Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3388 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If it were me I would write & send it now so it is there for first thing Monday. I would also be contacting my local Councillor(s) this weekend so they can also "interfere" on Monday, my view is that Councillors are available 7 days per week up until approx 9pm and best initial contact is by phone - find yours from https://www.writetothem.com/

 

I'll have a go at getting the email written up this weekend, I work weekend nights for 12.5 hours, travel an hour each way so I quite literally work and sleep! What can the councillor do? And shall I basically copy from the reply above for the email? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What can the councillor do?

 

 

Sorry my mistake as had not realised you now live in a different Council area - teach me to read first without jumping in. Hope I didn't build your hopes too much. Go ahead with the complaint to the CEO though.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry my mistake as had not realised you now live in a different Council area - teach me to read first without jumping in. Hope I didn't build your hopes too much. Go ahead with the complaint to the CEO though.

 

Haha, no that's fine, I had wondered what they would do as I'm not there any more. The email to the CEO will go ahead tho. 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I've sent the email the early hours of this morning, in the hope it was top of his inbox this morning. I have a response, basically just telling me an officer would investigate, and I should have a response by Feb 9th. Below is the email I sent

 

Dear Mr Partington,

 

This email is a stage one complaint, with regards to an outstanding council tax debt being dealt with by rossendales on the behalf of telford and wrekin council.

 

The complaint refers to the way rossendales have dealt with this debt on your behalf, and the apparent lack of following guidelines and laws while representing your constitution.

 

I knew nothing about these bailiffs until I received a phone call from my brother in law, informing me that they were demanding full payment at the door. They may have written to me at a previous address, but I have never received any correspondence from them personally, So for them to demand immediate payment is in breach of my statutory rights under The Control of Goods Regulations 2013 Part 2 section 6

 

Minimum period of notice

6.—(1) Subject to paragraph (3), notice of enforcement must be given to the debtor not less than 7 clear days before the enforcement agent takes control of the debtor’s goods. (2) Where the period referred to in paragraph (1) includes a Sunday, bank holiday, Good Friday or Christmas Day that day does not count in calculating the period.

 

As i have never received their Notice of Enforcement the bailiff company was wrong to demand payment from me and as such I understand

that the proper procedure is to cancel all the fees and issue a Notice of Enforcement giving me 7 clear days notice.

 

Next, i move on to the Data Protection Act and complain that the Enforcement Agent divulged my debts to my brother in Law. In addition this is also in breach of The Taking Control of Goods National Standards.

 

Professionalism and conduct of the enforcement agent

19. Enforcement agents must act within the law at all times, including all legislation and observe all health and safety requirements in carrying out enforcement. They must maintain strict client confidentiality and comply with Data Protection legislation and, where appropriate, the Freedom of Information Act.

 

I ask that a thorough investigation takes place over these matters and i would be grateful if all bailiff action is put on hold until the investigation is concluded and I am notified of the outcome.

 

I also add that while the legislation allows for the Enforcement fee of £75 to be charged for each Liability order, there can only be one charge for the

Taking Control of Goods and the bailiff has charged me twice.

 

As this botched operation is ultimately the responsibility of the Council I would appreciate an acceptable outcome especially as i have already made a payment £660.10 on Friday the 16th of January. This payment was made direct to the council as the bailiff REFUSED to take the payment and set up a payment plan, and demanded more money.

 

I look forward to hearing from you at the first instance with regards to thus matter, and inform me if the next steps, or I may be forced to take thus matter further.

 

Yours sincerely

Edited by ploddertom
Removed name
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they say that they had put bailiff action on hold?

 

PS If you are still online, please edit your name off the bottom of the letter.

 

PPS it's good that you included the legal references so they can see that you know what is going on.

Taking it further could a complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman but that can only be done after

the Council has dealt with your complaint to their satisfaction, but not yours.

No harm in copying in the LGO in future correspondence [including the above letter] if you think the

Council is giving you the run around even though the Council are still in negotiation with you. And if you do let the Council know as that may help to concentrate their minds and it may give you a head start if you do have to

appeal to the LGO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they say that they had put bailiff action on hold?

 

PS If you are still online, please edit your name off the bottom of the letter.

 

PPS it's good that you included the legal references so they can see that you know what is going on.

Taking it further could a complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman but that can only be done after

the Council has dealt with your complaint to their satisfaction, but not yours.

No harm in copying in the LGO in future correspondence [including the above letter] if you think the

Council is giving you the run around even though the Council are still in negotiation with you. And if you do let the Council know as that may help to concentrate their minds and it may give you a head start if you do have to

appeal to the LGO.

 

Hi lookingforinfo, I had a reply from the council telling me that the complaint would be assigned to an investigating officer. And I should have an outcome by Feb 9th. They have put bailiff action on hold for the duration of the investigation.

 

Can you explain the LGO a bit more? I'm not following what you mean.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you reach an impasse with your local Council you can appeal to the Local Government Ombudsman for help. You cannot go to them until

their complaints system has come to an end so what I suggested was the next time you write to the Council, to include all your correspondence with the Council and their responses. Doing it this way alerts the LGO to a possible upcoming case and the Council, knowing that the LGO are being kept abreast of the current situation are more likely to act according to the Law rather than listening to their bailiffs and trying to fob off the person

complaining.

When you do it this way, the CEO will not want to run the risk of an investigation by the LGO if they have any sense and not be so protective of

their bailiffs who may well have either broken the Law or running very close to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you reach an impasse with your local Council you can appeal to the Local Government Ombudsman for help. You cannot go to them until

their complaints system has come to an end so what I suggested was the next time you write to the Council, to include all your correspondence with the Council and their responses. Doing it this way alerts the LGO to a possible upcoming case and the Council, knowing that the LGO are being kept abreast of the current situation are more likely to act according to the Law rather than listening to their bailiffs and trying to fob off the person

complaining.

When you do it this way, the CEO will not want to run the risk of an investigation by the LGO if they have any sense and not be so protective of

their bailiffs who may well have either broken the Law or running very close to it.

 

So do the LGO automatically get notified?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When a formal complaint is made to a local authority the case will be looked at and you will receive the councils reply. If you are unhappy with their response you will see in the letter that the LA will advise you that the complaint can be viewed as a Stage Two complaint. This will involve the account being reviewed a second time but by a different officer.

 

If you are then unhappy, you can refer the complaint to the LGO to consider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When a formal complaint is made to a local authority the case will be looked at and you will receive the councils reply. If you are unhappy with their response you will see in the letter that the LA will advise you that the complaint can be viewed as a Stage Two complaint. This will involve the account being reviewed a second time but by a different officer.

 

If you are then unhappy, you can refer the complaint to the LGO to consider.

 

So does that mean there's nothin for me to do at the minute with regards to the LGO?

 

Also the council rang me once the 660 payment has cleared on there side, and asked how I wanted it allocated. I cleared the bill with the brother in laws name on, then the small 169 bill, and the remainder put on the third larger one. That means that 2 of the bills where cleared of council tax, only leaving the bailiffs fees on them accounts. Does that mean my brother in laws car wouldn't be at risk now, as the fees are Wat less than the value of the car?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They shouldn't do but often it depends on who the bailiffs are. Although now that the CEO is involved one would hope that they would do nothing else silly.

In any event some of those bailiff fees should not have been included and it may depend on how serious the Council take the breach of the Data

Protection Act as to what their decision over your complaint may be. Do not let them ignore the breach as it was wrong of the EA to inform anyone

of a debt in your name.

 

As for the LGO it is probably better as you did not send them a copy when you wrote to the Council to do nothing until you at least hear what

the Council do next. The ball is in their court and you have a bit of breathing space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...