Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hopefully I’m able to help someone else out with a future post however this particular subject I’m completely at a loss and ever so anxious regarding! I’ll get the letter out when my police officer husband is asleep to see what the company is whom will be writing to me. I know parking companies now seek compensation so I’m expecting these too as they have advised. 
    • You're welcome. Lots of people aren't sure where to post when they arrive but you'll get used to the forum. HB
    • I’m so sorry for posting in the wrong place and I am so thankful you have replied to me thank you.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I've moved your thread to our Retail Loss Prevention subforum for further advice. It sounds as if you may get letters from people like DWF solicitors or a company called Retail Loss Prevention but we always recommend to ignore them. If the police weren't called on the day you aren't going to hear from them. Ask us any questions you want to and keep in touch but I don't think this will go anywhere. Best, HB
    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Carter/lowells claim form - o2 'debt'


bold
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3454 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,

I need some help as

 

 

I have received a claim form from Bryan carter solicitors whose acting on behalf of Lowell portfolio I ltd.

 

 

I believe its for 02 account which I didn't pay.

 

 

I had a dispute with them and terminated the contract.

 

 

I left it at that. then all of sudden iv received the claim form from county court business centre.

 

 

date issue was 17th of October.

 

any help will be appreciated many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell portfolio I ltd

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 17th October 2014

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

this claim is for 621.73.

the amount due under the agreement

between the original creditor and the defendant to provide finance and / or services and / or goods.

this dept was assigned to / purchased by Lowell portfolio I ltd. on 5/12/2013.

particulars re- 02[uk] ltd.

 

What is the value of the claim? 794.65. [including cost court fee]

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? 02 mobile account

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? after 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. dept purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? not I know of

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? cant remember

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? cant remember

Why did you cease payments:- couldn't afford at the time

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? don't know

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementlink3.gif plan? no

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't forget to ack [AOS] the claim

defend all.

 

 

you indicate in post 1 you had a dispute with o2

 

 

what was that please.

 

 

you could send a CPR 31:14 to LOWELLS

however they might blank you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply.

 

 

where can t get cpr 31;14. and to defend all do I need to do it now.

 

 

what shall I put in for defence, and

 

 

can I file in defence over the online.

 

 

also shall I send the sar to 02.

 

 

sorry for all the question

Link to post
Share on other sites

31:14 in the library tab legal section top left [sri link did post]

 

 

oN AOS simply select defend all and exit MCOL

 

 

defence- there is no rush..go read other mobile threads in this forum.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-DCA-Legal-Successes

carter is easy to frighten away

 

 

yes you can file online [same as AOS via MCOL]

 

 

you could sar but it might not return in time

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry dx100uk but iv had a look in the library section but couldn't find 31;14. I have posted cca to Lowell and bryan carter both with 1.00 cheque which I posted on Friday. I have also send the defence all through mcol today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you onty needed ONE CCA to lowells with a blank £1 PO

 

 

cheques have your sig on them....

 

 

cpr is in the legal section of the library

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

normally that would be sent to the sols

however with carter you sent it to lowells

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no that's ok

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, iv received the letter from the bryan carter solicitor stating , that cca 1974 does not apply to the account because your contract is for service, not credit. you can request a copy of your contract from where you originally obtained the service. does that mean I need to send cca to the 02 . as I have already sent cca to the Lowell portfolio. many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ops sorry I forgot it was a mobile debt

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4.00pm tues 18th is your def deadline.

 

 

not a lot of point in asking the oc for anything

they sold it on.

 

 

dx

Edited by Andyorch
Defence deadline altered

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes go read the threads mentioned earlier

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi.

 

 

received the letter bryan carter regarding the 31.14 request.

 

 

it says; we write further to your recent inquiry requesting disclosure under part 31.14 of the civil procedure rules.

 

 

 

 

we confirm the claim from was issued by the county court business centre and the courts protocol

was followed when issuing of claimant particulars of claim.

 

 

practice direction 7c point 1.4 [3a] eliminates to requirement to attaché the documents to the particulars of claim when they are issued by this court.

 

we confirm this matter will most properly be allocated to the small track as this is a simple contractual matter

and part 31 of the civil procedure rules wil therefore not apply .

 

 

it is the ariginal creditors policy to issue agreements at the start of the contract and the statements throughout

the duration of the agreement and,in the regard. we ask you to refer to your own records.

 

we confirm our client is not agreeable to an extension for you to file a defence

as you will be aware a claim was issue on this matter 0n 16 october2014

and we are in receipt of your acknowledgment of service.

 

what shall I do . worried. thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing usual rubbish cater sends

 

 

I see you've read a few carter mobile court claims

 

 

so you should have seen that numerous times already

 

 

and seen what was advised [smile]

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just keep an eye on your defence date bold.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...