waiting, i finally got the nerve to enquire as to how to obtain a definitive answer.

I was told that i should contact the tax office, as they would be the authority on this matter.

To cut a longer story short, after i contacted the tax office, i was informed that not only have i been on the wrong tax code with my current employer for the last 5 years, but they actually knew about this & they were supposed to contact me a year (or so) ago, but somehow this matter was forgotten about.

 

It turns out that i had a sizeable amount owed to me, but i wouldn't have found this out if i wouldn't have made contact.

I recently received my cheque from HMRC, but my thoughts are, shouldn't i be further compensated for their errors over such a long period of time (5 years)?

 

I'm aware that if for any reason that i ever owed money to HMRC, i would be pretty much hounded & that there would be serious ramifications if that money i owed to them was delayed for such a period of time.

 

I have been trying to start a venture for years, but it has taken me a while to save funds.

 

I even had to lend money (at exorbitant interest rates) from the payday lenders just to get by for long periods of time, which has cost me literally thousands of pounds in charges.

I feel that there should be some accountability somewhere.

Can anyone offer some advice?

 

Thanks!

Edited by citizenB
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, that you should receive something for them having messed you around. But whether you will or not is a different matter. I will ask for you :)

 

 

 

I even had to lend money (at exorbitant interest rates) from the payday lenders

 

 

 

BTW, I am sure you mean "Borrow" from the PDLs ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think you can if i am right. I believe its your responsibility to ensure your tax code is correct and to question it if you feel its not. I have had the same problem and had £2k returned to me but would never have known if I hadn't of contacted them. I complained and was told that they send out a letter explaining the tax code and if you don't understand it, or disagree, you should contact them or a suitably qualified person. My accountant and my employer said the same thing.

I could be wrong and I'm sure someone else will confirm shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you waited 5 years before challenging it.

 

that could be said to be your issue not theirs

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, that you should receive something for them having messed you around. But whether you will or not is a different matter. I will ask for you :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

BTW, I am sure you mean "Borrow" from the PDLs ?

 

Thanks.

& apologies for the incorrect term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you waited 5 years before challenging it.

 

that could be said to be your issue not theirs

 

I only waited so long as (firstly) i did not know who would be the correct body to contact), & (secondly) i didn't wish to come across as a trouble maker with my employers.

This is the first experience that i've had with anything remotely like this, so i was unaware of the correct way to handle it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If HMRC make a mistake it is your responsibility to understand the complexities of Taxation and ask for HMRC to amend their mistake,if you don't, nothing will happen.If you owe the tax man money he will be down on you like a ton of bricks so fast it is unbelievable.This has got to be the only organisation who are not responsible for their mistakes,it is their customer's you and me

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only waited so long as (firstly) i did not know who would be the correct body to contact), & (secondly) i didn't wish to come across as a trouble maker with my employers.

This is the first experience that i've had with anything remotely like this, so i was unaware of the correct way to handle it.

 

I understand that and I agree wits frustraighting

 

BUT

 

The facts as it stands is that it took you 5 years to say anything. As the previous poster and others have said, It is Your responceability to make sure YOUR tax code is correct.

 

Sadly with the way the law is (and it sucks) HMRC cannot be liable in any way for the fact it took you 5 years to notice.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with other posters.

Unfortunately HMRC are not accountable for their mistakes.

Just take the refund as an unexpected bonus.

Sometimes it's worth to just accept that the system is imperfect and carry on living peacefully rather than start a war lost from the start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that and I agree wits frustraighting

 

BUT

 

The facts as it stands is that it took you 5 years to say anything. As the previous poster and others have said, It is Your responceability to make sure YOUR tax code is correct.

 

Sadly with the way the law is (and it sucks) HMRC cannot be liable in any way for the fact it took you 5 years to notice.

 

I assumed that there wouldn't be much that i could do under regular circumstances, but it was just the fact that they (themselves) admitted that they were supposed to send me a cheque last year, but somehow someone neglected to do that.

This is a fact that is on their computer & has been there for at least a year.

If i wouldn't have made contact regarding this, they probably would never have informed me.

It just seems shambolic to me, as they are quick to punish those who hold funds from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assumed that there wouldn't be much that i could do under regular circumstances, but it was just the fact that they (themselves) admitted that they were supposed to send me a cheque last year, but somehow someone neglected to do that.

This is a fact that is on their computer & has been there for at least a year.

If i wouldn't have made contact regarding this, they probably would never have informed me.

It just seems shambolic to me, as they are quick to punish those who hold funds from them.

 

I quite agree, it is unfair

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Global and welcome to CAG

 

If HMRC makes a tax refund later than 31st Jan following the end of the tax year in which you overpaid the tax, they should pay you interest.

 

Eg, if you overpaid tax for the tax year ended 5th April 2013 and the Revenue refunded later than 31st Jan 2014, they should pay interest.

 

The bad news is - the rate of interest applicable is just 0.5%. :!:

 

Regarding any consequential additional costs you incurred when borrowing from higher-rate lenders, you will not be able to get anything in compensation.

 

You should have received PAYE Coding Notices which would have showed you were NOT getting the Personal Allowances. You should have queried the Coding Notices back when they received.

 

Alternatively, if you did not get such Coding Notices, you should have queried THIS with your employer's PAYE Tax Office.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Global and welcome to CAG

 

If HMRC makes a tax refund later than 31st Jan following the end of the tax year in which you overpaid the tax, they should pay you interest.

 

Eg, if you overpaid tax for the tax year ended 5th April 2013 and the Revenue refunded later than 31st Jan 2014, they should pay interest.

 

The bad news is - the rate of interest applicable is just 0.5%. :!:

 

Regarding any consequential additional costs you incurred when borrowing from higher-rate lenders, you will not be able to get anything in compensation.

 

You should have received PAYE Coding Notices which would have showed you were NOT getting the Personal Allowances. You should have queried the Coding Notices back when they received.

 

Alternatively, if you did not get such Coding Notices, you should have queried THIS with your employer's PAYE Tax Office.

 

:-)

 

Can you provide any links to guidance that confirms interest should be paid to the taxpayer?

 

HMRC use a rate of 3% if the employer underpays so why only 0.5% for an overpayment?

 

There is also not an employers own PAYE office, it's a national system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An employer should always give an employee contact details and the employers PAYE reference number so they can contact HMRC and ask if the right PAYE tax code is operating.

 

There has always been a difference between the rate of interest the Revenue charges a taxpayer on unpaid or late-paid tax, and what they pay as compo when they refund to the taxpayer.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

An employer should always give an employee contact details and the employers PAYE reference number so they can contact HMRC and ask if the right PAYE tax code is operating.

 

There has always been a difference between the rate of interest the Revenue charges a taxpayer on unpaid or late-paid tax, and what they pay as compo when they refund to the taxpayer.

 

:-)

 

The PAYE Reference number will be on any P60 and may also be on the payslip. The employer doesn't give contact details for HMRC, there is one taxes helpline for all taxpayers.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-revenue-customs/contact/income-tax-enquiries-for-individuals-pensioners-and-employees

 

Employers have their own taxes helpline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My point is that Global should have spoken to the employer if they thought they were being underpaid.

 

And the employer should have told Global they were simply operating the tax code supplied by HMRC and that Global could contact HMRC to check this further.

 

Link to the HMRC tables for interest on tax payable; and on tax refunds - http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/interest-late-pay.htm

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...