Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

 

Our electricity was covered by Eon in a flat we rented,

 

 

the bill was coming in at £72 a month which is very low but nobody was there all day 5-6 days a week etc

 

 

it went on like this for almost 2 years,

 

 

just before we moved out earlier this year Eon are now saying that we were not paying the correct amount

 

 

and are demanding a total sum of £1,300 from her.

 

 

Do we really have to stump up this amount due to their mistake ???

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Syntha6

 

Welcome to CAG

 

Here are the Backbilling Guidelines:-

 

http://www.energy-uk.org.uk/publication/finish/43-code-of-practice-for-accurate-bills/412-the-code-of-practice-for-accurate-bills-back-billing-for-domestic-customers.html

 

We also have EON Reps (Malc & Helena) on this site who can look into the matter for you.

 

When you took over occupancy did you take a reading?

 

Have you taken a Final Reading? Is it an estimated bill or an actual reading?

 

Please let us know how this is resolved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Syntha6

 

Hope you don't mind but need to ask a few questions. As rebel asks, during your tenancy, have the bills been based on actual meter readings or estimates?

 

If mainly estimated, I suspect we've sent a catch up bill now we've received actual readings.

 

Did you give us readings when you moved in and moved out?

 

Have our meter readers attempted to read the meter?

 

 

Is the meter inside or outside?

 

Although our meter readers try to read meters a couple of times a year, it's always best to let us have readings on a more regular basis. This keeps things accurate.

 

Without meter readings, we rely on estimates based on the usage history we have for the property.

This can lead to inaccuracies particularly when circumstances change or people move in/move out.

 

There's several ways to send us readings including online via our website, through our phone app, by email or by phone.

Readings can be sent through our facebook and twitter channels too.

 

If the opening and final meter readings are accurate, it looks as though the energy has been used and we'll be looking for payment.

Talk to us if you're struggling with this. We'll be happy to look at setting up a payment arrangement to spread the balance over a more manageable period.

 

The Billing Code rebel mentions applies where we're at fault for not billing a customer.

In these cases, we won't charge for energy used more than 12 months before the billing was fixed.

 

Sorry for all the questions Syntha6. Trying to build up a picture of what might have happened.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

No no problem appreciate it, as we really would like to know what's happened ourselves as it just seems so excessive for a small flat that was only occupied in the evenings.

 

From just reading the letters it's based on actual readings and yes a reading was taken when moving in and out. The meter is inside and yes there were occasions when they attempted to read the meter some successful some not so.

 

If these are actual meter readings we just want to know why we wasn't informed that we wasn't paying enough sooner. Why was the issue not calculated after these readings were taken ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Syntha6

 

Many thanks for answering the questions I asked.

 

As the bill is based on actual meter readings at the start and end, the energy will have been used.

 

 

Also, as we've read the meter at various times, I doubt if the billing code will apply here.

 

Sorry but need to ask a few more questions.

 

You mention in your first post you were paying £72 per month. Was this part of a formal payment arrangement like a Monthly Direct Debit?

 

If there was a payment arrangement in place, was the account in debit at any time during your tenancy? Your bills will show this.

 

Also, during the 2 years or so we supplied your electricity how many bills, apart from the final bill, were estimated? Again, your bills will highlight this.

 

Was the flat all electric including both the heating and water heating?

 

What type of meter is at the flat? Is it an Economy 7 or another type of multi-rate meter?

 

Look forward to hearing from you Syntha6.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Syntha6 and thanks for replying so quickly.

 

Estimated readings are based on the usage history we hold for individual properties.

 

As all your bills were estimated, they would've been based on the information we already held rather than your specific pattern of usage. It's only by giving regular meter readings that billing can be kept accurate.

 

It looks like it was only when we received an actual reading at the end of your tenancy that the billing/usage was brought up to date.

 

Our Monthly Direct Debits are reviewed quarterly and we let customers know if we think there should be a change. I suspect the increase from £52 to £72 was down, at least in part, to a price increase.

 

All electric properties, especially those with electrical heating, can be expensive. To try and offset this a little, Economy 7 meters are designed to give 7 hours of cheaper off peak electricity at night. This is for all usage.

 

Day usage, though, is charged at a premium rate. As such, it's best to use as much as possible during the cheaper hours. If you weren't doing this, it's likely this will have added to the costs.

 

Sorry Syntha6, I know this is like shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted, but thought it might help to explain higher bills and give you a heads up should you come across Economy 7 meters again.

 

I do understand the shock suddenly receiving a large bill can cause. As I said above, talk to us if you would like to set up a payment arrangement to spread the balance over a more manageable period.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

if meter readings were sent and taken

 

 

why are ALL the bill estimates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...