Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Opus energy revenue protection services,


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3436 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Please could I get some advice regarding an issue with opus energy.

 

My father who owns a takeaway was visited by 2 British has guys on behalf of opus energy

to check the meter (something which they did on all the shops on the parade) .

 

 

After a quick check they advised my father the meter is over 20 years old so would therefore need to be replaced.

They phoned back after a few days and made an appointment to visit and exchange it.

 

 

On the day of the visit, 4 guys turned up (not sure why it required 4 of them) and went about their work

 

 

about 15 mins later they produced a seal and told my father this wasn't the correct seal.

 

 

My father simply said oh ok, as he wouldn't have a clue about it.

They then went to leave and before doing so told my father the meter reading had been written down on a piece of pAper and left by the phone.

 

 

Having only read the letter 2 days later (as my father assumed it was just a meter reading as advised)

it's from revenue protection services for opus energy stating

'we have reason to believe the gas meter may have been prevented from registering all the gas used.

We have therefore removed the meter and placed it in a sealed box which will remain sealed until the meter is removed for testing'

 

It then says to call a number if we wish to witness the test being carried out or have any queries.

 

This has come as a huge shock to my father who's not sure what to do as it appears he's being accused (pending tests) of energy theft.

The gas men seem to have taken all the above action yet not once mentioned to my father, the meter wasn't even sealed infront of him either.

 

Does anyone have any experience in dealing with such an issue and have any advise they could please share,

 

Please advise

 

Midlands bloke

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi midlands

 

How long has your father owned the business?

 

Has Opus always been the provider of gas to the business?

 

Who has the 'seal' now?

 

Opus don't seem to have covered themselves in glory with their conduct, it wouldn't take 15 minutes to check the 'seal'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rebel

 

My father has owned the business for about 7 years now apart from approx March 2012 to nov 2012, when it was sub leased.

 

 

My father was with utility warehouse prior to subletting and in feb 2013 went with opus,

as the tennant had joined with another company in his 6 months there whilst leaving unpaid bill.

 

The guys who checked the meter took the seal with them.

 

 

Sorry if I was unclear earlier, they took approx 15 minutes to swap the meter.

 

 

And at the end produced the seal which they queried with my father

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing to do is to reconcile the bill's for the last 7 years, does that show any anomalies?

 

I would also contact a solicitor before you do anything, explain what's happened.

 

You haven't received any proof that the 'seal' has been changed other then there say so.

 

It's a good idea to take their offer to witness the box being opened as they are making accusations.

 

Hi rebel

 

My father has owned the business for about 7 years now apart from approx March 2012 to nov 2012, when it was sub leased. My father was with utility warehouse prior to subletting and in feb 2013 went with opus, as the tennant had joined with another company in his 6 months there whilst leaving unpaid bill.

The guys who checked the meter took the seal with them. Sorry if I was unclear earlier, they took approx 15 minutes to swap the meter. And at the end produced the seal which they queried with my father

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rebel

 

Thanks for your reply. I'd have to speak with my father to see if he can remember the various companies he's used in the past 7 years. Now shouldn't the opus guys have made their intentions clear from the begining and also have sealed the meter infront of my father? What if the previous sub leasee had tampered with the meter how could we prove it. I'll take the initial steps and contact our solicitor first and take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All valid points, you will need to state to them that they did not seal the meter infront of you, but now they are asking you to attend when they open it, that makes no sense whatsoever, not professional and a meaningless excercise. You have proof that the business was sub-leased for a period, if they tampered with the meter, then I can't see how you can be held responsible. Get all the information together, write down in detail what has happened from the initial visit from OPUS, the two men, then work from there. They didn't even explain what the letter was, suggesting it was the meter reading. All very suspicious. Once you have all the facts, a letter from your solicitor explaing the above to OPUS.

 

Hi rebel

 

Thanks for your reply. I'd have to speak with my father to see if he can remember the various companies he's used in the past 7 years. Now shouldn't the opus guys have made their intentions clear from the begining and also have sealed the meter infront of my father? What if the previous sub leasee had tampered with the meter how could we prove it. I'll take the initial steps and contact our solicitor first and take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...