Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Phillips Cohen for DLC trying to collect santander debt of deceased husband


Anne Elizabeth
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3182 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have today opened a letter from a company called Phillps Cohen,

addressed to the personal representative of xxxxxxx deceased, my late husband.

 

 

They are trying to collect a debt they claim to be over £11k, owed to Santander.

 

 

My husband died in September, after a four year battle against leukaemia,

so you can imagine the stress I have been under and still am.

 

 

I am not well due to all the stress of the last years and am just about coping but this letter is the last straw.

 

 

They even have the nerve to express their condolences!

 

 

They write as if they are solicitors but having searched the Internet,

I find that they are a debt collection agency, who try to collect debts from the deceased.

 

 

I think that the debt is for a loan or credit card, it's certainly not my debt.

In fact, I have checked and I believe it to be statue barred, as he paid nothing on it for seven years.

 

My husband's estate has been settled, there was no need for probate or letters of administration,

as the house, monies were in joint names and have now passed to me.

 

 

He did not leave a will, his death was unexpected, as he had had a successful bone marrow transplant.

They are trying to claim against the estate.

I do not want to write or speak to them, they disgust me and I know that further contact would cause me too much distress.

 

I would be so grateful for any advice you may be able to give to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phillips and Cohen are well known here. Despite all the waffle about compassion on their website, their unsavoury activities cause significant distress to people.

 

Do you know what the debt relates to (e.g. credit card or loan)? Do you know for certain that nothing was paid for more than six years?

 

Some people will say ignore them, but my view is that it is best to deal with them at the outset, and get rid of them, than to have them pursuing you over a period of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phillips and Cohen are well known here. Despite all the waffle about compassion on their website, their unsavoury activities cause significant distress to people.

 

Do you know what the debt relates to (e.g. credit card or loan)? Do you know for certain that nothing was paid for more than six years?

 

Some people will say ignore them, but my view is that it is best to deal with them at the outset, and get rid of them, than to have them pursuing you over a period of time.

 

Thank you so much for your prompt reply!

Yes, the debt would be for an unsecured loan and/or credit card, certainly nothing secured on property, etc.

 

 

I do think that my late husband had some argument with Santander about mis-sold PPI.

I'm sure, though, that the debt was nowhere near the amount of £11k!

It is certain that he has not paid anything for seven years,

I checked with Equifax, I think they are called, they confirmed this.

 

I am just so shocked to have received this letter,

I was very upset when I read it but after an Internet search,

realised just what kind of people I am dealing with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ruddy parasites, I completely understand and wholly agree with you about this unethical outfit chasing after what they're not entitled too, really does peeve me right off!!

 

Anyhow I am sure that a more constructive letter to the one I'm going to link will be forthcoming, IMO I would send the clowns something along the lines of Arkell v Pressdram see how that floats their boat.

 

There is also a register that you can use to stop mail addressed to your late husband from being delivered, although it would of course not stop these begging letters from getting through.

http://www.deceasedpreferenceservice.co.uk/index.htm

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are acting for a debt agency called Direct Legal and Collections, saying the original creditor is Santander. I must say, they really upset me, I am thinking they could make me sell the house, as it was in joint names. (Now in my sole name.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant touch you if the debt is SB. These parasites are ****. They couldnt care less about the law, or what happened to the original debtor, or even if the debt is SB. They will say and do whatever it takes to break you and get you to pay. You NEED to get your hard head on and beat them down.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is statute-barred there's nothing they can do about it.

 

You may like to send them a letter along these lines:

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter dated xxxxx, the content of which has caused me considerable distress.

 

Whilst I do not accept any liability for my late husband's debt, I note that in any case the provisions of the Limitations Act 1980 mean that it is time-barred, the cause of action having occurred more than six years ago. For the avoidance of any doubt, even if I were liable no payment would be made. I am aware that the Financial Conduct Authority's CONC rules require you to cease all collection activities in these circumstances, and I therefore do not expect to hear from you again.

 

Yours etc.

 

Get a free proof of posting from the Post Office.

 

It goes without saying that you should never speak to these creatures on the telephone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, thank you so much. I feel better now. You have all been very helpful.

 

 

I've tried to reply to Bazooka Boo but it doesn't seem to go through?

 

 

This is my first time of using this site.

 

 

I'll do as you advise and let you know what happens.

 

 

Thank you and also to Bazooka Boo and renegadelmp.

 

 

How did they find out my husband has died though?! Will be in touch xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is statute-barred there's nothing they can do about it.

 

You may like to send them a letter along these lines:

 

 

 

Get a free proof of posting from the Post Office.

 

It goes without saying that you should never speak to these creatures on the telephone.

 

In fact, they need to be stopped from sending letters such as they send to the bereaved people. I can't get over this, I was so shocked this morning. Most people would not know about this site and so would pla into their hands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anne, please keep us posted.

Id like to see where this goes.

 

Sorry for your loss too.

 

Thank you so much for your kind wishes. I shall most certainly keep you informed of what happens when I write to them. I don't feel so alone in dealing with this now, I'm so grateful to you all xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your kind wishes. I shall most certainly keep you informed of what happens when I write to them. I don't feel so alone in dealing with this now, I'm so grateful to you all xx

 

I'm just thinking that they may ring me up, as I've read more posts on this very informative site. Maybe they will even pass this onto another company, when they realise they can't get any money! Human nature never ceases to amaze me but if this type of thing is happening, it's almost beyond belief!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking that they may ring me up, as I've read more posts on this very informative site. Maybe they will even pass this onto another company, when they realise they can't get any money! Human nature never ceases to amaze me but if this type of thing is happening, it's almost beyond belief!

 

Oh, Bazooka Boo! I've just read the link you provided, Arkell v. Pressdram. Yes, very to the point and saves a lot of printer ink! Wouldn't leave them in much doubt as to my sentiments! It may come to this, if they keep pestering! Thank you xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking that they may ring me up, as I've read more posts on this very informative site.

 

Not once you've written to them, or they'll be in breach of the CONC rules.

 

Don't worry about it, though. If they do ring - and I think it unlikely at this stage - just hang up. I think it's likely that their letter is testing the water; a speculative approach to see if you roll over and pay. Writing to them and making them aware that you aren't a pushover and know the rules puts you in control. On past experience they tend to pass the account back to the pond life who instructed them when they're challenged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not once you've written to them, or they'll be in breach of the CONC rules.

 

Don't worry about it, though. If they do ring - and I think it unlikely at this stage - just hang up. I think it's likely that their letter is testing the water; a speculative approach to see if you roll over and pay. Writing to them and making them aware that you aren't a pushover and know the rules puts you in control. On past experience they tend to pass the account back to the pond life who instructed them when they're challenged.

 

Thank you. I have caller display, so will know if they keep ringing. They're less than pond life, I've more respect for an amoeba! Will let you know wha happens with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read this this afternoon / evening.

What a disgrace !!!!

 

It's SB ... So they can go "Whistle".

 

If they continue after you send the letter then they are on "very thin ice"

Good Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cohen are extremely well know for chasing debts owed by a deceased person

 

 

99/100 the state owes nowt to them anyhow.

 

 

if a debt does exist, write to the CEO of the company concerned

in this case satans bank.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cohen are extremely well know for chasing debts owed by a deceased person

 

 

99/100 the state owes nowt to them anyhow.

 

 

if a debt does exist, write to the CEO of the company concerned

in this case satans bank.

 

 

dx

 

Thank you to you all for your advice.

 

 

The odd thing is, that I bank with Santander and they have said nothing about this when I told them my husband had died!

 

 

They even sorted our accounts into my sole name!

 

 

It's a strange world!

 

 

Will let you all know where this goes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello everyone

 

I do hope that you've all had a lovely Christmas.

 

 

I'm sorry I haven't been back to you, as I've had some sort of flu bug and have been very unwell,

so not a good Christmas for me but hoping that 2015 will be better!

 

 

As I have been ill, I haven't written to Phillips Cohen yet, as Scarlet Pimpernel advised.

 

 

However, just to update you, I haven't received any further communication from them.

 

 

No doubt, they will persist!

 

 

I am just going to wait a few days to see if they write again and will keep you informed of what happens.

 

Just a thought or two

- there is no way that my husband would have been able to have a credit limit anywhere near to the 11k they quote!

 

 

He had been ill and not working for many years and no bank would have allowed him to have that kind of debt,

so where this 11k comes from, I don't know and they haven't given me a breakdown in their letter.

 

 

In any case, I know that he wasn't making any credit card payments in the last seven years of his life.

 

I shall keep you informed of any developments and after a few days will write, as I have been advised.

 

Thank you all again.

 

P.S. My second thought - do you think that these debt agencies read these posts? I expect they do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

good I hope they do.

 

 

we are here to expose all the DCA's that try and FLEECE PEOPLE BLIND.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good I hope they do.

 

 

we are here to expose all the DCA's that try and FLEECE PEOPLE BLIND.

 

 

dx

 

 

No doubt they will be able to identify me from my posts!

 

 

I'd rather give all my money to leukaemia/cancer research than these people, even if it left me penniless!

 

 

Our society has just become so grasping and greedy.

 

 

The amount of 11k is absolutely ridiculous but I'm not going to ask them to give me a breakdown because I know it cannot be true

- I'll just send them the "go away" letter!

 

 

In any case, my poor husband had no estate left after four years of battling leukaemia,

with all the medical expenses and travel costs for eighty mile round trips to hospital,

not to mention my having to give up my work to care for him.

 

 

We got no benefits and so any savings were soon taken up!

Maybe they should find themselves in that situation!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the money isnt in the estate, and is in dispute, then the debts died with him... to put it bluntly. DCA's know this but since they are so pompous and greedy, they dont care and will STILL chase you for it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...