Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • jk2054
      Evri lost 2 parcels approx. £600 (part 2)

      By jk2054 · Posted

      Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • jk2054
      Santuary Housing

      By jk2054 · Posted

      Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • finaldj
      Santuary Housing

      By finaldj · Posted

      My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • jk2054
      Santuary Housing

      By jk2054 · Posted

      I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • finaldj
      Santuary Housing

      By finaldj · Posted

      JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

wrong ticket issued ?

richardjgreen
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

richardjgreen

richardjgreen

Posted
Posted

Yesterday July the 13th parked my car in a marked space and paid my £1 for one hour.

 

The maximum stay as stated on the sign is one hour,

there is nothing saying you must leave and not return in a certain time.

 

i put another £1 in for a extra hour,

the traffic warden arrives looks at my ticket and walks on

does his round of the car park and sees that someone had overstayed by 40 mins ans issues them with a ticket.

 

The bloke who got the ticket goes mental and tells the warden that I had been more than an hour

and insisted I get a ticket also.

 

Looking on my ticket it is issued for not displaying a ticket ??

 

can i appeal on a technical fault here?

Link to post
Share on other sites
i hate bailiffs

i hate bailiffs

Posted
Posted

You will need to appeal this or pay

As before you know it bailiffs will become involved and massive fees

 

If you have the pay and display ticket it will gave a time on it as will the parking fine

Should be a easy appeal

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
JoeyJoeC

JoeyJoeC

Posted
Posted

According to their website it is 1 hour limited.

 

"Notes: Ferry Way 1 hour limited waiting £1.00"

http://www.poole.gov.uk/transport-and-streets/parking/car-parking-charges/beach-car-parks/ (Right at the bottom of the page)

 

(Assuming this is all that is written on the meter) ... to me, this would mean you would have to leave the car park and come back again... but it's definitely not clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamberson

Jamberson

Posted
Posted
thank you for the reply guys, the car park is Ferry way Poole

there was only one ticket on display

 

Could you answer my questions, in post 6. It's important to know the exact contravention - what you stand accused of - and what was on display.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamberson

Jamberson

Posted
Posted

Code 06 is for on-street contraventions. You can check with the council whether that place is defined as on-street, or as a car park. If it's the latter, then the wrong contravention code has been used, but you'll have to find out to be sure.

 

And my other question? "did you have your second ticket on display in the vehicle when he started to issue it?"

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamberson

Jamberson

Posted
Posted

Look - do you want to know where you stand or not? The question is not how many tickets were on display. I am asking whether the second ticket was on display, when the CEO started issuing your PCN.

 

Just tell us. If you don't I'm giving up on the thread because you can't be helped if we don't know the facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
JoeyJoeC

JoeyJoeC

Posted
Posted
Look - do you want to know where you stand or not? The question is not how many tickets were on display. I am asking whether the second ticket was on display, when the CEO started issuing your PCN.

 

Just tell us. If you don't I'm giving up on the thread because you can't be helped if we don't know the facts.

 

He made it clear that there was only one ticket on display. I'm not sure what you're having a problem with.

Link to post
Share on other sites
JoeyJoeC

JoeyJoeC

Posted
Posted

You had paid for the all of the time you parked there. The CEO doesn't know if you were there for the previous hour, he's possibly just going on the member of the publics word.

 

He ticketed you for not displaying a ticket, but you were displaying one. Send an appeal and they should accept it. Send a copy of the ticket showing you paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamberson

Jamberson

Posted
Posted
He made it clear that there was only one ticket on display. I'm not sure what you're having a problem with.

 

Can't you read the post you yourself are quoting back at me?? I don't want to know how many were on display. It's irrelevant. Four times I've asked a different question and still nonethwiser. It's just a waste of time. You have to have a valid ticket on display when he starts issuing. Not any old ticket, as you seem to think. A valid, current one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
dx100uk

dx100uk

Posted
Posted
please dont get grumpy

the ticket on display was the valid one

 

previous one in glove box

 

^^^^^

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
letsgetitsorted

letsgetitsorted

Posted
Posted

looking at the car park and the wording on the road, where the ticket is a car park, contravention should have been 83 Parked without clearly displaying a valid pay and display ticket and not 06.

you say your ticket was clearly on display and the previous was in the glove box.

 

your appeal should be on 2 points

wrong contravention code

ticket clearly on display.

 

when you appeal send in a copy of the ticket purchased, to show a valid ticket was there when the PCN was issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites
green_and_mean

green_and_mean

Posted
Posted

your appeal should be on 2 points

wrong contravention code

ticket clearly on display.

 

 

What has the wrong code got to do with it? He is alledged to have failed to display a valid ticket that is the only contravention that needs to be addressed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
letsgetitsorted

letsgetitsorted

Posted
Posted

however the wrong code was used to issue the ticket, 06 instead of 83, so i would have thought that to points of appeal would be better than one

What has the wrong code got to do with it? He is alledged to have failed to display a valid ticket that is the only contravention that needs to be addressed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...