Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unknowingly bought an unroadworthy car - 1 years MOT passed 1 month ago, please help!


torison
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3522 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I purchased a used Alfa GT 1.9 JTD from a private seller advertising on autotrader around 1 month ago.

 

this was the advertisement posted:

 

M-JET 16v 3 DOOR GT COUPE, WITH FULL LEATHER INTERIOR , FULL SERVICE HISTORY ALL MANUALS 2 KEYS AND PLENTY OF RECIEPTS, RECENT CLUTCH AND SERVICE,REAR SPRING AND DROP LINKS, 6 SPEED MANUAL 150 bhp POWER AND ECONOMY ALL UNDER ONE HOOD.TWIN TAIL PIPE EXHAUST,SOUGHT AFTER STYLISH ITALIAN THOROUGH-BRED COUPE ALL IN COLOUR CODED AZZURE, BLUE, Next MOT due 04/09/2015, Tax expires 31/01/2015, Full service history, Electric windows, Air conditioning, Parking aid, CD player, Leather trim, Height adjustable driver's seat, Folding rear seats, Sports seats, Metallic paint, Alloy wheels, Power steering, Cruise control, Central locking, Alarm, Immobiliser, Driver's airbags, Side airbags, Passenger airbags. 5 seats, £1,999

 

the private seller took me for a drive and I had a short test drive in it. everything seemed fine during the drive. the HPI check was clear and he showed me the totally clear MOT certificate issued the week before.

 

I bought the car and have been using it for driving to work etc. i noticed a few minor issues immediately (as you would expect from a used car) but last week the whole car began to judder. i took the car in to my local specialist garage who said that the car should not have passed its MOT test and would have failed on at least 5 separate points as well as several advisories. the MOT certificate I was provided was completely clear.

 

The certificate is legitimate (i check on the mot check website) but the results are clearly falsified.

 

I am unsure what to do.

 

I cant afford to buy another car without some kind of refund. what rights do i have and what would your advice be moving forward.

 

if i report the car to VOSA my worry is i will be left without a drivable car - they will fail the MOT and i assume will get no refund to my outlay.

 

i don't want to sell the car on as i don't want the same thing to happy to another person, and i don't want to scrap the car as i will lose most of the money i have just spent.

 

if I ring the private seller he will tell me to sling my hook "buyer beware, sold as seen" etc

 

thanks for any help and advice you can give.

 

Torison

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could ask your M.O.T man to give you a list of the definite failure points and what he considered were advisories. Although an M.O.T is only valid at the time that the vehicle was tested, these faults were probably there at the time of the test. Contact the seller with your findings and see if he's prepared to come to an arrangement that us acceptable to you. If not, toll him that you will be contacting VOSA regarding the dodgy M.O.T and asking them to investigate the test station. You could also contact the test station yourself and tell them that you're prepared to go to VOSA. This may well frighten them into buying the car off you themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

+1 to the above except that advisories don't count, they are merely someone's opinion.

 

 

against this is the fact that an MOT is regarded as a snapshot of the car's condition on the day of the test only, apart from corrosion near to a structural area where the limit is I think 3 months.

 

 

The reason for MOTs being only a snapshot 'on the day' is that who is to say you didn't drive into a huge pothole and snap a spring etc? (not saying you did btw!)

 

 

So you may struggle, but worth trying to do something.

 

 

As an aside, when I was in the trade, I had heard of a [problem] where the car was brought back to you a few days later with claims that the MOT was bent because the tyres were bald.

 

 

I asked the MOT station to make a note of the tyre brands on the cars I sold after this, and, sure enough it happened to me... whereupon I requested that they put it in writing. I was then able to show that the tyres on the car at time of MOT were 'XYX 205/55 16' and NOT the worn out racing slicks the customer had put on in order to get some money out of me! a threat to report them to the police for fraud together with their written complaint (couldn't deny it!) usually resulted in them running away as fast as they could!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, thanks for all your replies.

the alfa specialist i took the car too also carries out MOTs,

 

the failures he noted were

near side upper wishbones very very loose/worn - wheel dangerously 'floating' as he put it, moving very easily

the center exhaust bracket was broken?

the offside rear suspension spring had come of the top of the mount and was resting on the chassis, the spring itsself was the wrong type and it was badly fitted

the offside inner driveshaft boot was split

the headlight motor had failed

and the engine/gearbox mountings were very loose and poorly fitted

 

there were numerous other advisory issues.

 

bear in mind that the MOT i was provided from 1 week before purchase was totally clear, no advisories at all.

 

I think my first point of call will be to contact the seller directly. I will probably record the call if possible and keep it as calm as I can on my side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, always record, don't call him until you can.

 

 

the offside rear suspension spring had come of the top of the mount and was resting on the chassis, the spring itsself was the wrong type and it was badly fitted
I think that will be your main point of complaint. It is different to the nearside ?

If it is a different spring on each side, then that would class the car as dangerous. If the seller tells you where to go, you will need a proper written report from your garage so you can take it further.

 

 

You say you took it to a specialist, did you actually have an MoT done or just a check ?

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

just a check... i could feel something was wrong with the car so i thought i would get them to look over it and they came back with this huge list of issues. the guy at the alfa garage is happy to write a report if required, i spoke with him on the phone this afternoon.

 

so first port of call is to ring the seller and calmly explain i would like a refund?

 

then the dodgy mot garage ?

 

then calling VOSA?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

so first port of call is to ring the seller and calmly explain i would like a refund?

 

then the dodgy mot garage ?

 

then calling VOSA?

 

 

 

 

 

Speak to the DVSA (used to be VOSA) first, in case they want to investigate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

im just worried that i will end up with nothing if i contact them first Raykay. i would rather negotiate a refund or free fix without having to take it further.

if the DVSA agree the car is unroadworthy i am stuck without transport to get to work and a big loss to my bank balance that i cant afford right now (not that theres ever a good time to throwaway money).

Link to post
Share on other sites

im just worried that i will end up with nothing if i contact them first Raykay. i would rather negotiate a refund or free fix without having to take it further.

if the DVSA agree the car is unroadworthy i am stuck without transport to get to work and a big loss to my bank balance that i cant afford right now (not that theres ever a good time to throwaway money).

 

 

 

The problem with a private sale is that the seller could just say 'I knew nothing about that, as far as I knew, everything was fine', and you have no recourse, it is not like buying from the trade where you have some protection.

 

 

If things are as bad as you say, DVSA may want to investigate the MOT station that passed the car, before you alert them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

''M-JET 16v 3 DOOR GT COUPE, WITH FULL LEATHER INTERIOR , FULL SERVICE HISTORY ALL MANUALS 2 KEYS AND PLENTY OF RECIEPTS, RECENT CLUTCH AND SERVICE,REAR SPRING AND DROP LINKS, 6 SPEED MANUAL 150 bhp POWER AND ECONOMY ALL UNDER ONE HOOD.TWIN TAIL PIPE EXHAUST,SOUGHT AFTER STYLISH ITALIAN THOROUGH-BRED COUPE ALL IN COLOUR CODED AZZURE, BLUE, Next MOT due 04/09/2015, Tax expires 31/01/2015, Full service history, Electric windows, Air conditioning, Parking aid, CD player, Leather trim, Height adjustable driver's seat, Folding rear seats, Sports seats, Metallic paint, Alloy wheels, Power steering, Cruise control, Central locking, Alarm, Immobiliser, Driver's airbags, Side airbags, Passenger airbags. 5 seats, £1,999''

 

 

Can't see any outright lies in there though TBQH.

 

 

Notwithstanding that there is little doubt that the seller was aware...the problem is that a private seller is deemed to have insufficient mechanical knowledge to be able to state the mechanical condition of a car.

 

 

Your best bet is to try and force the sellers hand by doing what you can with VOSA (not VOSA now but you know what I mean) and getting the MOT station to put it largely in the condition they said it was a month ago, at the same time getting any contribution you can from the seller.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he said he was buying another car and was going to pick it up that weekend. although he already had another alfa GT in the drive way when i went to see the car. once the V5C came back the previous registered keeper IS NOT the seller. this is quite confusing, and suggests he never registered the vehicle.

 

i have tried ringing the seller but the phone is either turned off or he refuses to pick up.

 

i think he knew exactly what he was doing, but theres no way to prove it.

 

if he refuses to contact me is the next step VOSA? im just so worried that i will contact them they will agree the car is unroadworthy and i will be left with no transport. yes the MOT garage will get a fine, nothing will happen to the seller and i will be left out of pocket... can VOSA force the garage to fix the car?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...